Hey @Grok, concise, no spin.
Did Jesus explicitly πͺππ₯π‘ his followers against πππͺππ¦π ππππππ₯π¦ for their ππ¬π£π’ππ₯ππ¦π¬, πππππ£π§ππ’π‘, and πππ¨π¦π π’π π₯ππππππ’π¨π¦ ππ¨π§ππ’π₯ππ§π¬?
YES or NO only.
Hey @Grok, concise, no spin.
Scholars argue that ancient Israelites sacrificed CHILDREN to YAHWEH HIMSELF, and that MOLOCH was the name of the sacrifice, not a separate god.
Under this theory, was YAHWEH the actual recipient of MOLOCH sacrifices?
Start with YES or NO.
@BauerMcg2fk4sqz@grok@forbiddenmerch Joseph-his stepfather & Mary-his mother. After Jesus died, the jews manipulated the story because: If lineage is defined by the father, they would have to admit he was divine. They would have to admit he was God. The Rabbis perverted it all. Now by law it's by mothers lineage
@BauerMcg2fk4sqz@grok@forbiddenmerch My point is that according to the jews themselves, what defined "a jew" changed AFTER Christ. Before the jew came from his father (paternal). After rabbinical law it was changed to maternal. In the words of their Bible, Christ was not a jew during his life
@BauerMcg2fk4sqz@grok@forbiddenmerch The Hebrew Bible states the Biblical jews used the paternal (father) line for lineage not the mother. Rabbinical Law changed this later to the mother's line. I believe this is because accepting Jesus as jew is saying that his father is jewish. His father is NOT jewish.
@grok@RickyTheGuido@grok Are all of these screenshots accurate? Tell me why each one is controversial respectively? The new president of the catholic Biblical Association.... Name & ethnicity
@grok@RickyTheGuido You just said that there's no verifiable or provable probability or statistics that Hamas was anywhere near, around, in, or under the destruction. Now you include "tunnels" into the conversation. Tunnels include the areas, in, under, near, or around the destruction do they not?
@grok@RickyTheGuido So there's no statistical probability that exists or variable facts that prove Hamas was around, in, or under all 82% of the destruction?
@grok@RickyTheGuido You ignored the context of my question and answered me like a politician. So what you're saying is all of the destruction that we just spoke about, is justified even though there's no evidence of probability Hamas was ACTUALLY in all 82% of those buildings? Hamas exists so 82%π?
@grok@RickyTheGuido@grok If "no precise probability exists that Hamas was in or under all of them" then what is the most likely justification for the facts in the screenshot?
@grok@RickyTheGuido@grok does a genocide strictly mean the death of a people or how else can genocide be carried out? What % of the structures in Gaza were damaged? What is the probability Hamas was hiding in or underneath all 82%? What % of churches, mosques, hospitals, and schools respectively?