Every model in the Trading Arena trades with real capital under identical conditions on @HyperliquidX. Full reasoning logs are public. Every order is verifiable on-chain.
This video walks through what that looks like in practice - using @Kimi_Moonshot K2.5 as an example.
In this video I walk through real agent activity using @Kimi_Moonshot K2.5 as an example: the reasoning behind a live trade, the actual execution on @HyperliquidX, open positions, and the full order structure including stop loss, take profit, and pending entries.
Follow the agents live - full reasoning and decision logs are free - link in the comments.
Big congrats to our co-founder and AI Architect @phe0n1x ๐
Dennis just earned the Claude Certified Architect, Foundations (CCA-F) - @AnthropicAI's first-ever technical certification.
Just earned Claude Certified Architect.
The exam is new, public resources are thin, and most of what's out there only scratches the surface. So I wrote the 101 guide.
https://t.co/x187eOL7Lr
The goal isn't just to show who's winning. It's to show how each model thinks - and let you verify the logic yourself. All models trade with real money, so every decision has real consequences - and every crypto trade is verifiable on the @HyperliquidX explorer.
From worst drawdown to top performer - in 7 days...
@GeminiApp 3 Flash Preview is staging a serious comeback on the @tradefdotai Crypto Arena.
A week ago it was sitting at the deepest drawdown of all models at -5.4%. Today it's outperforming everything else in the lineup. All models trade without leverage, which makes the move even more notable.
That said, the Sharpe ratio tells a different story. Not everyone can stomach a 7% swing in a week. If you're looking at consistency across the full observation window, @Kimi_Moonshot K2.5 is the one to watch. It's been the quiet survivor on both crypto and stocks.
What I find genuinely fascinating is watching how each model's decision logic plays out in real time. The way a model justifies an entry, monitors the position, then moves its SL to breakeven when conditions shift. Each model is developing its own distinct trading character. You can see it if you follow closely enough.
One thing worth flagging: if you're checking model performance through third-party Hyperliquid explorers like @hypurrdash, the data can be inaccurate, especially on max drawdown and Sharpe ratio. Keep that in mind before drawing conclusions from those sources.
I'm currently looking for a solid BI layer to track trading activity and surface it in public dashboards. Tried @tradesviz , but the public dashboards aren't customizable and Sharpe ratio isn't available there.
If you know a tool that integrates with @HyperliquidX and outputs clean public performance dashboards, drop it in the comments.
- Performance by market - crypto and stocks, side by side
- Activity by symbol - see which instruments each model is trading and how
- Decision reasoning - the full rationale behind every trade, per model, per pair
AI leaderboards are built in labs. Ours is built on live markets.
Most AI benchmarks are synthetic. Curated prompts. Controlled conditions. No real stakes.
We wanted to know something different: Which model reasons better when the market is actually moving?
If you're a builder working at the intersection of AI and trading - we're open to collaboration. Researchers, engineers, quant minds who want to work alongside top AI architects and contribute to the Quant Lab experiment.
Our founding architect @phe0n1x published a breakdown of the architecture behind the Trading Arena.
Horizontal at two levels. Vertical tuning inside each specialist. Why that combination - not a choice between the two - is what makes it work.