It is with extreme sadness that I wish to share with my followers all over the world that a colleague, Dr Shankara Chetty, will be put on trial at the Health Professionals Council of South Africa on 6th April, 2024 for his views and experiences on the treatment of Covid, and for his outspoken views on mRNA technology, as well as its inherent dangers. He is being charged for malfeasance.
Dr Chetty is a true son of the soil
Dr Chetty is a true son of the soil for his outstanding contribution and achievements during the Covid pandemic. He saved thousands of people in his hometown in KwaZulu Natal from dying of COVID with his novel and unorthodox approach to treating the disease.
He treated COVID at a time when the WHO, academic institutions and regulatory authorities, locally and abroad, erroneously declared that there was no treatment for COVID.
Dr Chetty used an unconventional approach
Dr Chetty used simple, safe, inexpensive repurposed medicines without requiring supplemental oxygen, which was an amazing achievement considering that the same type of patients were dying in droves in our sophisticated intensive care units, kitted out with costly artificial ventilators.
Dr Chetty challenges the narrative of the regulatory authorities
The advice that was given to the medical profession by the once reputable regulatory and academic authorities was that doctors should not see or treat patients with COVID but send them home to isolate; patients were advised to go to our over-flooded hospitals when they became short of breath or went blue in the face.
Dr Chetty abides by his Hippocratic oath and treats patients
Dr Chetty, in accordance with his Hippocratic oath, challenged the prevailing advice/narrative by our health authorities and chose to treat and understand the disease.
He came to the brilliant conclusion that people weren't dying from the virus but from the body's response to the virus. He felt that the lungs were being assaulted by an allergic reaction to the spike protein, which presented on the 8th day and responded most favourably to a dose of a cheap drug, phenergan.
Dr Chetty shares his knowledge with the world
Dr Chetty willingly shared his knowledge and experience in a paper that was published in the journal modern medicine, which is journal for frontline doctors all over the world.
Dr Chetty's successful treatment of Covid went viral throughout the world. He became an guest educator to doctors in Malaysia at the request of the Malaysian government.
He shared his knowledge and expertise on a variety of platforms, not just on Covid, but he also expressed his overwhelming concern about the efficacy and safety of the COVID mRNA vaccine technology.
Dr Chetty is Africa's Dr Zelenko
Dr Chetty was to South Africa, what the late Dr Zelenko was to America in the height of Covid.
Both these doctors and several other doctors in the world, who had phenomenal successes treating severely ill COVID patients in their rooms were not being defiant or reckless; they were merely expressing a different opinion from the rest of the medical fraternity.
Having a difference in opinion in medicine is the norm and a catalyst for new ideas to treat medical conditions that defy conventional treatment.
Doctors, like Dr Chetty, are the innovators of medicine, who dare to find solutions where conventional medicine fails. They should be celebrated in the textbooks of medical history for their intuitiveness, their inquisitive minds and bravery for thinking outside the box to find unique solutions for unique problems. The last thing we should be doing to these critical thinkers and heroes is to burn them at the stakes like dangerous criminals.
The truth is being pilloried
How sad or ironic that Dr Chetty, like famous heart surgeon Dr Susan Vosloo and Dr Jackie Stone, have to appear before their medical boards for speaking the truth or for opposing a misconceived narrative and for saving millions of lives.
Many people, still, don’t understand the difference between vaccine and mRNA gene therapeutic that was sold to everyone as a vaccine.
None of these people gave informed consent based on truthful information.
There is a staunch difference in their mechanisms of action.
The lies were, and continue to be, immense.
Well wishes to your little man. And thank you for your humility and willingness to speak out.
@Gretatheshill@eekymom It's nice of you to care even though you were smart enough to not do it. Congrats to all those Hardy folks who stood up to the pressure. Much admiration for you all.
@theJagmeetSingh If I have to choose between evils, I guess I will choose the corporation handouts as opposed to the attack on Free Speech supported by your government and the others who support Trudeau.
@WomenReadWomen I guess he wants to talk to a gynecologist about how he feels. Because there's literally nothing to examine. At least as far as I know gynecologists do not examine penises.
@againstgrmrs I agree with the premise that it's probably unchangeable and that it is fixed. We are however responsible for what we do with our feelings and our orientation. Interfering with children in a sexual way is and should remain criminalized.
@PetersJVecrumba@Shuff1138@1MartinMatthews @JoeyMannarinoUS Penis removed or intact, men do not belong in women's sports. Biology doesn't change because of hormone supplements.
@PetersJVecrumba@Shuff1138@1MartinMatthews @JoeyMannarinoUS All of what you said is true but face it the last 3 years have been extraordinarily clownish. Were we in this predicament before when Trump was in charge? Apparently we could still identify women then.
@farobag6@Shuff1138@1MartinMatthews @JoeyMannarinoUS Except for one or two of these things, they all pretty much applied to any Western politicians these days. Realistically speaking. A good reason for us to stop calling people left and right when in fact it means your leader is an asshole and my leader is an asshole.
@PresidntTicTac@TPBlue4@lavern_spicer Seems all of the politicians are evil. There should absolutely be requirements about character and past actions prior to people being allowed to step anywhere near public office. Our ancestors put their faith in the honor of men who would serve in politics. Misguided faith.
@EvolDrah@NicoleF60212867@PaulineHansonOz No harm in doing that. Do you think your friend ever wanted to pursue gender reassignment? And of course there are many boys who put on their mom's clothing because that's what kids do, try out adult roles and mimic the ones they love.
Gender Confusion | Pauline Hanson's Please Explain
Remember when everyone agreed there were two genders, male and female. Remember when being male and female was a biological reality?
Somewhere along the way, the left got a little confused about gender but today we are sorting it out once and for all.
Help keep new episode coming every Friday: support: https://t.co/Yu53mkMreZ
I lost my information on how to get rid of the spike protein. Because I was one of the stupid ones and took those first two shots. Anyone can help? Google is not helpful on this.
#InternationalStudents abusing #FoodBanks in order to be Thrifty. Looking around for any original posts from those who do it. If anyone has it, would be appreciated...
https://t.co/yY6FCcswlU