@DerekCarty any reason why Miguel Vargas is proj for about 3-6 more hr on the batx vs all the others? The bat has 17, batx 22. I know batx is more accurate, but a difference of 5 seems high?
@BalesBets@ShipMyMoneyDFS If there wasn't a defender to rip the ball loose, the ball wouldn't have come loose, easily ruled catch. In this scenario since there is a defender here, down by contact, then ball ripped out. Easily a catch again
@ShipMyMoneyDFS@MackersMack 1.5x*. Then that pool gets redistributed to teams that are under the luxury tax. This would allow a floor to be set that teams wouldn't oppose since they will be receiving more $. I wouldn't hard cap it though so it doesn't hurt players salary. Also get rid of deferred contracts
@ShipMyMoneyDFS@MackersMack Ah ok well basically how I would do it if I were Manfred is set the luxury tax line at we will say 100m for this example. Any team over 100m has to contribute 1.25x towards the revenue sharing pool (so 112 mil would have to contribute 115 mil), anyone over 150 mil contribute 1.5m
@ShipMyMoneyDFS@MackersMack Agreed, don't you think a model similar to the NBA would work? Without the player caps/hard caps, but implement different luxury tax levels that get redistributed to low revenue teams and then require them to hit a salary floor.
@ShipMyMoneyDFS@MackersMack I agree all teams should spend more, however I'm also confident all teams would spend more if they only had to share 1/3 of their tv contract
@StokasticHOF great start to the NBA season! Does this count as top 3 since it's the 3rd best unique lineup?
@DK__DFS@JoshEngleman thanks for the Mitchell discussion, I forced him in 5x field. Reaves scoring 10 to Draymond's 0 in the last 4 min cost me 2nd