Day 1 of watching the burn & buyback mechanism do its thing. 🔥♻️
Less supply. More conviction.
$FRONG is just getting started. 🐸
#FRONG#Crypto#Uniswap
I think $FRONG could become one of the biggest memes on Robinhood Chain🐸🦄
Think about the setup:
@Uniswap launches @TradePools on a fresh chain.
$FRONG comes directly from the early testing.
Then creator fees get turned into automated buy + burns, while trading keeps building permanently locked liquidity.
So if Uniswap pushes TradePools and Robinhood Chain grows, $FRONG gets more attention → more volume → more liquidity → more burns → even more attention.
That flywheel can get crazy once volume really starts coming in.
$FRONG is still around ~$5M.
If this becomes the meme people associate with Uniswap + TradePools + Robinhood Chain, I don’t think we’re talking about $10M or $20M.
I’m looking much higher 🐸
The $frong Thesis just startet
Uniswap V4 just flipped the script:
creator fees? Not for the team.
They get turned into ETH that anyone can claim… only by burning a fixed chunk of FRONG, supply gone forever.
Scarcity up → same demand,
fewer bags → price go brrr.
Bots & searchers do the burns for you. Holders just sit. Continuous, steady supply death. No one-and-done dump.Uniswap chose $FRONG (and the early Pools test tokens) as the pilot because it was already live with real volume. They took the fee stream and turned it into pure buyback-and-burn for holders. Built-in deflation engine:
more volume → more burns → less supply → stronger bags.That’s it. More cook, less cope.
so long the frong
$FRONG is on Robinhood Chain, where Pools just launched
And I think this could be the token they push hard to showcase v4 and the new tech
This is the ca 0x6245e67affa44a23077f0ea7f981a8dc743a0c47
Nothing confirmed yet but the setup is pretty obvious
why frong:native can go much higher (very simple)
launchpads usually ''extract'' from your chart but @TradePools does the opposite:
> 0 launchpad fees
> 0.25% LP fee
> optional 0.05% creator fee
after Uniswap’s update, FRONG’s creator-fee path is being routed into buyback + burn
so every $100M volume is roughly:
> $250k making liquidity deeper
> $50k buying back / burning FRONG
i understand people's bag biases, i have my own but it's stupidly simple why this is a much more healthy way to launch tokens
love or hate @Uniswap they're actually shipping a better product for everyone