Bradley

Combat Vet 🇺🇸 | Christ is King
Gators | Braves | Cowboys | Lightning

[Bradley @thrones_jo]

Don’t let them lie to you!!!!!

The New Testament teaches the rejection of ethnic Israel as God’s chosen people due to their rejection of Jesus. The kingdom of God has been taken away from them and given to the Church (believers in Christ), which includes Jews and Gentiles as the “true Jews” or “seed of Abraham.”

• Matthew 21:33–44 (Parable of the Vineyard): Israel as tenants who kill the son (Jesus); the kingdom is taken from them and given to others who produce fruit (the Church).
• Matthew 8:10–13: Gentiles (like the centurion) enter the kingdom, while “subjects of the kingdom” (Jews rejecting Jesus) are cast into darkness.
• Matthew 23:32–39 & Matthew 24: Judgment on Jerusalem for killing prophets and rejecting Jesus; the temple’s destruction (70 AD) as a sign God is “done” with them.
• Romans 2:26–29: A true Jew is one inwardly, with circumcision of the heart by the Spirit (i.e., faith in Christ), not physical descent.
• Galatians 3:15–29: Abraham’s “seed” is Christ; believers (Jews and Gentiles) baptized into Christ become Abraham’s heirs.
• Galatians 4:21–31 (Allegory of Hagar and Sarah): Earthly Jerusalem = Hagar (bondage, Ishmael’s descendants); Heavenly Jerusalem = Sarah (freedom, true promise through Isaac/Christ). Jews rejecting Jesus are spiritually “Ishmaelites,” not Sarah’s children.
• Revelation 2:8–9 & 3:7–9: Jesus calls some claiming to be Jews “liars” and part of the “synagogue of Satan”; they’ll bow before the Church, acknowledging God’s love for it.
• Ties into John 8:44 (Jews rejecting Jesus have the devil as father) and 1 John 3:12 (Cain as Satan’s son, linking to “brood of vipers” in Matthew 23).

[Bradley @thrones_jo]

@TyroneS42704917 271k!!! Mostly from famine and disease

[Bradley @thrones_jo]

I’m denying it. Victors write the history

[Tyrone Shoelaces 🍉 @TyroneS42704917]

No one is denying the holocaust. 27m people died. 6m of which were Jews. Never again however means never again and that includes the genocide in Gaza.

[Bradley @thrones_jo]

@pablobronte72 @LKeson74962 @MannsterRick @alyssamariiee11 Tbf they have one. It’s just severely smaller and less developed then all of humanity and some animals

[Bradley @thrones_jo]

@8MindEater8 @MannsterRick @mariaba692 @alyssamariiee11 49 followers is crazy. Shut your smooth Brain ass up J-Kwon

[Bradley @thrones_jo]

@Gabrielqui88217 Low iq, smooth brain LaQuisha, wtf does this have to do with Kirk. Lol all white ppl are the same? 🤣

[Bradley @thrones_jo]

@Tomhennessey69 @nypost She only gets the money if she doesn’t bend a knee and give one of those slop apologies. Never apologize for pattern recognition and calling a spade a spade

[Tom Hennessey @Tomhennessey69]

A degenerate mystery meat lesbian is FURIOUS at Tom Hennessey and vows to send strongly worded emails to GiveSendGo. Thankfully, she's a genetic dead end.

The world is grateful!

[Scott Horton @scotthortonshow]

Lead buried below a big pile of straw men.

[👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™ @ScottEnlow]

If they can turn legal photography into an ID demand, the threat of handcuffs and a detention, what else can they turn into one?

👮‍♂️ANYTHING THEY WANT!

Houston, TX (near the Harris County courthouse)

A News Now Houston auditor had just walked out of the court building and was filming Precinct 1 Constable vehicles + county facilities in public for a “blue privilege” video (multiple cameras, camo shirt).

Deputy Bart (Pct 1) rolled up, called it “suspicious,” and demanded ID.

He claimed reasonable suspicion that the auditor might be documenting movements to attack the building or officers.

Repeatedly threatened handcuffs and detention if the auditor wouldn’t hand over ID.

Auditor: “I’m documenting public officials on public property. Have I broken a law?”

Deputy: “I can detain you.”

Auditor refused until actually detained, citing Texas law (ID only required after lawful arrest).

Deputy detained him, did a Terry frisk, and continued pressing.

Female Sgt. Christine B. Barrientez (Pct 1) arrived.

She directed an information-only report to intelligence — no arrest.

ID was photographed and run (clear).

Stop ended.

Aftermath:

Sgt. Berrientez filed a YouTube privacy complaint trying to get the video removed.

She was unsuccessful.

News Now Houston called it an attempt to censor a public servant performing duties in public and posted the phone number for Constable Alan Rosen.

❓Auditor cited Texas law — ID only required after lawful arrest. - Sgt. Barrientez arrives and still logs his identification to intelligence division where it will entered into a database. Does rank equal better judgment here?

❓Sgt. Berrientez ordered a report to intelligence. - Why put a person taking photos and video into an intelligence database?

❓Once a name is forwarded to "intelligence" for "suspicious photography" is that the end of it, or is that just the beginning of an active investigation to check your background and current activities?

[👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™ @ScottEnlow]

This is the most annoying deputy you’ll ever see, and the video is a prime example of why you should almost always remain silent. Anything you say will be twisted.

On April 4, 2019, First Amendment auditor Rogue Nation filmed inside the Florida Dept. of Health in Osceola County lobby in Kissimmee.

Staff called the Osceola Sheriff Department and Deputy C. Bonar badge #2154 responded.

He wore an F.T.O. pin. (Field Training Officer)

Deputy Bonar accused him of 'loitering' and questioned what business he had on the property.

He then claimed recording someone without their permission is a crime and the man recording could be trespassed for allegedly “causing a nuisance” by making employees uncomfortable with his presence and recording.

The video ends with Bonar going to talk to the complainant. (Which he should have done first.)

No arrest was made.

❓Should an FTO who can’t explain the First Amendment still be training new deputies?

❓Should Deputy Bonar remain a Field Training officer after this video?

[👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™ @ScottEnlow]

👮‍♂️ It's Hilarious When A Police Officer Thinks That Just Because They "Have Been Doing This For 22 Years" That They Must Be Doing It Right!👮‍♂️

On October 31, 2023, and again on November 20, 2023, a First Amendment auditor with the YouTube channel I.A.M. Free – Inland Auditing Media went to the Washington State Department of Corrections Work Release Office in Port Orchard, WA 98367.

He was there to film publicly accessible areas and submit a public records request after tips about issues at the facility.

DOC staff confronted him, claimed the state property was effectively private (comparing it to a library), refused full identification at points, and ordered him to leave, saying he needed permission or a pass.

Port Orchard Police responded. Officer R. Luke (Badge #720) and Sgt. T. Holden (Trey Holden, Badge #716) arrived.

Officers issued a verbal trespass warning, stating that remaining or returning could lead to arrest for criminal trespass under Washington law.

They treated the location as subject to exclusion after warning even though it is state/public property.

The auditor argued the site is public property, that he was in an accessible area without adequate restrictive signage, and that he was engaged in protected activity.

He maintained that arbitrary exclusion for viewpoint or press activity requires proper time/place/manner justification.

The DOC employees called higher ups and realized the mistake they were making then withdrew their trespass warning.

👮‍♂️The police sergeant who had bragged of knowing the law after having been on the job for 22 years was proven to be completely wrong about the law.

Outcome: No arrest.

No public court records or mainstream news reports indicate charges, a formal complaint outcome, or further legal action from this specific incident.

❓Is it appropriate for uncomfortable staff to call police simply because someone is filming and asking for records, with no other disruptive behavior?

❓How often are public areas unrestricted until an employee sees someone walking around filming and then suddenly they're a restricted or secured area?

[👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™ @ScottEnlow]

❓Why do so many police officers act like they’re there to back up the person who called them, instead of calmly checking what’s really going on with an open mind?

Lubbock PD responds to a USPS post office after an auditor films exterior/public areas.

Officer Simons and Officer Aarp arrive.

Aarp issues a criminal trespass warning at postal staff’s request and threatens arrest if the auditor doesn’t leave the property (including the parking lot).

Auditor cites the right to record in publicly accessible areas and leaves under the threat rather than test the arrest.

He requests a supervisor and Sergeant Mora arrives, only to be dismissive and flippant.

No charges were filed.

USPS Poster 7 generally permits news-purpose photography in lobbies, entrances, and public spaces absent actual disruption.

Full video shows the exchange.

❓Should simply existing with a camera at a post office be treated as a criminal disturbance?

❓Can a postal employee decide what is or isn't a disturbance based solely on his or her comfort?

❓Who sets the official rules of the post office? The United States Postal Service or the random uncomfortable employee?

[👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™ @ScottEnlow]

How many people has this officer illegally threatened with arrest for “failure to ID” over a quarter-century?

The apology at the end of the video seems sincere but how could he be so wrong for so long and no one ever corrected him?

Dallas PD officer with 25 years on the job detains a man filming outside the North Central Division on Sept 1, 2015, tells him failure to ID is a crime, and threatens arrest.

Philip Turner refuses, cites Texas Penal Code § 38.02, and stands his ground.

Officers claim “suspicious activity” after he entered a nearby business while filming the station from public space.

After some time off camera the officer returns:

“Here’s where I owe you an apology. You’re right—you don’t have to identify yourself if you weren’t suspected of a crime… it’s not failure to ID unless you committed a crime.”

Turner asks how long he’s been an officer.

Officer: “25 years.”

Officer: “I wish I walked on water. I’m not perfect.”

Turner: “Hey, that’s 101 right there.”

Released. No arrest.

It’s rare to see an officer publicly correct himself on the spot. But after 25 years, how does basic Texas ID law still need an on-the-spot education?

❓How many other 20+ year veterans are still operating on incorrect understandings of ID law?

❓What does it say about training when a 25-year veteran has to be corrected on the law by someone he's threatening to arrest?

[👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™ @ScottEnlow]

Do you blame the one who threw a 🖕in response to a friendly wave👋 or the one who turned around and went back?

In May 2019 in Carey, Ohio, Officer Joshua Snyder of the Carey Police Department waved at Kieran Smith while Smith was walking on a public sidewalk with his wife and young child.

Smith responded with a middle finger.

Snyder then stopped the family, threatened to arrest Smith for disorderly conduct, detained and handcuffed him in front of his wife and child, and ultimately issued a citation.

Bodycam and related footage later showed Snyder giving a supervisor an inaccurate account of the encounter, including claims about Smith refusing to identify himself that did not match what occurred.

Smith later filed a federal lawsuit against the Village of Carey. The case settled for roughly $40,000–$46,000.

❓Was what you saw on the video the same as what Officer Snyder told the police chief?

❓When a bodycam records one version of events and the officer's memory records another version, which one should be believed?

❓Is the only real difference here that Smith chose to be an a**hole instead of waving back like a normal person?

[Chaos TV @ChaosTV]

Man gets Pepper Sprayed and charged with multiple crimes for attacking

[DeletelawZ @DeletelawZ]

His Ex-Pig-Uncle is an accused PDF File. I didn't do that, I just exposed it. I'm not going down to his level. Now, if he had touched me, I would have done what had to be did. #Ironton, Ohio. We Don't Stop!

[DeletelawZ @DeletelawZ]

FILED. DeCastro v. LVMPD, Case No. 2:26-cv-00373 (D. Nev.) Feb. 14, 2024: arrested for filming police. The charge? DISMISSED. Now LVMPD, Clark County & Ofc. Frumpkin answer in federal court. Filming cops is a right, not a crime. #1A #4A

[👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™ @ScottEnlow]

Should police be able to demand your ID just because a neighbor sees you parked taking pictures from a public street?

North Branch, MN — May 2022: Man sits in his parked car on the public street at 6186 Oak Street.

A neighbor calls police, claiming he’s taking pictures of her while she’s in her yard.

Officer David Janssen (Badge 518, North Branch PD; later promoted to Sergeant) arrives and immediately demands the man’s driver’s license and proof of insurance.

He says the call is about photographing the neighbor in her yard and that the activity “can be considered intrusive and disorderly conduct.”

He detains the man for investigation into “suspicious activity.”

The man is on public property. He states he committed no crime, that photography from a public vantage point is protected by the First Amendment, and that he is not required to produce ID without reasonable articulable suspicion of a specific crime.

He repeatedly asks if he is being detained and for what crime, films the entire encounter, and eventually gets the officer’s name and badge on camera.

The stop lasts roughly 13 minutes.

No crime is identified.

Janssen ends the detention and leaves.

No citation, no arrest, no forced ID.

❓Does knowing your rights actually change the outcome in these encounters?

❓If the man had handed over his ID immediately, would the stop have ended faster or gone further?

[@FightStorage @FightStorage]

Lunatic Karen Ends Up Pepper Sprayed by Auditor