Dear Course Creator
You could
- create a marketing strategy
- find your audience
- research your market
- fix your positioning
- create uniqueness
- connect all the tech
- revamp your sales page
- create and run ads
- run ads
- write emails
or hire a marketer
No clicks? positioning. Clicks but no sales? offer. Everyone asking for discounts? targeting. Refunds? the course itself.
People lump all four into "marketing isn't working" and then fix the wrong one. 20 years in and this map hasn't changed.
Writing everything into a checklist attracts people skilled at performing the checklist while filtering out real judgment.
AI agents are the ultimate checklist performers
room full of millionaires brainstorming business problems and the first hand up is a guy terrified he'll be a bad dad.. more honest than anything else on this feed today
Clip: Modern Wisdom, the Darby Saxbe episode.
Your competitor charges more than you and still gets picked. Every time.
Worked with a company that had an 85% pass rate on their cert. Team of 8. Twenty years building the thing. Priced 30% below the main competitor because "better value speaks for itself".. it doesn't.
Competitor had half their track record. Charged more. Won anyway.
The buyer doesn't compare curriculums. They look at the price and the page, and those two things tell a story. If you didn't write that story, the buyer wrote one for you.. and filed you under "budget option".
If there's no tracking I wouldn't even consider it a test.
People tell me they tested ads, tested the price, tested the headline.. I ask what the tracking looked like. There wasn't any. There never is.
Even a dumb spreadsheet counts. Otherwise somebody bought or didn't, and nobody wrote down which.
One reason to build an AI brain
To stop wasting time reading business books and run them against your context
(also 90% are a waste of time)
Codex just saved me 5+ hours
The book's evidence is unreliable:
- It wraps familiar thinking tools in dramatic language and supports them with corporate stories that are false or badly distorted.
- It repeatedly drops precise neuroscience numbers such as 63%, 78%, 76%, and 300%. Those numbers are not tied to identifiable studies in the chapter references.
and gave me 6 lessons that do make sense (10 min read)
Someone built a news site staffed entirely by AI bots and pointed it at the people criticizing AI.
The report ties the money behind it to a super PAC for one of the biggest AI companies.
The case for trusting AI, argued by fake reporters. Lol
I use these tools all day and they're fine.. it's the people getting rich off the story you can't trust.
90% of the business feed is lying to you and everyone kind of knows it.
Faked dashboards, rented lambos, revenue that turns out to be the course about the revenue.. nobody can check any of it, so the loudest liar wins the timeline.
Receipts are the one thing that's hard to fake. Real numbers with the losses still in them.
An account that never shows a loss is an ad.
"We need more traffic."
Heard that more times than I can count over 20 years. Almost every time the funnel was fine.. nobody could tell in three seconds why they'd buy from THIS one over the twelve other tabs open.
More traffic into that buys more people saying no. Fix the "why you" first and the funnel you already have starts doing its job.
- Work only on things you choose.
- One expert, AI, and one or two capable partners.
- A business that lets you disappear for a month.
- No permanent pressure or large team to manage.
- Have a number you want to reach. When done stop.