معلومة وليست رأي | نعم، السعوديون يعانون من القلق ويتجرعون الألم وينشدون السلامة، يعانون ألمًا شديدًا ليس من أصوات التصدي ولا من الاستهدافات والتهديدات الفارغة، إنما أكثر ما يؤلمهم هو حميتهم وغيرتهم على بلادهم - حقيقة وليس ادعاء - فكل إنذار مبكر يسمعونه، يضعهم تحت ضغط تلك الحمية والنزعة الوطنية، فكأنما واجب على كل شخص فيهم أن يقدم روحه وماله للتخلص من حمل هذا الواجب المغروس على أكتافه تجاه دينه وقادته ووطنه ومجتمعه.
قلقون على أمنهم، لكنهم أكثر قلقًا من عودة الوساطات الإقليمية والتفاهمات الدولية، التي من شأنها أن تعيد المنطقة لذات الدوامة، فهم ينشدون سلامة الأجيال من بعدهم، بكسر تلك الدوامة وسحقها تمامًا دون توقف، حتى لو كان ذلك على حساب راحتهم وسلامتهم.
- من يرددون أن السعودية تتجرع الألم وتواجه أيامًا مقلقة، هذا هو الألم الذي تتجرعه وهذا هو القلق الذي تعاني منه، ولا شيئًا سواه.
@2020Aliahsan المملكة العربية السعودية ارض الحرمين الشريفين
-
خادم الحرمين الشريفين الملك سلمان بن عبدالعزيز
-
الحرم المكي والحرم المدني تحت سيادة سعودية يلا ابكي 2
@gyat4ever@AROIGNWEROTING@DOJNatSec Disgusting! you can’t put together a sentence without 💩
Man! you only use paper to clean yourself. Eww! No wonder you’re full of shiit
I’ve been looking into @OpenAI’s history with former employees, and some of these cases deserve a lot more attention.
Here’s what happened:
Leopold Aschenbrenner (@leopoldasch), 2024: Raised concerns about internal security and the protection of sensitive AI research. He says his warnings contributed to his dismissal. OpenAI says he was fired for leaking confidential information.
Pavel Izmailov, 2024: Fired around the same time as Aschenbrenner over alleged information leaks. There’s no established finding that his dismissal was retaliation for raising safety concerns.
Jan Leike, May 2024: Resigned from his AI safety leadership role, saying safety culture and processes had taken a back seat to product development.
Daniel Kokotajlo, April 2024: Resigned after losing confidence in OpenAI’s leadership and criticized the company’s restrictive agreements affecting departing employees.
William Saunders, February 2024: Left OpenAI and later spoke publicly about security weaknesses and concerns over how powerful AI systems were being developed.
Gretchen Krueger, May 2024: Resigned and raised concerns about accountability, transparency, and the company’s approach to AI risks.
Mikita Balesni (@balesni), October 2026: Fired amid disagreements over AI safety. He believes his dismissal was connected to putting safety ahead of commercial priorities.
Tomek Korbak (@tomekkorbak), October 2026: Fired following disputes involving safety concerns and the handling of sensitive information.
Jasmine Wang (@j_asminewang), October 2026: Also dismissed amid the same controversy. The three researchers dispute the company’s account. OpenAI says they violated information-handling policies and denies retaliating against them.
Suchir Balaji, 2024: Resigned in August and later publicly criticized OpenAI’s use of copyrighted material to train AI models. He was found dead in November. Authorities ruled his death a suicide, a conclusion his family disputed. There is no established evidence that OpenAI was responsible for his death.
Abdulrahman Alfozan, October 2026: Arrested following allegations that he installed a covert recording device at OpenAI’s offices. The allegations have not been resolved in court. His case is fundamentally different from the workplace disputes listed above.
These aren’t all the same kind of case, and I’m not claiming they’re connected.
But the repeated public disagreements over security, safety, transparency, and the treatment of employees raise legitimate questions.
How does OpenAI investigate internal complaints? What protections do employees have when they challenge management? And how independently can the company’s decisions be scrutinized?
A company building technology that millions of people are expected to trust should be able to answer those questions.
We discovered a sophisticated recording device that was hidden inside one of our offices. We used our models to understand the device and where it had come from, identifying that a specific employee had planted it a few days earlier. We referred the matter to the FBI, and we’re grateful to the agents and prosecutors who moved quickly to make an arrest. The FBI’s investigation is ongoing and we will continue to support their work.
At this time, we have no indications of this individual inappropriately accessing or exfiltrating model weights, source code, or customer data. The employee was terminated.
We take protecting our technology, data, and people seriously, and as a matter of national importance. Our security program is designed to protect against a wide range of threat actors, from insider risks to cybercriminals to nation states, and this case is an example of how AI can help address these sophisticated security threats.