I’m under the belief that if America’s best athletes like Randy Moss, Deion Sanders, LeBron etc played soccer their whole lives the U.S. would win literally every #WorldCup.
Under capitalism, socialists are free to build socialism.
Under socialism, capitalists aren’t free to build anything.
Nothing stops a group of socialists pooling their money, forming a company, and splitting every wage and every pound of profit perfectly equally.... Or to donate all profit to the government.
It’s legal. It’s easy. Owning the means of production is as simple as setting up a company.
Marx wrote his manifesto before the invention of limited liability companies. Back then “seize the factory” meant seizing it from the handful of families who could afford one.
That argument expired the day anyone could start a company with limited liability, raise investment and hire who they want.
Socialists are free to lead by example and demonstrate their system works. They can out-recruit, out-motivate, out-build and out innovate based on their ideas if they like. It would prove the philosophy works. Capitalism will happily host their experiment.
The fact that nobody does this tells you a lot.
It is time for the United States Postal Service to ban junk mail.
Unsolicited spam calls are already prohibited by the FCC. Emails are heavily regulated by the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. Junk mail is the majority of mail, 100 million trees per year. Enough!
Britain is a speck. Africa is a continent. Only a suicidal idiot pretends we can swallow it whole.
Look again at that map. The blue outline isn’t some random African blob, it’s England, our entire island nation, dropped onto the vastness of Africa for scale.
One tiny, rain-soaked, historically English rock placed against the Democratic Republic of Congo alone, a country nearly ten times our size.
Africa itself could swallow the British Isles dozens of times over and barely notice.
Yet the same people who lecture us about “compassion” and “diversity” insist this postage stamp of a homeland must fling open its doors to endless hordes from that continent and beyond.
What utter, manipulative bollocks.
Africa spans over 30 million square kilometres with 54 countries and 1.4 billion people and growing faster than anywhere on Earth.
Nigeria alone will hit 400 million by 2050. Congo, Sudan, Somalia, Eritrea vast territories, immense resources, yet perpetual chaos, tribal slaughter, corruption, and fertility rates that mock any notion of sustainability.
Their young men aren’t “fleeing” because there’s literally nowhere else on their gigantic continent; they’re coming here because Europe’s idiot elites turned welfare magnets into beacons for the world’s surplus population.
England is not “nowhere else to go.” It is the only homeland our people have ever known.
A finite island forged by the English, for the English.
the descendants of those who tamed it, defended it, and built the greatest civilisation this planet has seen.
We are already 67 million strong on these crowded shores, with native birth rates suppressed and our cities groaning under the weight of parallel societies, knife crime, grooming gangs, and collapsing services.
Every additional boatload whether Pakistani, Nigerian, Somali, or Afghan whatever Tom dick and Harry, isn’t enrichment. It’s dilution. It’s dispossession.
The intellectual reality, delivered without the usual cowardly euphemisms: this cannot work.
It has never worked.
You do not transplant tens of millions from low-trust, low-IQ, high-fertility, clan-based, often cousin-marrying cultures, many steeped in the supremacist ideology of Islam or worse into a high-trust, high-investment, native European society and expect harmony.
You get what we already see in Newham, Tower Hamlets, Bradford, and Birmingham: electoral capture by foreign blocs, no-go areas, skyrocketing welfare dependency, and native English families priced out or driven out.
Europe’s strange death, accelerated by a pathological altruism that mistakes weakness for virtue.
We owe these people nothing.
The natives of these isles built this country. We paid for it. We died for it. It belongs to us.
Remigration on a serious, unapologetic scale is not “far-right extremism.” It is basic arithmetic and national survival.
Prioritise the English people in their own homeland.
Africa has space.
The Middle East has space.
Pakistan has space.
Let them fix their own failures instead of exporting them to the one place that still works, for now.
England is our only home.
Tiny, precious, irreplaceable.
We’ve had enough of pretending otherwise.
The hordes keep coming only because traitorous elites allow it.
Time to reclaim our birthright, and ensure that this sceptred isle remains English.
Anything less is national suicide sold as kindness.
The map doesn’t lie. Neither should we.
This might be one of the most important sleep papers in the last decade...
In a 10-year study of over 3,200 adults, those with irregular bedtimes had a 2x higher risk of major cardiovascular events compared to those with consistent sleep schedules, but only if they were also sleeping less than ~8 hours per night.
Wake-up time didn’t matter nearly as much.
In today's newsletter.
https://t.co/pxoIinYm84
What if AI doesn’t need to show an immediate ROI but instead is the plausible deniability companies use to RIF 50% of the workforce they already knew did nothing??
Incentives explain behavior
If a nation has generous welfare, then it will attract immigrants who need welfare
If politicians can gain power from increasing immigration, they will expand welfare to immigrants under the guise of compassion
The highest welfare-use demographic is illegal immigrants.
Wild.
This is insane…
Mamdani calls out first, and by name, a "White supremacist" for protesting.
He then leaves out the 2 Muslim men, Emir Balat and Ibrahim Kayumi, who were arrested by NYPD after they yelled "Allahu Akbar!" and threw a homemade bomb into the crowd.
Let me explain how it benefits Americans
1) No nukes for Iran
2) No ICBMs capable of hitting the US
3) Eliminates proxies and funding for terrorism
4) Hurts BRICS
5) Puts China’s energy suppliers under US influence
6) Stability/security in ME
7) Epicenter of Islamism is gone
Matt, this is not accurate to what the President actually stated are the goals of Operation Epic Fury.
The President did not say the objective was to “bring freedom to the Iranian people.” He was clear: the goals are to end Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons, end the expanding ballistic missiles program, stop its development of ICBMs designed to reach Europe and eventually the United States, and neutralize threats to close the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most strategically vital economic choke points.
He also pointed directly to Iran’s record of killing hundreds of Americans through proxies and let alone its attempts to assassinate him, twice. Those are not abstract humanitarian concerns. They are direct threats to American lives and American interests.
Regime change, as the President stated, would be a byproduct if it occurs, not the strategic objective. The objective is threat elimination tied directly to U.S. national interests.
You ask how this benefits Americans.
A nuclear-armed Iran fundamentally alters the strategic balance in the Middle East. It deters U.S. freedom of action. It shields proxy networks that have targeted Americans for decades. It increases the likelihood of nuclear proliferation across the region. It raises the probability of coercion against global energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil supply transits. Economic shock there is not Israel’s problem. It is America’s problem. It hits U.S. consumers, U.S. markets, and U.S. strategic stability.
You cannot simultaneously argue that Iran is harmless and that preventing its nuclear breakout is unnecessary. Nor can you ignore that deterrence works precisely because capability and intent matter before a threat fully matures. Strategic theory is clear on this point. Waiting until an adversary achieves protected nuclear breakout status dramatically increases the cost of preventing catastrophe later.
“America First” does not mean America alone or America isolated. It means U.S. power is used in service of U.S. interests. The Trump administration has repeatedly demonstrated that force can be applied with limited, defined objectives tied to national security rather than open-ended nation building. Peace through strength is not a slogan. It is a deterrence framework rooted in capability, credibility, and clarity of purpose.
You also raise domestic political consequences. Elections matter. But national security decisions cannot be reduced to midterm calculations. If preventing a hostile regime from acquiring nuclear weapons and expanding a ballistic missile arsenal aimed at our allies and potentially our homeland is not worth political risk, then we have redefined leadership in purely partisan terms.
Demanding clarity is not disloyalty. It is responsible citizenship. But the case has been made. It is grounded in preventing nuclear proliferation, degrading missile capability, protecting global economic stability, deterring attacks on Americans, and preserving U.S. strategic freedom of action in a region that still matters to our security and our economy.
If someone does not understand the strategic logic of preventing nuclear breakout, missile expansion, and economic coercion, then the solution is not to assume there is no logic. It is to engage with experts in U.S. foreign policy, strategic theory, and Middle East security who have studied these dynamics for decades.
This is not about abstract freedom promotion. It is about concrete American interests.
And yes, we should pray for our country. But we should also understand the stakes clearly.
"People wring their hands and say that there must be "better ways of finding solutions" than warfare. Of course there are. We have already found them. The nations and people of the West use them all the time. They are openness, tolerance, reason, respect for human rights — the fundamental institutions of our civilisation. But no way of finding solutions is so effective that it can work when it isn't being used. And when a violent group defines itself by its comprehensive rejection of all the values on which problem-solving and the peaceful resolution of disputes depend, and embarks instead on a campaign of unlimited murder and destruction, it is morally wrong as well as factually inaccurate to represent this as a case of our needing "better ways of finding solutions". That is why we have to insist, by force if necessary, that everyone else in the world also respect, and enforce, the minimum standards of civilisation and human rights. Western standards."
~Conjecture Institute Advisor @DavidDeutschOxf (2001)
These people do not process that this man woke up and intentionally dressed like a militia movie character and intentionally armed himself and intentionally went to a federal operation and intentionally interfered with it and intentionally resisted arrest and intentionally pulled his gun. Leftists cannot comprehend agency and therefore believe instead that he literally spawned on the sidewalk and through a series of fascist coincidences he was executed for exercising his constitutional right to do whatever he wants without consequences