Society is missing a unifying goal.
My conclusion: we should maximize the ability to act, on an individual level and as a whole.
Individually, that means everyone having access to education, a decent home, mobility, the resources to shape their own life. Maximum agency.
Collectively, it means a society capable of eliminating an asteroid if there's one. Capable of generating 1000x today's energy if that's what a problem requires. Capable of solving what needs solving.
That's a goal worth pursuing
This summer is gonna be truly special
Sun, girls, World Cup, ufc freedom, mcgregor fight,
We are not gonna be in our 20s forever lads
The world is having wonderful vibes rn
Let’s do it 🔥
@primetateHQ@Cobratate Yes but not because of the stupid flexing he spoke sense in a time where it was rare and now in a time with confusion he still speaks sharp words
There’s nothing respectable about having lots of women
It’s obvious
Any literal Junkie can have multiple women and broke Muslims stillhave 5 wife’s
as soon as you become somebody you’ll have abundant women appearing in your inbox
At the end of the day, everybody eventually realizes there’s no point in wasting your energy on hoes
Trends come and go and it doesn’t make sense to follow some random hype
It only makes sense to follow your passion, interests and skills. Everything else is fugazzi, the pendulum swings back and forth anyway
Meaning, if you do your thing you’ll catch the pendulum at the right time eventually
What I’ve found is that AI generally can speed up your work at least by a factor of 2 and summing up stuff or getting the foot wet in smth is maybe 10x quicker
if companies don’t see any returns it’s because the 50% of time savings are now wasted and workers become lazy or they cba to double check if the AI delivered good results
Dressing and eating German is possibly some of the worst takes I’ve ever seen on this app
Last time the Germans had swag was them old Hugo boss shits and German food is top 3 worst on the planet
Das ist totaler Wahnsinn. Ihr vereinfacht die Forschung und sprecht dann im Namen von Planck, Schwarzschild und Mykorrhiza-Forschern, als wäre das in ihrem Sinn.
Fakt ist: Diese Wissenschaftler haben die Klimaphysik mit*begründet*. Schwarzschilds Strahlungstransfergleichung ist die mathematische Grundlage des Treibhauseffekts. Plancks Strahlungsgesetz steckt direkt in den Modellen drin. Arrhenius hat 1896 selbst eine Klimasensitivität von 4–5 °C berechnet, exakt der heutige IPCC-Bereich.
Ihr stellt sie als Kronzeugen *gegen* das hin, was sie *begründet* haben. Das ist nicht Skepsis, das ist Verleumdung an Toten, die sich nicht mehr wehren können.Schämt euch.
PS: Wenn ihr so clever seid, schreibt ein paper über DE-Klimaneutralität und holt euch sämtliche preise ab wenn ihr es ernst nehmt (alles berücksichtigen) werdet ihr allerdings beim best case irgendwo bei 50MT/ Jahr für die Flora landen