@lettuce_isgood@TDisputations Math presents the outcome. Again, you either do not understand the philosophy or you're trying to strawman a math issue, (which is not a new tactic fyi). It's one or the other.
@lettuce_isgood@TDisputations No, now you're moving the goal post. There's no argumentation there. You need to read and understand the philosophy before you criticize it. Again, not trying to be a prick. If you might be missing something that's ok. Really. But you have to get what the philosophy is saying.
@lettuce_isgood@TDisputations "Stays". The motion is actual. It does not need an external force to act on it because its power is to do so. This is passive potency (technically).
@lettuce_isgood@TDisputations I think you're on a different track of thinking. Seriously- not trying to be a jerk. Inertia "tends". That's a potency. The thing has for its power motion. Its smuggled in.
@GabrielPer35811@regulator062@cengime@ChildOfStThomas lolz Its a principle rooted in scripture. Changing what is practiced today doesnt invalidate the principle itself. You have on "your side" a governed practice which doesn't get to overrule scripture on what is or isnt the will of the Spirit.
@FrMatthewLC@EricRSammons Thats why the process involves multiple experts and not just the exorcist. If your position is that exorcists just say sensational things, thats different. And a much harder one to defend than the strawman this started with.