Laotian national Tou Lue Vang was convicted of sexually abusing a 10-year-old girl in Minnesota.
He was set to be deported until @GovTimWalz issued him a pardon.
Then, I revoked his legal status. @ICEgov has removed him from the U.S. and he will never endanger another American.
@TheRealJamieKay 45 “All these disasters will come on you, and they will be with you until you are destroyed, because you did not obey the Lord your God and keep all the laws that he gave you.
@TheRealJamieKay Deuteronomy 28:43-45
43 “Foreigners who live in your land will gain more and more power, while you gradually lose yours. 44 They will have money to lend you, but you will have none to lend them. In the end they will be your rulers.
Just to give you guys an idea of how terrible the SCOTUS decision is today, the literal framers of the 14th amendment themselves agreed with Trump. They made it abundantly clear that “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” does not apply to all people in America, but only citizens.
The amendment also wasn’t even interpreted in the way it is today until after the framers themselves had all passed away. Congress had to pass the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 to give Native Americans universal citizenship EXPLICITLY because the 14th amendment was understood to not apply to everyone in our country.
This just goes to show that traitors like ACB aren’t voting based on “originalism” like some are trying to claim. The true originalist constitutional position is Trumps view, Barrett is just a liberal feminist who just happens to be pro life.
@adammocklerr You forgot to continue highlighting, "and of the State wherein they reside."
Violating US law and gaining citizenship is not what the 14th Amendment was explicitly stating. As well as the writers stating it was the Amendment was for freed slaves, not foreigners
@wldchld512 Now if the same woman now crosses the border and gives birth 5 minutes later, you are saying there is a logical argument that it magically confers US citizenship?
Furthermore, the writers of the 14th Amendment were very clear the amendment does NOT apply to foreigners
@wldchld512 You can be born here and not subject to the jurisdiction thereof. If a pregnant woman is standing at the US/Mexico border on Mexico territory, they are not subject to US jurisdiction.
@acnewsitics Because most families came through a port of entry, applied for citizenship, and was granted by the US. NOT medical tourism for pregnant moms
You ignorant fuck
@CoachBroker Let's spell it out
Being an American citizen holds a special place for most people. We inherently have more rights than most people on the face of the earth. That does not mean 9 month pregnant mothers can come here, have a child on taxpayer $, and magically have an American kid
The idea that a pregnant woman from Guatemala can sprint across the US border, have the baby 30 minutes after arriving here, and the baby is magically a citizen of the US, is one of the most retarded and indefensible notions ever conceived