@eyeofbass@ElonClipsX Yeah you clearly didn't read what the AI said. Also, AI regularly wrong about easily verifiable info. Even within it's own paragraphs. "Yes they had a prototype" "Elon joined in Feb '04" "First Prototype July '04".
You think you're dunking, but the ball is bouncing off the rim.
@wootini@LordsManor Now that the update is out I wonder if your opinion has changed. Mine certainly has. I was initially annoyed by it, but once the ball gets rolling it really doesn't bother me at all.
@opticalfussion@realDailyTrite@acnewsitics Yup. Legal standing is irrelevant. All that matters is whether or not you believe Christ is the son of God, that he died to bridge the gap between us and God and was then raised to show his sacrifice was perfect and accepted.
@B_Funk_@natetzu@EricLDaugh Couple things: first, the company is called TSMC. Secondly, comparing the build time of an enormous state of the art microchip fabrication plant to a factory for toys, appliances or furniture is a laughably bad idea. As Nate said, Giga Texas produced cars in less than 2 years.
@BufordPerry56@capeandcowell The price of the stock is irrelevant if their income is diminishing. Investors can prop up a company for years before the money men finally give up and the cards collapse. Its something like the last 7 movies put out by Disney and its subsidiaries have lost money.
@elijahrandis @MattWalshBlog that...that is exactly what this thread is about. His exact point is the media is reporting what they want and not actually what the study says.
@jessedriftwood1 @RyanHafey@MattWalshBlog I think our definition of bully may be different. Refusing to let someone squirm out of a question is not being a bully.
@jessedriftwood1 @RyanHafey@MattWalshBlog I'm not sure I would agree that the 'scientists', who are firmly in the grasp of an ideology, being funded by special interest groups who also align to that ideology, publishing papers steel manning that ideology are reliable sources. Cigarettes are healthy, remember?
@jessedriftwood1 @RyanHafey@MattWalshBlog I couldn't possibly disagree with the necessity of more precise wording, but clubbing people with pedantry is not helpful. Especially when you already know damn well what they mean.
@jessedriftwood1 @RyanHafey@MattWalshBlog do not fit into those categorizations neatly. That's fine. They are not less valid humans for that. But what we're seeing now is a deliberate attempt to undermine what was a cultural identity for the sake of what? A lie? Who is really helped by being told a lie? The liar. 2/2
@jessedriftwood1 @RyanHafey@MattWalshBlog Because gender identity (more specifically, personality) is directly influenced by sex. We have self organized into binary cultural categorizations for what is 'accepted' for men and women since the dawn of civilization. There have always been and will always be people who 1/x
@SageThinker99@Rando_Webb@EJohns03@VivekGRamaswamy Sage, look at the earliest written records we have access to and it paints humanity in the exact some light I am. We've been doing this forever. We will continue to do it forever. Nurture is powerful, but so is nature. I think you're too optimistic in dismissing it.
@SageThinker99@Rando_Webb@EJohns03@VivekGRamaswamy I did understand. My counterpoint was that while both may be inborn in everyone, selfishness is more powerful, more primal than charity. Scarcity may play a part, but even when they were less than 300mn people on the planet we still fought and killed each other.
@JamesMo19320924 @reddychintu547 @jessedriftwood1 @RyanHafey@MattWalshBlog He's trying to prove classifications are extremely difficult to pin down with 100% accuracy. Which, while true, is entirely unhelpful for basically every practical application known to man.