@chip_bennett@RekietaLaw@ahopson32 Absent more information they cannot prove it wasn't self defense.
It is on the prosecutor to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, not the on her to prove innocence.
@LCruz1997x@NatetheLawyer@LuciousMuffins I'll admit I am not a expert on Florida law, I do know that just having a gun is not escalation unless threat or clear intent is shown.
In fact it is often a deterrent.
This does not make her the aggressor.
I think that we need more info either way.
https://t.co/ZYhXdJ07EH
"You can’t brandish a gun without an actual reasonable threat of great bodily harm against you."
Not strictly speaking correct. You can't SHOOT the gun until those circumstances. That doesn't mean you can't PRESENT the gun for the purpose of deterring those circumstances from developing.
@Rickisback_ON_X Remember it started under the Biden Administration as well....
Is this why they pushed Kamala instead of a primary that Newsome might have won?
@NatetheLawyer That is edited and cut. None are uncut videos showing the full confrontation.
Please don't claim to have the full video and post a edited news clip.
@ValVenisEnt FACT: we have not seen the full UNCUT video. (i have looked all are edited/cut)
While I am leaning toward self defense but more evidence needed to ensure justice is done.
@NatetheLawyer@LuciousMuffins It goes towards intent. It also shows state of mind that she might have intentionally provoked him.
We are missing some of the video.
While what we know now LEANS towards self defense, i want more information before I would call it either direction.
AS SHOULD YOU.
@NatetheLawyer At worst it is manslaughter but I am leaning towards the self defense side.
He is erratic and aggressive, while yes pointing the gun and walking towards him did not help, and this could all have been avoided.
More evidence should clear this up.
@IngrahamAngle Keep in mind birth tourism has been going on since the 90's thanks to Clintons pro relations with China shit.
Now those Children are having children that are ALSO US citizens.
@TheBrancaShow@Anc_Aesthetics How about if we just designate all illegal entry as a foreign invader and also remove dual citizenship.
Cannot be a citizen of another nation and one of the US to accept or be a citizen of another nation automatically revokes US citizenship.
Both should be passible by statute.
@RepBoebert How about just designate every illegal entry as a foreign invader.
This would not apply to visa overstays but would definitely stop a lot of this shit.
@HoegLaw SO if you passed legislation that designates all people who enter illegally as foreign invaders????
Pretty sure that would solve the problem. Also the due process issues...