Making programming more accessible, one line at a time ๐ผ Claude Code at Anthropic ๐ผ Passionate about diversity ๐ผ Views are my own ๐ผ she/her
Yeah I guess the interpretation of that comes down to how much heavy lifting you're willing to let "severe" and "debilitating" do here. Obviously there are versions of this that are awful, and of course it depends on what you think an embryo is with respect to personhood. Question: do you currently feel the same way about the reduction in trisomy 21 through embrionic screening? If so, I would agree that this is disturbing. I would hope most things this is referring to are more severe than that, but it's a really good call out that I could be giving people more benefit of the doubt than I should.
100% agree with this, and I own a lot of Anthropic stock. I'd trade all of it in a heartbeat to change the world this profoundly, and I think there's a chance we actually do it.
I don't really care about the stock price but if @AnthropicAI can accelerate cures of all these terrible diseases it'll be one of the most impactful companies in history.
I'm actually really glad Dario is focused on this vs. winning on viral shorts and TikTok memes.
@anaisbetts I sincerely hope this isn't true, and nothing I've read would suggest that. But if you've seen this in Anthropic's writing (either internally when you were there or externally), please point it out so I can make noise internally and be a part of trying to change this.
That's very true, and I really appreciate you calling me out on that. Please keep doing soโI believe society is better with people like you calling bullshit on things like this. The pressure to prove you wrong is a feeling I want to hold on to. A better way to say this would have been to say that I want to be the kind of person who would do this in a hypothetical situation that will never really exist, and it's really important to have people like you who continue to pressure me to want that. Thank you!
@mathburritos That's a fair criticism, and I hope that people like you will continue to keep me honest about these things. I intend to give away a large fraction of the wealth that I get from Anthropic and keep living the same way I currently am, but I need people to keep me honest on that.
Whiteboards are suuuuuch a level up for coding use cases. You should be getting Claude to do things for you at a level of abstraction that requires a whiteboard to think through. Now you have the tool to do it, built right into Claude Code. I've been waiting for this for a while!
We just added Whiteboards and Sheets to Claude, and Dashboards is now Claude Data.
Work with your team and Claude to:
โข Sketch a plan and brainstorm live
โข Ask for a formula in plain words
โข Turn the numbers into a story
Sketch, sum, show it in Claude
@realJavierSilva It's got a big model smell for sure. It's opinionated, and you should mostly use it for situations where you need it to be opinionated. If you know what you want precisely, it's not worth the cost typically. (With the exception of visuals and 3D.)
I'm so excited that I finally get to talk about our new model with you all publicly! Let us know what you think, and show us all of the cool things you're building!
Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2, designed to tackle the most daunting technical challenges.
Theyโre capable collaborators on ambitious projects in many fields, and show improvements in areas like coding, reasoning, and vision.
This is actually INSANE.
Fable 5.2 just created this in one shot, and I did it live on stream.
I gave Claude one prompt.
It wrote code that builds the entire room in Blender: the desk, the MacBook, the light, even Clawd.
The laptop screen is a web page Claude built to look like the Claude app, played on the laptop inside the 3D scene.
Then it animated everything itself: 13 camera shots, every single key press, Clawd jumping around, and the sun going from golden hour to night to sunrise.
It rented 10 GPUs on RunPod and rendered the whole thing in 4K in 52 minutes. Total cost: $5.75.
It graded it, added the titles, and made the music and sound effects with ElevenLabs.
(More info below)
@_lunaynx@rborkows@theo You don't need anything that fancy. Just have one session running Fable and one running Opus and tell them to talk to each other. Explain that you want Opus writing the code and running the commands. They'll figure it out from there.
My advice: Use Opus 5.5 for more specific tasks where you're already pretty sure you know what you want, and use Fable 5.2 for more creative tasks when you're not entirely sure what you want.
@theo Yeah that makes sense. I actually think Opus is fine at helping you figure out what you want also. It's a lot more about when you have a sense that you don't know enough to know whether you have a full idea of the final picture. This is when you really see the big models excel.
@komran21 I mostly use them for non-coding tasks. Haiku is really good for "system 1" tasks like "did the user say anything about walruses?" Think about it as a really, really robust grep or something like that. I mostly use Sonnet for conversations and casual "chatbot-like" use cases.
Just want to echo how grateful we are for of our users. I had never worked on a product before in my career before I started on Claude Code almost two years ago, and it immediately hit me what a privilege it is to have enthusiastic users. Excited to keep building for you all!
We wanted to do more for the people whoโve been with us the longest. So with Fable 5.2, the longer youโve been subscribed, the more Fable resets you get.