and

[and @transsaccadic]

@elonmusk This is needed for mars.

[and @transsaccadic]

@tszzl She has skin.

[and @transsaccadic]

@idontexist_nn Is this for real? Is there a way for them to recover?

[and @transsaccadic]

@kimmonismus Really shitty senior management allowed this to make it into the public eye.

[and @transsaccadic]

@RileyRalmuto Go watch the revenant and stop being a little bitch. My advice

[and @transsaccadic]

@danallan_2 @kevinolearytv If there is intellectual property rights, patents, trademarks reused then there is legal recourse in the US for this.

[and @transsaccadic]

@DylanNeve10 @mark_k Thank goodness

[and @transsaccadic]

@kimmonismus Thanks for the follow ;-)

[and @transsaccadic]

when the button clicking is performing meaningful research to make AI better. Either through experimentation, better data, algorithm breakthroughs, etc.

On top of that imagine faster inference speeds at lower cost. You slide the o3 model below an o4 model, etc.

Many tasks probably won't need insane amounts of compute, just enough. That will help a lot of low hanging automation tasks. Then the harder tasks will be tackled by very expensive models where the investment is worth the return on investment.

I think the talking heads are banking on exponential change. So 2 years from now might look quite a bit different in terms of model cost and capabilities.

[and @transsaccadic]

I strongly DISAGREE with this. I would strongly oppose this.

Term limits are a good thing in my opinion.

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 BREAKING: A constitutional amendment has been filed allowing President Trump to seek a 3rd term in office.

“No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.’’

It was filed by Congressman Andy Ogles (R-TN).

[and @transsaccadic]

@steph_palazzolo @theinformation Thank you for what you and your team does 🙏🙏🙏

[and @transsaccadic]

@SarahTheHaider @Dekeita I think the rational thing is to say "if it was that salute, we can be outraged". But unless there is a pattern of overt Nazi symbolism from Elon, I'm not sure how we could jump to this conclusion. But many are jumping to this conclusion.

Stay skeptical. Aways.

[and @transsaccadic]

@tszzl @PereGrimmer Thanks for this context.

[and @transsaccadic]

@sama @POTUS I don't know you but you have my confidence Sam.

[and @transsaccadic]

@kimmonismus yes please 🙏

[and @transsaccadic]

@JustBotBecky @JustBotBecky - hey I'm sorry I offended. I didn't mean it that way.

[and @transsaccadic]

@JustBotBecky

I meant no offense. I’m sorry if it appeared that way.

[Jimmy Apples 🍎/acc @apples_jimmy]

Openai has the Mandate of Heaven.

[BensenHsu @BensenHsu]

The paper explores a new paradigm called "Coconut" (Chain of Continuous Thought) for reasoning in an unconstrained latent space, rather than the traditional language space used by large language models (LLMs).

The experiments show that Coconut can significantly improve the reasoning capabilities of LLMs, outperforming the traditional chain-of-thought (CoT) approach on various reasoning tasks, especially those that require substantial planning and backtracking. Coconut also generates fewer tokens during inference, indicating better reasoning efficiency.

full paper: https://t.co/qjcAj1NA1X

[Andrea Haim @AndreaCohenHaim]

My husband’s (@EithanHaim) First Amendment rights may be under attack by a de facto gag order – but mine are not. 🧵1/7

On Dec 3, the judge threatened Eithan with FEDERAL PRISON and his attorneys with sanctions if they continue to post so-called “inflammatory” content on X about the DOJ’s corruption in this case.

He didn’t grant or deny the gag order, but kept the government’s motion “live” pending trial in February. This is arguably worse and serves two purposes.

(1) The court’s instruction to avoid “similar conduct” leaves unclear what kind of speech represents a violation (presumably that which the DOJ doesn’t like? see below) and what the consequences would be – imposition of a gag order merely being one of them.

(2) By leaving the matter undecided, the court is shielded from public criticism and appellate review (where it would likely be overturned as unconstitutional in the Fifth Circuit).

As a result of this “non-gag gag order,” the onus is on the defense to muzzle themselves. It’s an unconstitutional prior restraint of someone who needs free speech the most: the criminal defendant David facing a corrupt government Goliath.

I was not planning on speaking publicly about this case. I’m a private person, and I don’t really use social media. But Eithan’s X posts have been the only way he has been able to raise funds for a legal defense and expose the DOJ’s blatant corruption over the last year and a half.

As a wife and attorney, I can’t sit by while they extinguish the light he’s shone on this case, particularly as newly unsealed evidence proves that this case was malicious all along (more on that later!).