@TheSUDCoach @WeenDeagle @GhettoGronk If there was room for three more to make him get flat on his back easier, I'd vote for 10! A guy of his size and strength could easily injure or even kill 2 people, could easily insure someone if there were 4 and he got ahold of one. Get a grip on reality man!
@dadstalkinball@akafaceUS No, it is still a pond in Wisconsin. Wisconsin has more than 10,000 lakes. That's true. Minnesota also has closer to 15,000 so they still have more than Wisconsin.
@PlanetTyrus can you please put to bed the rumors of you and whoopi getting into a fight on the view. All the clickbait on FB has people believing this crap.
@briancgray @wyckwax@CamsCards12@GoldinCo I agree....the "paying it forward" comment makes no sense and then when you asked them about it the answer didn't actually answer your question.
@Steve_Grad At what point does the attorney general or someone come out and call out the practice of auto pen signatures, secretarial sigs, etc as fraud and hold someone accountable?
@StillHereBugger@DaytonLibCat @Bate26062668Ron @politvidchannel If you want to have two separate courts both with nine justices, yes you could go over double the cases. But that will never happen. There's only one "COURT".
@StillHereBugger@DaytonLibCat @Bate26062668Ron @politvidchannel You're not getting it. It doesn't matter if you have three justices going over a case, 13 justices going over a case, or 1,000. It takes the same amount of time to go over a case. You can't divide up the work by more people in that way. This isn't production of an item.
@StillHereBugger@DaytonLibCat @Bate26062668Ron @politvidchannel This isn't eating a bie or building a house which you can do faster with more people. No matter how many people are watching a Football game, the game takes the same amount of time. Hearing a court case is similar. More justices hearing a case does't speed up it up.
@yeatsdf @Shazamatazz1 @c_kedge @clevelandzilla @shambleslee@SusanPerry@neal_katyal No one was talking about the shooter. The previous post was that the "good guy with a gun" talking point isn't true. The original post is incorrect though as the Texas case proves...that good guys can stop criminals.
@c_kedge @clevelandzilla @shambleslee @Shazamatazz1 @SusanPerry@neal_katyal The whole point is anything in the constitution is governed by the federal government not states such as conceal carry (2A). Anything not specifically in the constitution should be left up to the states. It's the foundation of the constitution regards of your side of a topic.