Timbo

A husband, father, engineer, driver, cyclist, walker and occasional sailor. Views are my own based upon experience and life.

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@langoo @CitizenUddin Correct, he may have stopped once before deciding to filter past, however still not cycle lane across the junction. So my point remains, why point out the car and not the cyclist

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@ediz1975 Good to see the cyclist did bother checking it was clear to change lanes or signal the manoeuvre, much better to complain about officers looking after someone in distress

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@Gosleepriya 95

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@algurahmet47 B

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@snevinoj @BobFromAccounts Unfortunately many cyclists need training and the quality of cycling is falling. Yes, many drivers are also below ideal however many more also need to compensate for the falling standards of cyclists.
Possibly too many cyclists believe they can do anything & others will adapt

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@snevinoj @BobFromAccounts Because too many show a lack of understanding of the HC and failure to exhibit basic skills & observation required to safely share a road with other road users. Possibly if there was better education for cyclists it would reduce casualty figures

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@Dilekk344 21

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@IsSaddleThereIs @ChrisandVictory Let’s remember that the pedestrian has the priority

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@ChrisandVictory @IsSaddleThereIs If dismounted and walking then no problem with using the pavement, in fact it’s preferable to walking on the road.

That said, why is the van parked there? Totally stupid

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@IsSaddleThereIs No

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@onlyskypace 48

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@SaferRoadsYorks Clearly good road surface without potholes, etc, busy road so you know traffic will be passing so no surprises, cycling well so no indication that you/he would veer right.
Yes I can see why there would be no further action as it’s only a suggested distance not mandatory

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@2Bigg4 @LostSoulEscapee @LozzaFox Agreed, no expectation of privacy but it’s good policing to challenge anyone who is acting suspiciously. The PC did a good job and the guys actions/response could suggest he had other motives.
Good policing, I can see why you struggled

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@SaferRoadsYorks @TracyBrabin @DeputyMayorPCWY Remember that the 1.5m is a guidance and not mandatory. It looks like W.Yorks assessed the pass to be safe, you may disagree.

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@2Bigg4 @LostSoulEscapee @LozzaFox Or it’s simply Officers doing a good job trying to keep the general public safe. Unfortunately some like to think they know better and wish to chase vid clips so play up for a posting.
Good policing, need more of this

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@2Bigg4 @LostSoulEscapee @LozzaFox Unless suspected of an offence. The actions of the individual (let’s remember we only have the view from the camera) may well have increased suspicion.
Good policing

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@iqrafatma1278 When did the expected tip rate become 40%
We pay a service charge, therefore we have already paid for service. An additional tip is applicable if the service is above minimum.

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@LondonTrafficW1 Part of the problem is you encourage more cycling by making it easier & alternatives harder, yet fail to introduce controls that keep up to date with modern society.
Licensing and updating of cycling laws required to enforce rules and keep safe for all, not just cyclists

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@joedamaggio @SaferRoadsYorks That is correct, you are wrong in saying that it’s not my decision to make. I can make that assessment based upon my observations, my experience and comparison to others. Based upon those I am able to say his clipping in was very inefficient and was dangerous

[Timbo @timbo_61]

@DearGozde There is a hidden multiplayer increasing by 1 each time

1+(4x1)=5
2+(5x2)=12
3+(6x3)=21
4+(11x4)=48

So the first number is both a multiplier and addition to the second number