Paris burning again after PSG’s win — scooters torched, streets in chaos, police overwhelmed. This isn’t ‘celebration.’ It’s the predictable result of unchecked mass migration without any demand for assimilation.
Europe did this to themselves.
Decades of open borders, failed multiculturalism, and welfare incentives have imported parallel societies that reject Western norms. France’s banlieues, Sweden’s no-go zones, UK’s grooming scandals, Germany’s New Year’s attacks — the pattern is clear and repeated.
Crime stats, welfare costs, and cultural erosion aren’t ‘far-right myths’; Europe’s own governments document them.
Rampant, low-skilled migration at this scale is killing social cohesion, public safety, and the continent’s future. Europe needs to wake up: control the borders, enforce integration or repatriation, and put citizens first — or watch the decline accelerate.
Thanks for highlighting the reality, @elonmusk
Why would Islamic countries have a problem with us if it wasn't for Israel? You are peak brainwashed, I think Islam is a horrible religion just like Judaism but you have to admit its insane to support a modern nation because of an ancient text. Why was Israel entitled to that land? The Bible? The Torah? Its insane. If you believe they have a right to that land then native americans have a right to yours. Supporting israel is a huge mistake, so many major problems are a direct result of jewish behavior and you are complicit.
I've been followed by thousands of bots the last few days who have been mass-reporting every one of my posts and damaging my reach significantly.
If you can, drop a comment to help me regain my reach.
"It's the tradition of WA state that we don't have a state income tax," says @WAGOP Rep. @JimWalshLD19 .
"We rely at the state level on other taxes, like property tax, sales tax and the B and O tax. These are the three legs of the tax policy stool in WA state.
"Through our traditions in WA state, we are not an income tax state. And that's part of the reason that we attract innovative industry. That's the reason the great timber barons were here. That's the reason Boeing grew into an aerospace power when it was here. That's the reason that Microsoft was able to take off and Amazon after that and a whole bevy of high-tech companies in WA.
"By screwing up that tradition, we not only run the risk of chasing those great companies and business off, the real risk is that the next Microsoft or Amazon will set up shop and succeed in Austin, Texas, or Orlando, Florida. That's the real risk of Governor Bob Ferguson's poorly drafted state income tax scheme."
@KCGOP@WashingtonSRC@WaHouseGOP
Let's imagine something: Biden is still President, Garland is still AG, and a bunch of dudes in MAGA hats storm a Mosque, chant "Christ is King," and disrupt the call to prayer.
Obviously, they would have been in handcuffs the very next day and not a single member of the media would be defending it as a First Amendment right.
Only when Christians come under attack does the left suddenly have a healthy respect for freedom of speech.
Let's imagine something: Biden is still President, Garland is still AG, and a bunch of dudes in MAGA hats storm a Mosque, chant "Christ is King," and disrupt the call to prayer.
Obviously, they would have been in handcuffs the very next day and not a single member of the media would be defending it as a First Amendment right.
Only when Christians come under attack does the left suddenly have a healthy respect for freedom of speech.
A man said "I accept Jesus Christ" on his deathbed.
The church asked if he really meant it.
I need to ask you something.
When did we become the gatekeepers of grace?
I've watched Christians dissect Scott Adams' final words like prosecutors.
They parsed his phrases. They weighed his tone. They measured his faith against some invisible scale and found it wanting.
"That doesn't sound like surrender," they said. "That sounds like a man hedging his bets."
And I understand the instinct. I do.
But there's a verse that haunts me. Not because it's obscure—because it's too simple.
"Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved."
(Romans 10:13)
Whosoever.
Not "whosoever truly believes in their heart of hearts." Not "whosoever demonstrates sufficient sincerity." Not "whosoever calls early enough in life that we trust their
motives."
Whosoever.
The moment we add prerequisites to that promise, we've traded the Gospel for religion.
We've smuggled works back in through the side door labeled "authentic faith."
I know what some of you are thinking.
But he admitted he wasn't a believer.
He talked about "risk and reward."
He said he hoped he'd "qualify."
Yes. He did.
And those words make us uncomfortable. They don't sound like the confident declarations we want from converts. They sound uncertain. Calculating. Human.
But here's what I need you to hear:
The thief on the cross didn't have time to develop mature theology either.
He was a criminal. Hours from death. He looked at Jesus and said, "Lord, remember me when you come into your kingdom."
That's it.
No profession of belief in the resurrection. No renunciation of his former life. No evidence of transformed character.
Just a desperate man, reaching for a hand he wasn't sure would take his.
And Jesus said, "Today you will be with me in paradise."
We have a problem, and it's not Scott Adams.
It's us.
We've internalized a law that God never gave us. A natural sense of fairness that says late arrivals should get less. That deathbed conversions are suspicious. That the math
should somehow work out—more faith, more years, more sacrifice equals more standing before God.
Jesus told a parable about this.
We skip over it because it offends us.
A landowner hired workers throughout the day. Some came at dawn. Some at noon. Some showed up with one hour left.
At the end, he paid them all the same.
The early workers were furious.
"These who were hired last worked only one hour, and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the work and the heat of the day."
(Matthew 20:12)
And the landowner replied:
"I am not being unfair to you, friend. Didn't you agree to work for a denarius? Don't I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?"
There it is.
The scandal of grace is that it feels unfair.
A man who mocked God for sixty years gets the same inheritance as the saint who served since childhood. A skeptic who hedged his bets at the last breath stands in the same kingdom as the martyr who gave everything.
And something in us recoils.
That's not grace rejecting us.
That's us rejecting grace.
Let me tell you what I see when Christians interrogate a dead man's faith.
I see the older brother standing outside the party, refusing to go in.
The prodigal came home reeking of pig filth and poor decisions. The father ran to him. Threw a robe on his back. Killed the fattened calf.
And the older brother?
"Look! All these years I've been slaving for you and never disobeyed your orders. Yet you never gave me even a young goat so I could celebrate with my friends. But when this son of yours who has squandered your property with prostitutes comes home, you kill the fattened calf for him!"
(Luke 15:29-30)
He couldn't celebrate the return because he was too busy auditing the journey.
Sound familiar?
Here's the truth we don't want to face:
We can't see hearts. We can only see words.
And the words Scott Adams spoke were: "I accept Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior."
Were they perfect? No.
Were they confident? No.
Were they the words we would have scripted? No.
But they were the words.
And the God who receives those words is not checking for tone. He's not running sentiment analysis. He's not grading on a curve.
He's looking for open hands.
Paul wrote something that lands differently now:
"Who are you to judge someone else's servant? To their own master, servants stand or fall. And they will stand, for the Lord is able to make them stand."
(Romans 14:4)
Scott Adams was not our servant to judge. He answered to his own Master.
And the Lord is able—able—to make him stand.
That's not my promise. That's Scripture's promise.
The question is whether we'll submit to it.
I know why we do this.
I know why we parse and weigh and question.
Because if grace is really this free, then we didn't earn our place either.
If the deathbed convert gets in, then our decades of service weren't the price of admission. They were the privilege of knowing Him longer.
And that reframes everything.
It means the faith we've built isn't a resume. It's a relationship.
It means our years weren't buying something. They were receiving something.
It means we were never the workers earning a wage.
We were always the prodigals coming home.
So did Scott Adams get saved?
I don't know.
But I know what the Scripture says.
Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
I know what Jesus promised the thief who had nothing to offer but a desperate plea.
I know what the father did when his son came crawling home with a rehearsed speech that never even got finished.
And I know what the landowner said to the workers who were angry that grace didn't do math the way they wanted.
"Are you envious because I am generous?"
The gate is narrow, but it's not locked.
The standard is high, but it's not ours to enforce.
The Judge is holy, but He is also the one who ran to meet the prodigal while he was still a long way off.
Stop auditing the dead.
Start marveling at the grace that let you in.
"Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved."
Whosoever.
Even him.
Even you.
What saith the Scriptures?
That's the only question that matters.
Exact quote from No Kings organizers:
"Throughout history, people who have come together in protest against authoritarian regimes have utilized a color that is easy to see among a sea of thousands."
They aren't denying it. No Kings was literally an attempt at a color revolution.
@gatorgar May I suggest looking for a church that has an Awana kids program. They are probably a Bible believing church. More importantly, ask for God's guidance.
🚨 Senior Hamas official, Basem Naeem, rejects Trump's latest deal proposal: We are facing initial ideas that the American side calls a "proposal." The main goal of this matter is to lead to a situation of "rejection of the proposal" instead of reaching an agreement that will lead to the end of the war, a complete withdrawal of enemy forces, and a prisoner exchange deal. They want a "humiliating surrender" or the continuation of the war.