ہم کیا ہمدردی کریں گے۔۔ہم کیا محبّت کریں گے۔۔😑
محبّت اور ہمدردی کی ساری حدیں میرے اور آپ کے نبی حضرت مُحمّد ﷺ نے ہی پوری کردی۔۔😔☺️
آخری وقت بھی اللہ سے اُمّت کی بخشش کی دُعا کی۔۔۔🙏😪
یا اللہ ہمیں نبیﷺ کی سُنّت پر عمل کرنے کی توفیق دے۔۔۔😒
🚨🇮🇷🇵🇰🇮🇱 BREAKING: IRAN WINNING 'EXISTENTIAL WAR'
Today on Legitimate Targets, Jackson Hinkle speaks to Pakistani Senator Mushahid Hussain @Mushahid about how IRAN is WINNING the war of Zionist aggression and what the assassination of Ayatollah Khamenei means for Pakistanis.
Did you know that CIA funds different groups in probably Arlington, Virginia, or Langley etc to generate AI videos of the war and do propaganda against their own citizens ?
The US is forced to make this war bigger and extended. They’re arming or probably funding the Kurds in Iraq and Southern Iran. For the US, this war is going to be a total mess while its logistics are falling.
Iranian officials say the government can withstand the attacks and believe the U.S. and Israel will eventually lose their appetite for war.
Their strategy—called Operation Madman—aims to raise the costs of the conflict until Washington and Tel Aviv back down.
NYT
THE AF-PAK BETWEEN MYTH AND REALITY
When it comes to the AF-Pak region, most of the calculations and analyses are based on politically motivated myths that were invented ironically by the West to achieve certain political objectives during the Cold War and the so called War on Terror.
One of which has even found grounds in the strategic understanding of some of the Taliban leadership that they have defeated the superpowers, and a prolonged battle of attrition would lead to the disintegration or collapse of Pakistan.
This assumption overlooks several crucial realities.
1. First, unlike the Soviet Union or the United States/NATO, Pakistan is not an extra-regional power projecting force from thousands of miles away. More importantly, the Taliban are not fighting a guerrilla war on their own terrain against a foreign occupier. Instead, they are pursuing an expansionist insurgency on Pakistani territory, particularly in the tribal districts and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
This fundamentally alters the strategic environment. Logistics, manpower sustainability, intelligence penetration, and political will operate very differently when a state is defending its own territory rather than conducting an expeditionary war. This is why, historically, all armed insurgencies backed by Afghanistan or the Soviets against Pakistan have failed and collapsed over the years due to the structural advantages enjoyed by the Pakistani state within its own territory.
From Islamabad’s perspective, this is an existential security challenge tied directly to territorial integrity and internal stability. So the will and motivation for war is different from the Soviets and Americans.
2. It is also important to recognize the role Pakistan itself played during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and later during the U.S. led intervention. Afghanistan’s insurgent movements were able to sustain prolonged resistance in large part because Pakistan functioned as their strategic rear base. Cross border sanctuaries provided depth, material support, financial flows, logistics corridors, medical treatment, and training infrastructure. All the elements that are critical for sustaining a long term insurgency.
In case of full scale war with Pakistan, this won't be available.
Infact, Pakistan still hasn't gone after the logistical supply and financial chain of the Taliban regime that even now has prints in Pakistan. This restraint suggests that Islamabad’s current approach is not aimed at regime change or nation building in Afghanistan.
Pakistan is pursuing a strategy of controlled pressure, essentially imposing a low-intensity war of attrition similar to the pressure Pakistan itself has endured for years. However, if the status quo persists, this approach could gradually shift toward a strategy aimed at dismantling the regime’s operational capacity.
A few important aspects of Pakistan's ongoing campaign.
1. The destruction and dismantling of all warhouses, ammunition depots (US-NATO), to downsize the capabilities to wage a long war either independently or in coordination with other global or regional players, including India.
2. Dismantling and siezing of forward operations bases and border posts to create a very small buffer zone, to limit cross border attacks.
3. Constant overflights to undermine the legitimacy of the regime by challenging the concept of absolute victory and sovereignty.
What's in the bag?
Pakistan can up the ante by moving up the escalation ladder. Pakistan still hasn't inflicted mass casualties, hasn't targeted the long convoys moving from West to East, and hasn't targeted the critical infrastructure or logistical networks from bridges to railways.
Pakistan can continue the low or high tempo air campaign with an additional element of decapitation. The imposition of the No-Fly Zone, cutting the link with Iran and many other elements.
Pakistan could eventually move towards 'Denial of the regime', continuing the attrition war until the Taliban loses the will, legitimacy or operational capacity or all.
The trajectory of the conflict will ultimately depend on whether the Taliban leadership reassesses its strategic assumptions or continues to operate under narratives shaped more by myth than by the structural realities of the region.
Iranian President Pezeshkian rejected claims that Iran attacked Azerbaijan, calling the reports “enemy-driven rumors aimed at damaging brotherly relations between neighboring countries.”
The Gulf Arab countries let American bases onto their territory. Naively, they expected protection from them. Like hell! The US just uses them, while protecting only one country. Think long and hard about whether you really need US bases – they’re not protection, they’re a threat
Russia:
The Gulf Arab countries let American bases onto their territory. Naively, they expected protection from them.The US just uses them, while protecting only one country.
Think long and hard about whether you really need US bases – they’re not protection, they’re a threat.
As the war develops, we will see the making of paxes in international power structures: Pax Americana, Pax Judaica, Pax Sinica, Pax Europaea, and Pax Islamica. That’s how the powers will compete in WW3
BREAKING:
🇺🇸Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Qatar are discussing withdrawing from contracts with the U.S. - Financial Times
They want to cancel future investment commitments in the U.S. to alleviate some of the economic strain imposed upon them by the Iran war
Chabad-Lubavitch is a major, outreach-focused Hasidic movement within Haredi Judaism founded in 1775, known for its global network of over 3,500 institutions. Based in Brooklyn, NY, it aims to engage all Jews, regardless of affiliation, through educational and social services.
Israel’s military doctrine has evolved.
From primarily defensive wars to a doctrine of pre-emptive regional strikes designed to remove threats before they fully emerge.
Israel’s confrontation with Iran is not simply about Iran.
According to analysis by Middle East Eye, it is part of a broader strategy aimed at achieving regional supremacy across the Middle East.
History shows regime collapse does not necessarily bring democracy.
Examples often cited:
• Iraq after 2003
• Libya after 2011
Both experienced state breakdown and prolonged instability.