@horseshoetrl@Bkclaims Deals they would quote me were generally 3% origination on invested capital. If it was 6% that but the hurdles were extremely attractive for developers on shitty deals...sorry cuspy. But something was always just too slippery to ever even entertain it.
YO PEEPS!!!,
Another Giveaway from @SMITEGame to The People,
1x SMITE 2 Lord Slashington III Fenrir
1x Rise of the Gods Premium Wandering Market
To enter:
-Follow Me @Kingkmanthe1st on X
-Subscribe To My YouTube Channel: https://t.co/gh2DBROrt7
(Screenshot It & Send It via DM To Verify That You Subscribed)
-Like this tweet
-Retweet this tweet
-Comment if you’d like the Premium ⛽or the Top Hat 🎩 Fenrir
Winners will be drawn on the Feb 22nd at 9:30pm CST
Good Fortune To Ya & See you on the Battleground of the Gods
@TripleNetInvest The only way it makes sense is as a covered land play in land constrained markets. The fee in the land in theory should be protected because Callaway leverages their leased fee into a leasehold generally with an entertainment REIT. They end up investing almost $40M into LH IMP
@realEstateTrent LTV is less relevant (regardless of acq cash in) than DY, DSCR, exit uw and quite candidly rollover risk - locations are so much more important as well - nobody is stretching .... that's worth borrowing from.
@realEstateTrent There are just more variables to unpack - escalations with cpi adjustments or fixed adjustments, full term IO vs mortgage constant - again conceptually speaking don't disagree just there are layers like 10% cap might be a hunk of shit that provides no real exit but positive lev.