No title fixes that gap. Only the system does.
Creating the role suggests the problem has been identified. Whether it's the right solution depends on the context and that's hard to judge from the outside.
But the new role will defo need to have the power to change the system.
It always makes me pause when a sports organisation hires for titles like Head of Culture or a Head of Innovation.
I wonder whether you can appoint someone to produce either one.
Which brings me to the question of: what does your system reward?
A club that says it believes in youth development but plays the veteran every time the team is under pressure has a gap between the vision and the actions.
AMS providers are rushing to add AI but the actual value is capturing practitioners’ decisions, the thinking behind them and the outcomes.
We need better ways to capture context or AI is just another chatbox.