Software engineering fundamentals are more important now than ever. I don't care what any influencer or CTO has said.
Good fundamentals means you can direct AI to write more productive code for you.
Bad fundamentals means your AI-written code will be a liability.
Whoever uses AI to write code should be ultimately responsible for that code and liable for any potential consequences of running that code.
I don't care what model you used, how you used it, or how much it helped you.
Humans bear full responsibility.
Vibe coding is a disaster.
"contrary to the hype, researchers have consistently found that AI-generated code is a bug-filled mess, forcing some programmers to pick up the pieces."
You slop, you flop.
@BenjaminDEKR Yes, the reason the TOS were violated was because OpenClaw was reverse-engineering the HTTP requests to the Claude Code Subscription (pretending it was Claude Code). If you create a skill that uses Claude Code (using the subscription) that does not break the TOS.
@BenjaminDEKR I donβt think itβs the automation that breaks the TOS though (from my understanding). Itβs that you are using automation outside of the Claude code terminal and trying to use the API directly which itβs not intended to be used that way. Again, I could be totally wrong
@geometricmagic Donβt skip the part of the article where the agent that manages the heartbeat for tasks needs to be very inexpensive or costs will skyrocket. Also that AI should be able to read directly from the database (without adding to context) and pass off only the needed info
@RileyRalmuto Show it actually doing something useful. Opening a browser window is not impressive, a simple public api could do that. All hype. Show 40 developer skills working together to create an app start to finish with one prompt and that would be impressive.