@naa_ganesan@ShauryaCGhoshal https://t.co/rz7N51YRg2
"it will be good if "world" arcaheologists do tests and tell its date."
what is "world" ?
"test" - is that not lab test ?
Actually that particular ambiguity did exist among scholars regarding its authenticity, but have now been resolved after the artefact had undergone laboratory texts and showed metallurgical similarities with other anthropomorphic figurines of the Copper Hoard Culture.
Lmao such dumb person speaking
Oldest rigvedic mandala 6 - mentions eastern rivers like Ganga and also eastern flora and fauna.
The Rigvedic Aryans lived in the saraswati region in india, later to indus.
There is no rigvedic elements proving saraswati to be in afganistan
Yeah now go on tying a jata on your head like the statue instead of the white cap. And please instead of vomiting Gangu, adivasi etc like you had done before please try to throw a better argument this time.
"Mana" the unit to measure gold in the Rigveda is derived as a loanword from the Mesopotamian word "Mina". This shows that exchange of words was mutual.
Interestingly, their vocabulary consists of late Rigvedic and also post Vedic words, as you can see below. This hints towards an undisputable influence from India.
@furqanism Lmao! Citation is required madrasachap! Just mentioned report report yet didn't even bother citing the actual name of the scholar. I assure you I can show you reports of at least 10 scholars. See how BB Lal debunked GA Possehl regarding the cooking hearth claim. Courtesy BB Lal.
Nope. Very much wrong.
Sinthasta Andronovo were not Proto Indo Iranians.
And Rigveda is NOT 1500-1200bce.
This chronological course is going to be trash as seen from the first post.
Archaeological evidence for AMT - None
Mittanis show a later Rigvedic vocabulary.
Vedic people were neither from the Steppes nor does Rigveda date back to 1500 BCE.Don't distort our history by preaching falsehood. Archaeology? Comparative linguistics? Don't joke! Don't impose your nonsensical biblical narrative and what Max Muller concluded in the 19th century
@Jijith_NR@bheemmz https://t.co/GncbzfAxqM
@Jijith_NR your opinion
paper mention
"Eastward avulsion of the palaeo-Yamuna constrained at ∼18 ka, predating the decline of the Harappan Civilization."
https://t.co/gzOmpy6psd
Modi Ji scholar ? - no
Modi ji appealed to a scholar for info - we dont know
Bayesian models = appeal to authority ??
No Obv cuz they are proper studies done.
IVC matches with Rigveda = Yess
@Autonomous78916@HarashaKrish@SR1_aryan@PurvBuddhaMaha@Indic_Arya_LM PGW BAHAJ seals have literally been deciphered.
"PGW only dates to 600 BCE according to the ASI"? Which ASI report says that? many pgw sites + 1200 bce
Mauryan era = 600–500 BCE? 😂 A new history has been discovered. Does this guy have any idea what he's talking about?
n
No Inscritpons and script of IVC.
The script mittanis used.
See others on the images below
Now you can cope more if you want to - although I would not suggest that.
But I recommend you accept the truth
@HarashaKrish@PurvBuddhaMaha Ok.
Ghaggar hakra river eis saraswati - evidnece nadi stuti of Rigveda and other corroboratory verses.
Settlements on sarswati - get basic knowledge form google of kalibangan and such sites. Oldest IVC sites on sarswati - bhirrana.
Mittanis = showing later RigVedic vocab