Tim Howard

Helping you think better as a Christian. Co-Host of the Inspiring Philosophy Academy YouTube Channel. Coach for Inspiring Philosophy Academy courses.

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

If your refutation of someone’s worldview starts and ends with logical incoherence, that is not a flex, but a glaring weakness in your epistemology.

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

Come on now 😂

Let’s be precise: ‘God’ here refers to the quality of divinity.

Divinity *qua* divinity lacks proper parts *essentially*.

The Son insofar His divinity lacks proper parts essentially.

It’s very simple: The Son just acquires a human body.

That’s it.

[Thoughtful-Faith @ThoughtfulSaint]

P1- A body has parts

P2- God has no parts

P3- The person Jesus has a body

Therefore the person Jesus is not God.

Are you sure you want to go with P2?

[InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones @InspiringPhilos]

Science would not be what it is without Christianity. This is not even up for debate among experts.

[InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones @InspiringPhilos]

New Video! - The Two Powers in Heaven - The Jewish Roots of the Trinity

In this video Than digs deep into the very early evidence of the Trinity in the Old Testament.

Get EARLY ACCESS 🔓 - https://t.co/r1wzIerxAh

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

The only people who think Mike ran are those who were already doing tricks on it 😂😂😭

[Deen @Deenresponds]

New Video where IP refuses to speak to me on Hijabs platform and Ran

https://t.co/cv2Kdm13rb

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

@WriterJohnBuck Exactly this.

This is where they are implicitly butchering trivial modal metaphysics when shouting “that makes the Son contingent!”

Modally speaking, there are no possible worlds where the Son does not exist. This what anyone means by *not contingent*.

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

Very simple question: according to Orthodox Trinitarian beliefs — does the Son exist in every possible world?

Yes or no?

[Thoughtful-Faith @ThoughtfulSaint]

I hate seeing Muslims own Christians but the reality is that THE PERSON you call the son is not self existent if you say he is being GENERATED BY ANOTHER PERSON.

Saying yeah but his nature/essence (aka divinity) is eternal just ignores the issue. The question is not if divinity is contingent, the question if THE PERSON CALLED THE SON is contingent.

I would love to go on @InspiringPhilos with Blake Ostler and explain the problem.

This is the problem with the creedal tradition. Its theology is incoherent and it can’t stand up to Islam.

But LDS don’t have that problem.

Reject the Trinity

Embrace the Godhead

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

Must. Need.

[Than Christopoulos - Inspiring Philosophy @ExploringReali2]

I love you Jacob. But maybe it’s time we have a discussion on this and tussle a bit. Dinner on me after?

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

@Edenlife9 Hey brother, I’m the creator of this video. Thank you for sharing it 🙏🏽

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

Oh look, there’s me 😂

This one seems to have shook him up a bit.

I think onlookers can make their mind up on this one just fine.

[The Orthodox Muslim @muslimorthodoxy]

Braindead Christian apologists bury themselves in trying to tackle the consensus.

This quote from the First Apology is NOT a quote of John’s Gospel, that is not how the verse reads, a parellel concept also found in the gospel is NOT a quote.

If this is ALL that you can find to overlap with Johnanine material, then you are proving my point further than Justin Martyr, the huge logos theorist NEVER quotes Johns gospel to support his Logos christology. This is the biggest evidence he wasn’t aware of it!

Also notice how they don’t respond to what I say after in the clip ? Namely that Justin declares Paul a disbeliever ? lol

Even with lies, Christianity still dies.

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

@GodLogic_GL Faaaactsss

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

Last night on I went live on TikTok and a Muslim dropped the latest Dawah that shook everyone’s faith:

“Muhammad was handsome and Jesus was ugly”

🤯🤯

[InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones @InspiringPhilos]

What it’s like to read Dan McClellan

[Jon Steel @bigjonsteel]

If want to get really good at Islamic apologetics just get super cocky, arrogant and cheer for yourself no matter what happens and they will love you

[Jon Steel @bigjonsteel]

Tell me I’m wrong

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

@ExploringReali2 We call it chimpmaxxing

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

@analyticityy @ExploringReali2 Great, so then you would agree that kinds play a role of multiply instantiating complete individuals, no?

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

This is not a true dichotomy.

This assumes that one cannot predicate <is God> to the Father and <is God> to the Son via reduplicative predication where both the Father and the Son are incomplete individuals.

Why should we believe that? So far, no argument has been given.

[Abdul Rahman (TAP) @abdul_now]

Well, you don’t have many options. Either divinity is multiply-instantiable, or it isn’t. If it is, then three instantiations = three gods. If it isn’t, then what exactly is identical to the “one God”? If both the father and son are identical to it, then father = son. If only one of them is identical to it, then the other isn’t God. And if neither is identical to it, you’re forced to retreat to partialism or modalism. Or just say the obvious and admit your theology is incoherent.

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

@analyticityy @ExploringReali2 You know exactly what I’m asking, which means it should be easy for you to straightforwardly answer my clarification question: is the predicate <is human> as it relates to <humanity> predicating a kind or no?

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

@analyticityy @ExploringReali2 Nice try. Either <is human> is predicating a ‘kind’ or something else. I’m interested in qualifying what it is exactly we are predicating. Are you unwilling to engage with that or no?

[Tim Howard @timscotthoward]

@analyticityy @ExploringReali2 Let’s start with the first point. For clarification: is <is human> predicating a universal or something else on your view?