The 100% CI

- Always confident. Sometimes credible. @annemscheel @rubenarslan @maltoesermalte @dingding_peng (25% each)

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

https://t.co/JZDpQewF4N

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

New post: Think inside the box, part 1: The guy Euclidean distance told you not to worry about

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

Link to the post: https://t.co/5SXTDiBsD5

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

New post by Malte at The 100% CI: The Untold Mystery of the Rogue RA

[Ruben C. Arslan @rubenarslan]

New post @the100ci by me: I read two books on the alleged teen mental health crisis and social media's role in it, by @JonHaidt and by @drlucyfoulkes. Then, I tried to make up my own mind, with limited success.

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

Link: https://t.co/T7i5LvprMp

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

New post on the 100% Christmas Interval -- after almost 8 years, it's time that we finally talk about CIs.

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

Btw. Julia has moved on to a better place https://t.co/3hEXsvLcJh

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

Behind the first door of the 100% CI advent calendar is a new blog post by Julia! In which she hands out unsolicited writing advice -- with a focus on writing about technical topics in an accessible manner, but most of it is fairly general

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

https://t.co/YQlpgChnFm

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

New post! Many idiographically motivated papers in psych leave @dingding_peng unimpressed as they (1) fail to establish meaningful variation, (2) neglect unreliability at the individual level and/or (3) suffer from the usual estimand confusions
https://t.co/bZuLWKxe8q

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

New post! @dingding_peng argues that if you're a substantive researcher, you mainly do statistics to answer substantive research questions. So let's stop putting the statistical model first.
https://t.co/Eo2jaU6pSI

[Vilgot Huhn @VilgotHuhn]

Great short post on causality in psychology that should be read by every PhD student (or just anyone interested in interpreting research generally).

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

If an effect falls in a forest and no one is there to determine what's the mechanism, is it causal? New post in which @dingding_peng explains why causal effects are indifferent to mechanisms & why effect heterogeneity is the default. https://t.co/YsQ0CTVwFP

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

Should you argue about statistics? In this new blog post, @dingding_peng explains why it's futile. But you should still keep fighting! https://t.co/qbQY70uLlb

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

New post! @rubenarslan asks: Do we have a problem with construct and measure proliferation in psychology? It depends who you ask and it varies by subdiscipline. We respond to a recent piece by Iliescu et al. and try to find some common ground.
https://t.co/GyvdZoG0K1

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

New post by @rubenarslan, but not on @the100ci because he was too lazy to transfer the Latex formulas to Wordpress.

[Ruben C. Arslan @rubenarslan]

New post on estimating the reliability of parameters in multilevel models. There's an easy solution using the standard errors of your shrunk parameters. It feels kind of obvious, but maybe it isn't sufficiently obvious yet.
https://t.co/ncuF88x1jj

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

New post! Have you been indifferent to invariance? @dingding_peng argues that measurement (non-)invariance gets a lot more interesting once you think about it from a causal perspective. https://t.co/SuuFmTekJI

[The 100% CI @the100ci]

This is the kind of impact not measured by the h-index.
https://t.co/Ewr3i9xYVT

[WrestlingWorldCC @WrestlingWCC]

Nikki Cross will be pursuing her PhD while continuing her professional wrestling career 🔥