watching FIFA, probably late night but sometimes I think I am watching EA SPORTS FC™ 26 and have to focus really hard to understand that it's real humans playing
Took some time to figure out deployment parts as I was deploying on unfamiliar to me cloud, codex is unmatched when it comes to automating deployment and debugging production problems related to setup, very reliable
Claude still writes good code and much better at frontend, borrowed some references from existing course website and made nice redesign (see before in quoted tweet)
In just one hour with Claude Code I have progress track with ability to resume for individual lessons if user left in the middle, simple and consistent UI
Rails side of code is quite clean, so far it's the way I like it, I review code myself together with Codex, Codex would suggest me few things here and there when it comes to readability, but it leans towards more verbose, abstraction/helpers approach which I don't like, still useful to help me catch stuff I might miss
Also few but impactful tests, in no world I would be writing tests for such simple MVP myself, never bothered in the initial stages of the product, but in this case since Claude Code writes them for me I just let it do it with some constraints in my prompts, otherwise it would create a bunch of useless tests
asking codex to go through codebase and identify missing tests for behaviors we need to test for revealed more subtle bugs than directly asking codex to find bugs
Remember Winamp? I have absolutely no idea what are they doing right now, but it seems that their forums are quite active, although the topics are a bit weird
why my claude started to use perl for quick testing instead of bash (or python, or atleast ruby which this codebase is in)
I never even knew mac comes with perl installed (why?)
something that I like in rails (ruby) is how can I just do 5.seconds or similar methods on number objects
I wonder what's more accepted practice, in general it's better to have descriptive var names instead of having arbitrary numbers, but here, reading 5.seconds looks cleaner to me
@peer_rich in b2b context
if all of the customers of my competitors are complaining about x and I really see it as a pain for them, yet none of the competitors offer solution for x, wouldn't it be reasonable to assume that there might be a valid reason why they are not building it?