TheSaffronWave

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

@thatPunekar हा रोहित पवार बेड वर झोपले आहेत का? जसं लहान बाळ बेड वरून झोपेत खाली पडु नये म्हणून जसं साईडला लोड लावतात तसा लोड रोहित पवार शेजारी लावला आहे!

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

Pakistan is now going to surpass America and China and become a superpower by selling 6.1 million of its donkeys to China.

#Pakistan #China #ChinaStopAnimalCruelty

https://t.co/A1vq1oPEOs

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

Pakistan is now going to surpass America and China and become a superpower by selling 6.1 million of its donkeys to China.

#Pakistan #China #ChinaStopAnimalCruelty

https://t.co/A1vq1oPEOs

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

@INCMaharashtra @INCIndia @RahulGandhi @sirivellaprasad @INCHarshsapkal बाथरूम मध्ये एंटोनिया माइनो काय मुजरा करत होती का?

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

@jpsin1 अगर कप्तान स्मिथ मच्छर के बजाय कोई अब्दुल होता तो दिन रात ट्विट करते।

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

@INCIndia जॉर्ज सोरोस के दलाल को किस जेल में डालने है इस बारे में सोचिए।

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

When Shahrukh Khan praised the bravery of Captain Smit Machchhar, the troll army of our country started trolling Shahrukh Khan.

Shahrukh Khan had only praised Captain Smit Machchhar and had not taken part in a Hindu religious festival, yet why did the troll army start trolling Shahrukh Khan on this issue this is a big and serious question.

Shah Rukh Khan is an Indian citizen, and the Constitution grants him the right to freedom of expression. However, what he should speak about and what he should not speak about is a personal matter for Shahrukh Khan. The troll army should not tell Shahrukh Khan which issues he should speak on and which issues he should not speak on.

Captain Smit Machchhar is a Hindu as well as an Indian, and a person who considers India his own country should take pride in Captain Smit Machchhar.

Perhaps those who do not consider India their own country do not take pride in the bravery of Captain Smit Machchhar.

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

When Shahrukh Khan praised the bravery of Captain Smit Machchhar, the troll army of our country started trolling Shahrukh Khan.

Shahrukh Khan had only praised Captain Smit Machchhar and had not taken part in a Hindu religious festival, yet why did the troll army start trolling Shahrukh Khan on this issue this is a big and serious question.

Shah Rukh Khan is an Indian citizen, and the Constitution grants him the right to freedom of expression. However, what he should speak about and what he should not speak about is a personal matter for Shahrukh Khan. The troll army should not tell Shahrukh Khan which issues he should speak on and which issues he should not speak on.

Captain Smit Machchhar is a Hindu as well as an Indian, and a person who considers India his own country should take pride in Captain Smit Machchhar.

Perhaps those who do not consider India their own country do not take pride in the bravery of Captain Smit Machchhar.

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

@KanojiaPJ स्वयंघोषित और तथाकथित आंबेडकरवादी आज कोर्ट पर सवाल खड़े कर रहे हैं कल संविधान पर भी सवाल खड़े कर सकते हैं।

@KanojiaPJ

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

The country is watching. In the name of investigative journalism, a constitutional institution is being targeted, and the moment the curtain lifts, the question stops at the money.

In the expenditure statement submitted by the Congress to the Election Commission, a payment of nearly ₹81.45 lakh to The Indian Express is recorded during the West Bengal elections. The same newspaper, which calls itself Journalism of Courage, is running such reporting on Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and the Election Commission that questions are raised about the institution’s credibility and the opposition’s narrative is strengthened.

This is not a coincidence. It is a sequence. First the money in the name of advertising, then the attack in the name of an “exposé.” When the money comes from one side and the arrows fly the other way, it is not called courage. It is called a deal.

Democracy runs on the freedom of the media, not on media contracts. Readers have the right to know which report is in the public interest and which is part of a sponsored campaign. The documents are public. The questions should be public too.

Journalism of Courage, or Journalism for Cash? The Congress should answer. The Indian Express should answer.

#JournalismForCash #IndianExpress #Congress #CEC #ElectionCommission

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

The country is watching. In the name of investigative journalism, a constitutional institution is being targeted, and the moment the curtain lifts, the question stops at the money.

In the expenditure statement submitted by the Congress to the Election Commission, a payment of nearly ₹81.45 lakh to The Indian Express is recorded during the West Bengal elections. The same newspaper, which calls itself Journalism of Courage, is running such reporting on Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and the Election Commission that questions are raised about the institution’s credibility and the opposition’s narrative is strengthened.

This is not a coincidence. It is a sequence. First the money in the name of advertising, then the attack in the name of an “exposé.” When the money comes from one side and the arrows fly the other way, it is not called courage. It is called a deal.

Democracy runs on the freedom of the media, not on media contracts. Readers have the right to know which report is in the public interest and which is part of a sponsored campaign. The documents are public. The questions should be public too.

Journalism of Courage, or Journalism for Cash? The Congress should answer. The Indian Express should answer.

#JournalismForCash #IndianExpress #Congress #CEC #ElectionCommission

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

While the entire world is praising Captain Smit Machhar’s courage in which, despite being injured, he stood firm in the cockpit and saved the aircraft and the lives of the passengers Congress MP Imran Masood is dismissing it as “NO BRAVERY, JUST BJP’S CELEBRATION.”

Rahul Gandhi and the Congress high command are silent on this statement. The question is not of religion, but of the act itself. The valour that the international media and world leaders are honouring is being downplayed by Congress leaders. Had the same act been performed by a pilot with a different name, the party’s tone today would have been different. Placing the party’s calculations above national pride is an old habit of the Congress and this is precisely what prevents it from becoming a credible opposition.

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

While the entire world is praising Captain Smit Machhar’s courage in which, despite being injured, he stood firm in the cockpit and saved the aircraft and the lives of the passengers Congress MP Imran Masood is dismissing it as “NO BRAVERY, JUST BJP’S CELEBRATION.”

Rahul Gandhi and the Congress high command are silent on this statement. The question is not of religion, but of the act itself. The valour that the international media and world leaders are honouring is being downplayed by Congress leaders. Had the same act been performed by a pilot with a different name, the party’s tone today would have been different. Placing the party’s calculations above national pride is an old habit of the Congress and this is precisely what prevents it from becoming a credible opposition.

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

𝐃𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐲 𝐈𝐬 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐈𝐧 𝐖𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚 𝐎𝐟 𝐀𝐧 𝐄𝐩𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐎𝐟 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐱𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐇𝐚𝐬 𝐁𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐆𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐑𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐝𝐥𝐲 𝐓𝐨 𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐲 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐞.

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

𝐃𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐲 𝐈𝐬 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐈𝐧 𝐖𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚 𝐎𝐟 𝐀𝐧 𝐄𝐩𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐎𝐟 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐱𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐇𝐚𝐬 𝐁𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐆𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐑𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐝𝐥𝐲 𝐓𝐨 𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐲 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐞.

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

@ShriRajTripuute If Balasaheb Thackeray ji had not helped, Sanjay Dutt would still be rotting in jail.

[ShriRaj Tripuute @ShriRajTripuute]

Sanjay Dutt’s remarks on Shekhar Suman’s show where he said he no longer feels the same peace and calm in his own country and wished for the return of earlier days call for a courteous but clear response.

Every citizen has the right to express concern about the national atmosphere, and it may suit him to confine a public statement to “scripted humour.” Yet when advice on peace, harmony, and responsibility comes from someone whose own public journey has included recorded tests of law, discipline, and public trust, the comment reads less as analysis and more as irony. The country has, on several occasions, given personal lapses the chance of reform; to then speak of a lack of peace in that same country appears closer to role-playing than to self-reflection.

Respectfully, example carries more weight than exhortation. Humour may be contextual, but accountability for a public statement usually survives the context. One hopes future remarks on the country’s condition will weigh personal experience and the historical record with greater balance.

@duttsanjay

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

संजय दत्त का शेखर सुमन के शो वाला बयान अपने आप में दिलचस्प है। देश में शांति न होने की शिकायत, पुराने दिनों की याद, और फिर मुन्ना भाई बनकर पाँच मिनट का प्रधानमंत्री भाषण सब एक ही मंच पर।

शांति की बात कोई भी कर सकता है। लेकिन जब बोलने वाला वही व्यक्ति हो, जिसे 1993 के मुंबई बम धमाकों से जुड़े मामले में अवैध AK-56 और गोला-बारूद रखने का दोषी ठहराया गया था, तब शब्द अपने वजन से हल्के पड़ जाते हैं। साजिश के आरोप में बरी होना और हथियार रखने की सजा काटना दोनों बातें रिकॉर्ड पर हैं। उस दौर में शहर में शांति नहीं टूटी थी, उसे तोड़ा गया था।

आज वही व्यक्ति गांधी जयंती के मौके पर गांधीगिरी का पाठ पढ़ा रहे हैं, विदेश यात्राओं और पोस्टरों पर व्यंग्य कर रहे हैं। अभिव्यक्ति का अधिकार है, और कलाकार को व्यंग्य करने की छूट भी। पर नैतिक अधिकार और कानूनी रिकॉर्ड एक जैसे नहीं होते। जिस हाथ ने कभी अवैध हथियार सँभाला था, वही हाथ जब देश को शांति का उपदेश दे, तो श्रोता को सिर्फ भाषण नहीं, पूरा इतिहास भी याद रखना चाहिए।

शांति की प्रार्थना अच्छी लगती है। शर्त यही है कि वह उस इतिहास से मुँह न मोड़े, जिसने शांति को सबसे पहले चोट पहुँचाई थी।

@duttsanjay

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

संजय दत्त का शेखर सुमन के शो वाला बयान अपने आप में दिलचस्प है। देश में शांति न होने की शिकायत, पुराने दिनों की याद, और फिर मुन्ना भाई बनकर पाँच मिनट का प्रधानमंत्री भाषण सब एक ही मंच पर।

शांति की बात कोई भी कर सकता है। लेकिन जब बोलने वाला वही व्यक्ति हो, जिसे 1993 के मुंबई बम धमाकों से जुड़े मामले में अवैध AK-56 और गोला-बारूद रखने का दोषी ठहराया गया था, तब शब्द अपने वजन से हल्के पड़ जाते हैं। साजिश के आरोप में बरी होना और हथियार रखने की सजा काटना दोनों बातें रिकॉर्ड पर हैं। उस दौर में शहर में शांति नहीं टूटी थी, उसे तोड़ा गया था।

आज वही व्यक्ति गांधी जयंती के मौके पर गांधीगिरी का पाठ पढ़ा रहे हैं, विदेश यात्राओं और पोस्टरों पर व्यंग्य कर रहे हैं। अभिव्यक्ति का अधिकार है, और कलाकार को व्यंग्य करने की छूट भी। पर नैतिक अधिकार और कानूनी रिकॉर्ड एक जैसे नहीं होते। जिस हाथ ने कभी अवैध हथियार सँभाला था, वही हाथ जब देश को शांति का उपदेश दे, तो श्रोता को सिर्फ भाषण नहीं, पूरा इतिहास भी याद रखना चाहिए।

शांति की प्रार्थना अच्छी लगती है। शर्त यही है कि वह उस इतिहास से मुँह न मोड़े, जिसने शांति को सबसे पहले चोट पहुँचाई थी।

@duttsanjay

[TheSaffronWave @TheSaffronWave_]

India is no longer only advocating peace in the Russia-Ukraine war. It is now part of the diplomatic process.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister @andrii_sybiha has said Kyiv has four ceasefire proposals from India, Türkiye, Egypt and the United States and that India’s is the broadest. Ukraine is prepared to consider an energy and Black Sea truce together, covering strikes on energy facilities, port infrastructure and the Black Sea.

President Vladimir Putin has separately said Prime Minister @narendramodi ji raises the need to end the conflict at every meeting and has “VERY GOOD IDEAS” for a mutually acceptable solution.

External Affairs Minister @DrSJaishankar ji. has confirmed that in recent months India has moved beyond advocacy, holding talks with both Moscow and Kyiv on Black Sea shipping safety, grain and energy exports, and possible non-attack arrangements.

New Delhi’s position remains consistent: dialogue over alignment, and an end to war over an endless war. When both sides treat the same proposal as serious, that role is no longer symbolic.

Choosing the side of peace is also a strategic choice.

#India #Ukraine #Russia #Diplomacy