BREAKING: James Talarico just released an incredible video reminding every American what hope feels like. This is the best political ad we've seen in a long time.
🚨 BREAKING: Donald Trump keeps mocking his faith, and he just answered with the most fearless ad of this campaign: "Prayer."
Abdul El-Sayed is not running from his faith. He is running on it.
@DeFinanceChick@rachelknows26@Spiltea That actually makes it more unlikely. They started reheating her body before arriving at the hospital; she was likely lower on scene.
I don’t even want to post this. People are rabid. But I’m doing it anyway because the lost time thing keeps coming up.
If you actually watched the trial you’d know this isn’t straightforward.
This version of events could explain the missing time.
This is one of the worst investigations I’ve ever seen.
There isn’t even a chain of custody coming from law enforcement and warrants.
Evidence got entered because the husband provided it. Trust me bro.
They never once mentioned the Shortcuts app. That can time a call for the future made from the lockscreen.
Would’ve made way more sense if someone was trying to plot a route. Or schedule a future call.
Cellebrite experts would’ve had to specifically search for that option to even see it. Doesn’t look like they did. They said in trial this isn’t a full search parameter and it depends on what they enter into their searches and inquiries.
All the alibi stuff happened at CVS.
The Commonwealth has been hanging their whole case on him leaving at 5:15 since the first arraignment.
He backtracked on this during the trial.
Timeline dead.
Flights climbed can be entered in by hand. There were multiple devices.
There’s more.
If you’re coming at me because you claim she confessed, you’re wrong.
Did you look into the bifurcated motion that was denied? Or too lazy?
I already know what’s coming in the comments. Hitler. Every other lazy insult. Because half of you are just repeating whatever’s trending. ✌🏼
@jefford73@pierce_zimmer@BrianEntin Because Redington tried to get the trial bifurcated and the judge denied it. He was arguing NGRI for the benefit of his client under those circumstances. Had the trial been bifurcated her defense in the first part could have (and likely would have) been entirely different.
What if you’re wrong?
When the headlines first broke about Lindsay Clancy, I didn't plan to watch. As much as I distrust legacy media, a headline of that magnitude makes you think - they must have definitive proof. The reality is, they didn’t and after 3 1/2 years they still don’t. They don't have proof of who did it and they don't have proof of when these horrific crimes were committed.
The state chose a conclusion that night and in less than 24 hours, while Lindsay lay unconscious in a hospital bed, they charged her with a triple homicide because Patrick said it happened during the 37 minutes he was not home. They have since spent three and a half years trying to force the evidence to fit a narrative spun on night one.
The media sold you a story, but the math and science completely shatter it. Patrick’s errands are meaningless until they can provide a scientifically based estimated time of death for the children. You cannot have an alibi when the state doesn't even know the times of death. Thus, his errands are just errands and do not clear him.
Critics will immediately scream, “But she confessed!” No, she didn't. Legally, she entered a plea of Not Guilty. The reality is her track seems predetermined which should terrify everyone.
For reasons we don’t understand, her defense attorney chose an insanity path after she was entirely isolated from her family for two weeks. Think about the math here: a woman with no prior psychiatric history goes to a doctor for postpartum anxiety, is placed on thirteen different drugs in four months, and is suddenly labeled insane. Any cognitive break would be an acute, chemically induced toxicity from that pharmaceutical conveyor belt. It would not be an inherent defect.
By rushing onto an insanity track before the state's forensics were even completed, the defense conceded the physical acts from the beginning. It was a legal strategy that allowed the DA to bypass critical pieces of physical evidence. Lindsay never took the stand to state she committed those acts.
Under any standard triple homicide protocol, this investigation should still be wide open. Both parents are still suspects.
Shame on the DA and shame on the media for lying to the public for 3 1/2 years. The public accepted your headlines. They never imagined you would completely manipulate the facts and manufacture something this horrific.
If you watch this upcoming 60 Minutes interview and accept an emotional performance as a substitute for real forensic answers, you are allowing yourself to continue to be manipulated.
When we allow emotional headlines to manufacture a reality without actual physical data, we are permitting a broken system to shield the truth and potentially hold the wrong person responsible.
We have to go back to day one, look at the actual handling of this investigation, and demand the truth. Anything less is a betrayal to the Clancy children and a betrayal to yourself.
Diesel fuel is at record prices, you need a home equity loan to buy a friggin pot roast, our soldiers are dying in the middle east, China and Japan are dumping our bonds, measles and diarrhea lettuce are spreading like wildfire, and you silly fuckers want us to reelect the MAGAs?
@KendallSals Im saying the older 2 were gone before he left, baby was done when he got back. That’s how they were able to revive him temporarily. And I don’t think she went out the window voluntarily, I think she was sedated/unconscious when she went out because she didn’t brace for impact.
@minxychi@BrianEntin That’s incorrect. So that’s probably why. One of the 5 options is straight up not guilty. The prosecution still had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that she did it.