A brief history about Labour:
1945 - Labour elected
1947 - Britain Bankrupt
1964 - Labour elected
1970 - Britain Bankrupt
1974 - Labour elected
1979 - Britain Bankrupt
1997 - Labour elected
2010 - Britain Bankrupt
2024 Labour elected...
IT HASN'T WORKED, IT NEVER WILL. 🇬🇧
🚨NEWS: Migrants in Calais have told reporters that if the UK did instant deportations they wouldn't bother trying to cross the channel
"'We're not going to spend £5,000 to a people smuggler to know we're going to end up back in Africa'."
@PatrickChristys@GBNEWS There's still accounts on TikTok advertising the crossings showing their Whatsapp number, if they wanted to catch them they could 🤬. They just don't want the public to know whats going on. Keep up the great work 🥰
@CountBinface is everything he accuses Farage of — only worse.
Stole the Lord Buckethead character until the rights holder shut him down.
Kept the exact same act and called it original.
Took an undisclosed sum of up to £180k from Labour donor Dale Vince.
A BBC comedy writer in a bin lid, bankrolled by the donor class, sold by the media as the radical outsider.
The grift isn’t the politics.
The grift is the costume.
@Nigel_Farage@DaleVince #Clacton
🚨 Dominic Cummings said:
"Whitehall will break the law to prevent Reform UK winning power. They'll leak medical records, tax records. They'll bug his phone and leak that. They'll do anything that they need to."
Just a reminder
Breaking News🇬🇧⚡️: "I don't see Kemi and the Tories as the problem, it's the civil service that are to blame".
Here is Restore Party Leader Rupert Lowe explaining how the Tories aren't to blame for the destruction of the UK - it's the civil service.
Source: @danwootton
The Tories were in power for fourteen years. If they were trying to implement policies that were hampered or blocked, then every civil servant who was complicit should have been fired. The Tories are responsible for the current state of this country. Never trust them again.
The man arrested is an Afghan national who reportedly met Elisabeth Ross through her work helping refugees in Greece. Her body was found in a suitcase in an abandoned car park. The Afghan man also withdrew money from her bank cards, which helped police to track him down.
The leader of the Green Party shared a call for Nigel Farage to be BEHEADED.
To 700,000 people. Two weeks after an MP was murdered. Then went on live TV, refused to apologise, and made himself the VICTIM.
All he had to do was say one word. He couldn't and every reason makes it worse.
His defence? Farage cropped it to make it LOOK like I posted it. So here's how Instagram actually works, Zack. A collab stays HIDDEN. You get a notification, tap REVIEW, see the full post, and only THEN press ACCEPT. The second you do, it publishes under your name to all your followers.
No accident in that chain. You SEE it. You CHOOSE it and he said it himself. “I shouldn't have ACCEPTED that collaboration.” There's the whole game, in his own word. He previewed a man in a T-shirt calling for Farage's beheading, and pressed accept. To 700,000 people.
Watch the word he hides behind. COLLABORATION. As if it drifted onto his page like weather. But you review it, approve it, publish it. He didn't get caught. He CHOSE it.
His party says he accepted a 20-image post without realising. A leader who didn't check what he sent to 700,000? That's not a defence. That's the job abandoned.
This was no ambush. Not GB News. The BBC. Victoria Derbyshire, one of the straightest interviewers in the country, on Newsnight. She offered him the easiest out on live TV. Do you want to apologise? She asked it four times. Four times he refused.
When even a neutral BBC journalist can’t get you to say sorry for sharing a beheading, the problem was never the interview.
Then the excuse that should end him. It only got 1,000 likes, until Farage amplified it. So the beheading image was fine, as long as few WATCHED. The problem isn't what he shared. It's that people SAW.
Then the logic folds in. If I'd done it deliberately I'd apologise, he said, but because it was a mistake, I won't. We say sorry for mistakes BECAUSE they're mistakes.
Here’s the real reason. In his words, the moment he apologises, Farage runs all over social media. So it's not principle. It's TACTICS. A call for a man's beheading goes unapologised for, to save a campaign.
Even his OWN party apologised FOR him. He still wouldn't say it.
Now the part nobody else will touch. This is the man who warned Britain was descending into AUTHORITARIANISM, who calls our liberties “not negotiable,” who rails against arresting people for posts.
Until the post was his. Now he's reported to police, and suddenly he's the VICTIM. Free speech for me. The full weight of the law for you.
Lucy Connolly posted a call to set fire to asylum hotels, deleted it within hours, apologised, and got 31 MONTHS. A party leader shares a call for a man’s beheading, deletes it only when it trends, won’t apologise, and so far faces nothing.
Both posts called for violence. Only one person went to prison.
Same country. Two rules.
So what is he, this man who won't say one word?
It's ARROGANCE. The belief he sits above the accountability demanded of everyone else.
It's COWARDICE, and he admitted it. He won't apologise because it would cost him. Fear wearing a suit.
It's CONTEMPT. For you, the public, the murdered. That you'll just forget.
It's NARCISSISM. He shares the blade, then rewrites the story until HE is the wounded one and underneath it all, SHAMELESSNESS. A person with shame apologises. He feels none.
Not brave. Not principled. The smallest kind of coward. The kind who dresses it up as courage.
The mask didn't slip. He pressed accept on it and still couldn't manage one word.
SORRY. He couldn’t manage the word.
Lenny Henry is demanding reparations from the UK to be paid to Africa for slavery.
No one in my family ever owned a slave so I think I’m exempt.
Who’s paying?
Una presentadora multimillonaria exige a Elon Musk que done su fortuna... Quedo destrozada con la respuesta que le dieron.
«¿Qué hace Elon Musk con su dinero? Va a ser trillonario. Podría salvar países enteros. ¿Lo va a hacer? No. ¿Es que crees que vas a vivir para siempre, Elon?
—Un par de apuntes, Joy. Menos del 0,1% del patrimonio de Elon es dinero en el banco. El 99,9% restante son acciones y propiedad de sus empresas: SpaceX, Tesla y otras.
Esas empresas han creado más de 160.000 empleos directos, 600.000 indirectos y 500.000 más inducidos. Al menos 1 millón de personas en el mundo ponen pan en su mesa gracias a ellas.
Tú, en cambio, tienes 30 millones de dólares. No has creado empleos. Y casi todo tu dinero está listo para gastarse.
¿Vas a vivir para siempre, Joy? ¿Por qué no regalas TÚ tu dinero? Con un tercio podrías alimentar a 3.000 personas un año entero.
¿Cuándo empieza tu donación?»
Jameela Jamil Wants a Verdict on History. History Doesn't Give Simple Ones
Jameela Jamil says British people are "the most evil people in history." She compares Britain to Thanos, the genocidal supervillain from the Marvel comic book franchise. It's a claim that asks to be tested, not against Britain's record alone, but against the standard "most evil" implies: worse than everyone, everywhere, always. That standard doesn't survive contact with the twentieth century, and it doesn't survive contact with the history of the subcontinent Jamil claims to speak for either.
Start with the century she's actually living in the shadow of. It gave the world the Holocaust, the Holodomor, the Cambodian killing fields, and Mao's Great Leap Forward, a policy that starved tens of millions of Chinese peasants through famine engineered by ideology. None of that requires defending the British Empire's record, which has real crimes attached to it. It requires noticing that "most evil in history" is a superlative, and superlatives need to survive comparison. This one doesn't.
Nor does the idea that the subcontinent's own history is free of the kind of violence Jamil reserves for Britain alone. The caste system, a hierarchy that predates British rule and outlasted it, subjected so-called "untouchables" to systematic exclusion, forced labour and violence for centuries, a practice that persists in parts of India today despite decades of law aimed at ending it. Sati, the practice of burning widows alive on their husbands' funeral pyres, was widespread enough in parts of India that the British colonial government banned it by law in 1829, a detail that sits awkwardly against any narrative in which Britain supplies only cruelty and India only its victims.
Partition itself, in 1947, deserves care rather than a simple verdict. Historians still argue over how much blame lies with Britain's rushed and poorly managed withdrawal versus the communal violence that followed it, and serious scholarship puts the death toll anywhere between 200,000 and over three million, with mass rape and abduction on all sides, Hindu, Muslim and Sikh alike. Nobody serious blames "India" for this the way Jamil blames "Britain" for empire. But that's precisely the point: history this complicated resists the kind of single-word verdict, evil, that Jamil is reaching for.
None of this is offered as a scorecard, as though enough atrocities on one side cancel out another's. It's offered because "most evil in history" is a category that collapses the moment you actually apply it to any nation with a few centuries of history behind it. Every old civilisation, every empire, every subcontinent carries chapters its descendants would rather not examine too closely. Singling out one country for the superlative, while treating your own historical and ancestral ground as innocent by comparison, isn't a reckoning with history. It's a selective one.
None of this requires pretending colonial history is closed or comfortable. It isn't, and serious historians continue to argue over the scale of what was extracted from India under British rule. That argument deserves to happen on its actual terms, weighed against the actual historical record on every side of it, not through a comparison to a comic book villain on a podcast.
What Jamil offered wasn't a reckoning with empire. It was a maximalist claim that only works if you don't look too closely at anyone's history, including her own. The twentieth century has genuine contenders for its worst chapters. So, in quieter and more complicated ways, does every old civilisation on earth. "Most evil in history" isn't an accounting. It's a headline that only survives if nobody checks it.
"Jameela Jamil says British people are "the most evil people in history." She compares Britain to Thanos, the genocidal supervillain from the Marvel comic book franchise."
When they opened the borders to eye wateringly vast amounts of immigration without giving any consideration to the problems this will cause downstream, this is what you get: oil and water. "Akhmed Yakoob says deporting Shabir Ahmed, a man convicted of raping children as young as twelve, would amount to "appeasing the far-Right."". His thinking here is simply alien. By this I mean that know matter how hard I try to think flexibly about what he means by this, I am not able to understand this from his perspective and think "yes I can see the point he is trying to make here". I just don't have the cultural lens to make any sense of this. "Appeasing the far-right". The irony of those words right there is beyond astonishing. Appeasement got us into this mess in the first place and this reveals just how far the state has drifted because of no boundary setting whatsoever. Sectarian politics is now in the bloodstream of British politics and this story is just one example of this. We have imported hatred of the Jews en-masse and it infuriates me. This country is in one hell of a mess and I often think we have gone past the point of no return. Again, Lebanon springs to mind.
They thought NO ONE was filming.
Four government ministers, paid by YOU to protect you, huddled together and LAUGHING about letting criminals back onto your streets.
Wes Streeting. Shabana Mahmood. Yvette Cooper. Alex Norris, the brand new JUSTICE SECRETARY.
"He wants to let them all out." Then they LAUGH.
So, Letting criminals back onto your streets is the PUNCHLINE. The joke. The thing that gets a chuckle between mates before they move on to chatting about their swearing-in ceremonies.
Not the VICTIMS. Not the families. Not the people who'll live next door to whoever "them" turns out to be.
Just a laugh, shared quietly, when they thought nobody was listening.
This is who they are when they think the cameras are off. Relaxed. Matey. AMUSED. Handling your safety like it's the setup to a joke.
SHAME on you. All of you. Families are burying people. Women are checking over their shoulders walking home in the dark. And you're stood in a huddle LAUGHING.
It's DISGUSTING. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
Remember it. Because this is the version they never meant for you to SEE.
Saudi Arabia restricted Tablighi Jamaat (the group behind most Ijtimas) in 2021. Its Ministry of Islamic Affairs called the movement a "danger to society" and "one of the gates of terrorism," citing doctrinal clashes with Wahhabism and extremism risks. Central Asian countries like Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan have banned it for similar reasons over its puritanical preaching. TJ itself stresses non-violent personal reform and dawah.
The recent UK Ijtima faced separate right-wing threats, which police addressed with arrests and an early close.
🚨 BREAKING: THE £38 BILLION LABOUR TAX RAID HAS JUST LEAKED.
Good morning to the millions of everyday, hardworking Brits waking up this Monday morning to an absolute financial slaughter.
Andy Burnham is preparing to launch a massive, unprecedented £38 billion tax raid the second he takes the keys to Number 10 this Friday. 🤡
This brings Labour's total tax grab to a staggering £104 billion every single year when combined with Rachel Reeves's previous business raids.
Reform UK has just exposed his planned torrent of new taxes that were completely hidden from the manifesto.
He is preparing to slap a 10% death tax on family homes, align capital gains tax with income tax, and hit landlords with National Insurance to drive up your rents.
He is even lowering the mansion tax threshold to just £1.5 million to drag ordinary middle-class homeowners into higher rates.
They are treating the British public like a bottomless ATM to fund their out-of-control, socialist spending spree.
If Burnham has the audacity to impose £38 billion of brand-new, undemocratic taxes on your family, he has absolutely zero mandate to govern.
We do not want a backroom coronation. We want a vote.
RT if you demand an immediate General Election to stop this robbery and take our country back! 🔁🇬🇧🔥
As someone who has driven to Devon from Sheffield, it is a horrible journey, 300 miles.
If traffic is clear, it's roughly 5 hours.
He left his home at 7:50. Police have stated that Ann was attacked at 12:30. That's 4 hours 40 to get down, enter the property and attack her. He's done all that in 4 hours and 40 minutes.
It just feels impossible to do so if it wasn't premeditated.
From Rotherham at 7:50, you're hitting traffic straight away getting on the motorway, that sits in-between Sheffield and Rotherham; and then driving down the M1 past Nottingham and Derby without hitting traffic at 8:30, then cutting through Birmingham at 9am.
What I mean is, he must have not stopped off. He must have already filled the car up.
Because any stopping at that journey time is just impossible. It's 4:35 on a clear run, according to maps.
So you're telling me, a man gets in his car with a wooden stick and drives straight 300 miles at warp speed, directly to her home, and beats her to death. And that wasn't political.
Come on. Anyone with the slightest bit of reasoning knows this is political