Perhaps embedded within the very matrices of our consumption—whether material or symbolic—there proliferates an insidious epidemic that legitimates a jubilant surrender to unmediated ignorance, even as it inaugurates a radical estrangement from the labor of rational consistency.
@Kianeeeee_ I've been using it since 2022.
It's actually a nice network. Many of the criticisms and stereotypes about how it's annoyingly slow are just media and memetic nonsense. It's pretty decent.
You should have said we should also start hanging them nah. Since your retarded self didn't know even the hanging that the so-called white supremacists engaged in were still condemned.
Fucking idiotic analogy.
@ChimdiIbeawuchi@JohnOche616985 Don't mind them. They'll always bring up a weird defence as to why this particular one isn't dancing when it's clear the reason is that he'll fuck anyone who gets close to him up.
I wanted to say this when I first saw the video. Almost exactly this. It was a stupidly funny sight to behold, and this is exactly what would minimise the stupid dancing thieves trend that they think they invented: when the thieves begin to defend themselves with proper weapons.
And yet the Nigerian government did not scrap out the full ((working)) frameworks built by colonialism but furthered it? That's not Eurocentric enough? How many advanced institute of learnings did we have before colonisation AS NIGERIA (not counting regions)?
@Krathor_@eldivine Calling colonialism “a necessary evil” revealed your illiteracy. Asking how many universities existed before is implicitly assuming that “university” is the only valid unit of knowledge production.
Are you this dull?
Why does everything have to be “Eurocentric” to be civilized?
Does the existence of this chair invalidate the First Law of Thermodynamics? If no, then it CAN exist out of raw materials. Can the same be said of God's creations (which came from either absolutely nothing (hence, invalidating FLT) or from God's components (Pantheism))?
clearly all the words and numbers used in this proof are already part of the training data. i went through the entire 125 pages of summarised cot, i couldn't find a single novel symbol in there.
they really think they can continue fooling everyone with this. all the elementary pieces used to prove this were already known. not one new integer was invented. not one fresh Greek letter was discovered in the wild. the model simply rearranged previously existing mathematics into an order that happened to solve the problem, which is obviously just memorisation if you ignore the rearrangement, the dependency structure, the proof search, the synthesis, and the fact that this is exactly what mathematicians... ahem ahem
anyhow, wake me up when it invents a completely new field all by itself and new greek letters and numbers with properties completely unknown. that is the true test for agi.
This question comes from the assumption that it is possible for information to not exist at all, and that's logically and realistically IMPOSSIBLE. It is impossible for nothing to exist and/or for something to come from nothing.