In 1986, There Were Only 3 Vaccines...DTaP, MMR & Polio. They Were So Harmful That The Manufacturers Faced Bankruptcy Because of Vaccine Injury Lawsuits.
The U.S. Congress... Instead Of Forcing Vaccine Makers To Make A Safe Product, They Chose To Give Full Immunity For Those 3 & All Future Vaccines.
There Are Now 72-96 Doses Of Vaccines On The Childhood Vaccination Schedule & 13 Vaccines On The Adult Vaccination Schedule Totaling 24 Doses.
With No Liability & Full Legal Immunity, Vaccine Manufacturers Have The Right To Make & Inject You With 100s Of Unsafe & Toxic Ingredients Such As These:
Polysorbate 80
Thimerosal Mercury
Aluminum
Formaldehyde
M59 Squalene
Acetone
Sodium Borate (Borax)
2-Phenoxyethanol
SV40
Triton X-100
Bovine Calf Serum
Porcine Gelatin
Poultry Serum
Poultry Byproducts
Yeast
Latex
mRNA
DNA Fragments
Animal Organ DNA In Vaccines:
MDCK: Madin Darby Canine Kidney, female Cocker Spaniel
VERO: African Green Monkey Kidney
FRHL: Fetal Rhesus Monkey Lung
CHO: Chinese Hamster Ovary
PK-15: Pork Kidney
RK-13: Rabbit Kidney
SIRC: Rabbit Cornea
SF-9: Fall Armyworm Ovary
The vaccine industry is built on the use of aborted babies organs to produce the vaccines we use today…and they have to replace these lines with current aborted organs.
The most recent harvested human organ for vaccine research is WALVAX-2 which is a harvested lung from a 3 month old unborn baby taken in 2015. This was one baby of 10 in total, in which organs were harvested for research & vaccine development.
⬇️ these are the 'code names' for harvested organs used to make vaccines, their original source & what vaccines they are used in:
HEK-293: Human Embryo Kidney, aborted female; used in development of Ebola & Covid
MRC-5: Human Lung, 14 week old aborted male; used in Polio, Rabies, Chickenpox, Hep A & Shingles
WI-38: Human Lung, 12 week old aborted female; used in Polio, Rabies, Chickenpox, Hep A & Shingles
RA 27-3: Human Kidney, 6 weeks old, used in the Rubella & MMR
PER-C6: Human Retina, 18 weeks old, used in the development of Ebola & Covid
IMR-90: Lung from a 16 week old fetus; to replace the WI-38 line
WALVAX-2: Lung from a 3 month old fetus; to replace the WI-38 and MRC-5 line
Upper Caste : What is your caste ?
Lower Caste : No Caste, We are Hindu.
Upper Caste : Not religion. Tell me your caste.
Lower Caste : We are Paswan Hindu.
Then, 20–25 upper-caste people together beat lower caste boy badly.
But saar we are Hindu saar, no caste saar. 🚩😍
#BILLGATES: DIGITAL IDENTITY WILL CONTROL EVERYTHING — YOUR BODY, YOUR MONEY, YOUR FOOD, AND YOUR VACCINES WILL DECIDE WHETHER YOU HAVE THE "RIGHT TO LIVE" OR ARE CUT OFF!
RESIST. DON'T BEND.
Video was deleted again that's why i'm posting it again.
Police can now check your fingerprints anywhere, in 35 seconds, using the new Abhigyan app. The law it rests on is still under challenge. We have sought a rollback. Here's why.
The most brainwashed medical community! They read books for 5+ years and their critical thinking is totally dead!
They got vaccinated and advised many to get vaccinated. The disaster that started in 2021 is nowhere near to stopping
🚨🇮🇱👁️💥Urgent : Israël a largué un nouveau type de bombes à Gaza. Les Palestiniens la décrivent comme une « bombe nucléaire miniature », mais l'analyse indique qu'il s'agit probablement d'une arme thermobarique (à vide). Israël viole le droit international
You’re telling me:
They can locate the exact coordinates & kill the Supreme leader of 🇮🇷,
They can locate & kidnap the President of 🇻🇪 in an early morning raid,
They can locate & kill a cartel boss in the middle of a forest...
But they can't locate or arrest Epstein clients?
Statement by the Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) on Delhi Police Notices to X (formerly Twitter) Seeking User Data in FIR No. 135/2026
The Internet Freedom Foundation is deeply concerned by reports that Delhi Police has written to X seeking expansive identifying information for multiple social media accounts. The demand is in connection with with FIR No. 135/2026 registered at PS IP Estate, Central Delhi (dated 24.03.2026) under Sections 316(4) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 72A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. These notices publicly shared and now under scrutiny target several X handles, including @khurpenchh, @YTKDIndia, @gemsofbabus_, @IamTheStory__, and @NalinisKitchen (among others).
They seek not just basic subscriber information but highly intrusive details including, mobile numbers and emails used for registration, full IP logs with ports for all active sessions since account creation, recovery emails, and “any other information”. Such sweeping demands go far beyond what is necessary or proportionate for any legitimate investigation such as basic subscriber information that may be legitimately requested.
The FIR itself raises serious concerns about misuse of criminal law against online expression. From information available in the public domain it alleges that posts on X by these handles were published with “malicious intent to defame” a victim (referred to as “her”), causing “chaos before the public,” and that certain “highly confidential” details were “stolen” and disclosed. The invoked sections, BNS 316(4) (criminal breach of trust by a clerk/servant, carrying up to 7 years’ imprisonment) read with 3(5) (common intention/joint liability), and IT Act 72A (disclosure of information in breach of lawful contract) appear stretched and ill-suited to the facts.
A prima facia analysis of the specific posts referenced in the notices (e.g., content from @khurpenchh dated around 10 March 2026) shows they involve public-interest exposes alleging irregularities in appointments at FSSAI (Food Safety and Standards Authority of India). Far from baseless defamation, these appear to be critical commentary and allegations of possible malpractices in public employment, which are protected forms of speech under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.
Resorting to criminal provisions meant for breach of trust by employees or contractual disclosures to unmask critics sets a dangerous precedent. If the core grievance is reputational harm then a statement by the government body or even perhaps in extreme situation civil remedies (such as a defamation suit) would suffice. Instead, the police have chosen the criminal route, which carries the threat of arrest, investigation, and chilling effects. This is a classic case of weaponising criminal law to suppress scrutiny of public officials and institutions.
The data demands pose grave privacy risks under Article 21 of the Constitution. Requiring IP logs, port details, and session history since account creation enables not just identification but comprehensive tracking of users’ digital footprints. In an era of pervasive surveillance, this could expose critics, journalists, or whistleblowers to harassment, doxxing, or retaliation especially when the accounts appear to be anonymous voices highlighting alleged systemic issues.
Further, X (as an intermediary) is being asked to hand over data without adequate judicial oversight or necessity demonstration, echoing patterns IFF has repeatedly flagged in cases involving Section 69 of the IT Act or CrPC/BNSS notices. Such bulk, open-ended requests (“any other information”) violate the principles of necessity, proportionality, and minimal intrusion laid down by the Supreme Court in K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) and subsequent digital rights jurisprudence.
We must remember that anonymous or pseudonymous accounts play a vital role in India’s online discourse, enabling fearless criticism of power without fear of reprisal. By pursuing these handles through police notices and FIRs, the authorities send a clear message that you question the system at your peril. The affected users have rightly described this as a “witch hunt.” IFF echoes that concern.
At a time when digital spaces are among the few remaining avenues for robust public debate, such actions erode the foundational guarantee of free speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a). They also undermine trust in law enforcement, turning routine criticism into criminal investigations that drain resources better spent on real crimes. IFF will continue monitoring this case. Freedom of expression on the internet is not a privilege but a constitutional right that must be fiercely protected against overreach.
Internet Freedom Foundation
New Delhi
02 April 2026
Brace up Indians ..
We are now in an undeclared Emergency.. and it’s not a joke anymore
If you criticise this regime , FIR will be filed against you
Tyrants are scared of your voice, so they will silence you ..
Cowards!
🚨 THE CIA HAS BEEN POISONING THE SKY AND CONTROLLING THE WEATHER SINCE 1965! ☣️
The CIA launched full-scale chemtrail operations in 1965.
Unmarked jets. Toxic nano-particles. Aluminum. Barium. Strontium. Weather-modification chemicals. Sprayed daily over every major population center to:
- Weaponize hurricanes and steer storms toward political enemies
- Crash food production by poisoning soil and crops
- Block sunlight to "fight climate change" while destroying vitamin D levels and immune systems
- Keep the masses docile, sick, and dependent
Project Stormfury was the fake public face. Operation Popeye proved they could flood entire countries. But 1965 is when the real program went dark: total atmospheric domination plus population control.
Those long-lasting trails that turn blue skies into milky haze for hours? Not condensation. That's poison falling on your family, your water, your lungs.
They rebranded it "geoengineering" to sound scientific. It's chemical warfare against civilians. The patents are public. Declassified documents exist. Whistleblowers have died trying to warn us.
They've been laughing from Langley while we breathe their cocktail of death for six decades.
WAKE UP. LOOK UP. FILM IT. SHARE IT. The grid patterns in the sky today are not random. They're orders being carried out.