tranquil

Turtle Soup.

[tranquil @tranquiltradez]

Quietly building.
Soon, my results will make the noise.

[Seyed Abbas Araghchi @araghchi]

This is not a rant by a random genocidal lunatic. It's a public post by the national security minister of the Israeli regime.

The genocidal death cult headquartered in Tel Aviv is a threat to all of humanity. It threatens all humans. Its only interest is permanent war.

[Raid @Romeotpt]

@Mrluffy594285 Why are you stupidly ignoring the MASSIVE move that’s gonna happen and make it reliant on a small little turtle soup happening first on a lower timeframe?

[aunicity @aunicity]

The realm of short term exponential growth is only accessible to those that can first sustain long term gradual growth

[Raid @Romeotpt]

When I win, I feel nothing.
When I lose, I feel nothing.

When I’m wrong, I feel nothing.
When I’m right, I feel nothing.

It’s only business.

[Raid @Romeotpt]

@tradesbysci Wrong.
1% risk is just a better more reliable and sustainable way of trading.
If you’re day trading for example or short term trading 1:3s with a 30% accuracy overtime that 1% will save your ass.
If it’s a 10% and not a 1% you’re down more than 70% in 10 trades.

[tranquil @tranquiltradez]

@fidaia4343 من وين هالخبر 😂🤣🤣🤣
غير صحيح

[tranquil @tranquiltradez]

@joarrry what's this pair?

[y @ysuckme]

worst case scenario I’ll make it. best case scenario I’ll make it big.

[محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf @mb_ghalibaf]

Operation Trust Me Bro failed. Now back to routine with Operation Fauxios.

[~V @vittorio_rossi_]

Price will go to your targets, but not in the way you expect.

[~V @vittorio_rossi_]

@cruncrr A constant updating of your own edge is paramount to trive in this hyper-competitive business.

[~V @vittorio_rossi_]

Win% rate, RR, risk per trade, trade frequency, trade duration, frequency and size of partials.

Play with these parameters twitching your own model around in order to obtain the best outcome from your imputs.

[~V @vittorio_rossi_]

@UsdNeo Yeah exactly, that was the logic behind it.

A temporary bounce caused by a change in the perceived valuation during the New York session, while in a heavily discounted market relative to the last few weeks price action.

Nothing new really.

Just a different level of reading it.

[nemmy @nemmyts]

Patience is a position.

[~V @vittorio_rossi_]

I open my charts at certain times.

If I see my model I execute;

if I don’t, I simply step aside.

[Umair K. @umairk99]

People are obsessed with the winning streak mindset and that’s the kill.
+X% doesn’t prove the edge. -Y% doesn’t break it. both are noise. Your brain sees the number and rewrites everything. tighten stops, add a filter, increase/reduce risk it scraps the whole thing and just run a good process into bad luck.
The real game is probability, not wins and losses.
You need enough trades logged (backtested + forward tested) before you see what’s actually real beneath the noise.​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Before that it’s chasing patterns in randomness. The market will fool you. Give wins to make you confident. Losses to make doubt. Both traps.
The discipline isn’t taking the trade. It’s ignoring the result.
Execute. Log it. Move on.

[ٰ @notsorealfgs]

i will win i promise

[zee @SnrZee]

2 years of struggle for a lifetime freedom

[nemmy @nemmyts]

@BasicsTrader never, I enjoy trading without needing validation from people I don't know online.

but on the contrary, I do enjoy showing from time to time what i'm doing and my outlook on price. which ill continue to do.

[ks @ksfades]

As always multi timeframe analysis is always superior, please get that in ur head