Dear reporters:
When taking comments from antigun orgs and personalities, you should really ask them the following two questions:
1. You predicted widespread crime and violence increases after Bruen. Four years later, homicide is at record lows despite millions more exercising the right to carry. Why were you wrong, and why should we take your predictions seriously this time?
2. You likewise predict Wolford will lead to crime and violence, even though no such law has ever been in effect anywhere. What evidence do you have that people with CCW permits commit lots of crime? Didn't Hawaii and California both concede this argument when faced with statistical evidence in the district courts?
Also, feel free to reach out to me if you need their nonsense rebutted.
@GavinNewsom When we presented statistical evidence in May v. Bonta that those with CCW permits almost never commit crime, your DOJ didn't even argue that point. They conceded it.
The Supreme Court slapped down a Hawaiian law that infringed on the Second Amendment. Justice Jackson, in her dissent, started quoting Hawaiian law from when it was a separate Kingdom. LOL
"Since its time as a sovereign kingdom, Hawaii has never permitted the widespread carrying of firearms in its territory. In 1833, King Kamehameha III of the Kingdom of Hawaii prohibited the possession of “dangerous weapon[s].”
Antifa seems really confused that a judge would think a bunch of them getting together one night to attack a police station and shooting a cop could be interpreted as an act of organized terrorism instead of like 7 or 8 smol bean transgirls who are just like, so random