Trevor Leong

[Trevor Leong @trevcorzz]

@604RAW idiots with cameras

[Trevor Leong @trevcorzz]

@ChaosTV these guys filming or unempathetic idiots

[Trevor Leong @trevcorzz]

Somebody fine Said Martinez for the worst most obviously fucked call awarding Belgium a penalty kick against Senegal in the 120th minute!! Robbery! Rigged! Ruining the game! And Tielemans should be fined for flopping!

[Mr. Pool @MrPoolQ1]

Eric Trump just flipped the script on Chris Cuomo live on-air, leaving him shocked.

Cuomo accused President Trump of going after his political opponents the moment he took office…

Eric sounded off:

“Did we, did we try and bankrupt Biden? Did we raid Biden's home? Did we try and bankrupt Biden?”

“Did we weaponize every AG and DA against Biden? Do we do that against Hunter Biden who had a laptop from hell, pictures of cocaine, illicit drug use, prostitution?”

“Did we make up a dirty dossier? About Biden, did they try and destroy Biden's marriage? Did we make up stories that Biden had secret servers in the basement of his home communicating with the Kremlin in Russia?”

“Did we strip Biden off the ballot of multiple states? Did we take Biden off of Twitter and Instagram and Facebook and try and silence his voice so he couldn't communicate?”

“Did we put Biden in a courtroom every single day for nonsense to try and keep him off of a campaign trail to try and destroy his life?”

Well done @MrPoolQ1

[Trevor Leong @trevcorzz]

@mjc_cook somebody follow this fool around with a camera and see how he likes it, I’ll pay you

[Trevor Leong @trevcorzz]

@mjc_cook dumbass unempathetic morons with cameras

[Trevor Leong @trevcorzz]

@ChaosTV dumbass unempathetic morons with cameras

[The SCIF @TheSCIF]

Maricopa County Election Director admits in court that employees were logging in to the election system FROM HOME to REMOTELY verify ballot signatures in the 2020 election and others, with ZERO OBSERVERS, or any physical oversight whatsoever.

This creates a major security vulnerability and lack of transparency/chain-of-custody in one of the most important steps of the ballot verification process.

21%-25% or 420,000+ ballots in Maricopa County alone failed signature verification.

ANYONE could be accessing the data from someone's house or that worker could be hacked and gain access to the entire system. This is a HUGE breach of security and compromised the entire 2020 and 2022 elections.

[Brandon Tatum @TheOfficerTatum]

🚨WATCH: I'm American first, not "Black first."

Black people aren't a monolith. Different histories, different countries, different experiences. Leading with skin color over shared values is a box I refuse to put myself in. I believe in this country and what it offers.

Shoutout to @stephenasmith for inviting me on his show! Go give him a follow!

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 NOW: Americans are noticing that Japanese World Cup fans are doing MASS CLEANUPS of AMERICAN STADIUMS after the match

"In Japan, we are taught to clean up in school"

Thug cultures destroy and ravage, others clean and build!

This is why we LOVE JAPAN! PURE CLASS ACT! 🇺🇸🇯🇵

[James Li @5149jamesli]

Let me help everybody out.

Many probably remember Gavin Newsom's infamous French Laundry scandal where he ignored all Covid protocols (which he implemented) to have a private party at the exclusive Napa restaurant.

Well, what many people don't know about the story is that the dinner was hosted by a PG&E lobbyist named Jason Kinney.

PG&E is responsible for igniting hundreds of fires in California, including the 2018 Camp Fire, which killed 85 residents in town called Paradise, CA.

Newsom, who takes hundreds of thousands in donations from PG&E, arranged to have the victims paid in part with the company's stock, instead of cash, and in part with a taxpayer-funded slush fund. Predictably the stock price plummeted after the scandal was made public, leaving the victims billions short what they were initially owed.

He then set up something called the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), which was supposed to grant "safety certificates" to make sure PG&E was compliant with safety regulations. Except, per whistleblower complaints, the CPUC was effectively controlled by Newsom, and functioned essentially as a rubber stamp for PG&E.

In short, Newsom ignored court rulings and rigged California law to bail out a major corporate donor, trading policy favors for campaign cash while sticking wildfire victims with the bill.

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

There are no coincidences.

God bless Secretary Turner.

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

Saving LA - Phase III

[MJTruthUltra @MJTruthUltra]

The November 3, 2020 Election will go down in history as the greatest theft in American history. Nothing like this has ever occurred before..

The entire 2020 election was decided by 4 extreme updates within a 5 hour window, which statistically hold a probability rate of less than 0.1% of happening…. Which basically means it’s mathematical impossible what happened.

Clip
https://t.co/2G7diyhoU4
Full Video
https://t.co/jvEzjNnPbb

[Trevor Leong @trevcorzz]

@atrupar Lmao “30” years, still thinks like a child

[Trevor Leong @trevcorzz]

@atrupar Chris what happened to you man

[Trevor Leong @trevcorzz]

@AntiToxicPeople you’re pretty oblivious

[Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll]

THE FORMULAS
WHAT THEY MEAN AND WHY THEY MATTER

I derived four deterministic linear formulas from the ballot drop data:

Raman% = 27.87 + (3.19 × drop number)
Pratt% = 22.05 - (1.17 × drop number)
Bass% = 40.20 - (1.86 × drop number)
Other% = 9.88 - (0.16 × drop number)
The Starting Points

The constants - 27.87, 22.05, 40.20, 9.88 - represent each candidate’s baseline. Where they genuinely stood when post-election counting began. Real votes. Organic support. These are the numbers before anything unusual occurs.

The Slopes - How the Formula Runs

The slope is the increment applied to each candidate every single drop. It gets multiplied by drop number - 1, 2, 3, 4 - which means the effect escalates automatically with each drop.

So for Raman it isn’t just plus 3.19% every drop. It’s:

Drop 1: 27.87 + (3.19 × 1) = 31.06%
Drop 2: 27.87 + (3.19 × 2) = 34.25%
Drop 3: 27.87 + (3.19 × 3) = 37.44%
Drop 4: 27.87 + (3.19 × 4) = 40.63%
Drop 5 predicted: 27.87 + (3.19 × 5) = 43.82%

Each drop pushes her further from her baseline. It is built in. Automatic by design.

The slopes also sum to exactly zero.

+3.19 - 1.17 - 1.86 - 0.16 = 0.00

Every percentage point Raman gains comes precisely from the other three candidates/groups combined. This is a closed system. Conservation of votes. The formula doesn’t create votes - it redistributes them.

The R Values - The results were remarkable

To validate these formulas I ran linear regression analysis. The Pearson correlation coefficients, R values, came back as follows:

Raman vs Pratt: R = 0.9966
Raman vs Bass: R = 0.9934
Raman vs Batch: R = 0.9984
Raman vs Other: R = 0.9794

R values measure how perfectly data fits a straight line. They run from 0 to 1.

0 means completely random.
No pattern whatsoever.

1 means a perfect straight line.
Every point exactly where predicted.

For context:

0.70 is considered strong in social science research.
0.85 gets researchers excited.
0.90+ is extraordinarily rare in human behavioral data.

Squaring them to get R² values:

Raman vs Pratt: R² = 0.9932
Raman vs Bass: R² = 0.9869
Raman vs Other: R² = 0.9592
Raman vs Batch: R² = 0.9968

That last number, 0.9968, means that 99.68% of Raman’s vote share movement across these drops is explained by a single variable. Drop number. Nothing else. Just counting to five.

You get R values like that in physics experiments. In controlled laboratory conditions. Measuring the expansion of metal under heat. Not in elections. Not in a major American city with millions of diverse voters casting ballots across weeks.

The Slope Relationship

The slope of 3.110 between Raman and Pratt is particularly significant.

It means for every percentage point Pratt lost Raman gained 3.110 points. Every drop. Without variation. Without noise.

Candidates in a democratic election don’t move in mathematical opposition to each other at a fixed ratio across 200,000 ballots. Four variables in an equation do.

Why The Shutoff Had To Exist

Because drop number keeps increasing, the formula keeps pushing percentages further from baseline. Left unchecked by drop 7 the math produces:

Raman: 27.87 + (3.19 × 7) = 50.2%
Pratt: 22.05 - (1.17 × 7) = 13.9%
Bass: 40.20 - (1.86 × 7) = 27.2%

So the formula was never intended to run to completion. It was designed to run until a specific objective was achieved, Raman leading Pratt by a sufficient margin to secure the runoff and then stop.

The stopping condition appears to have been triggered at approximately 38,000 votes into drop 5. The precise moment Raman crossed 3,000 votes ahead of Pratt.

After that point the remaining 9,800 votes in drop 5 distributed at approximately the baseline that existed after drop four.

The formula completed its task. Then it stopped. And the numbers went back to looking normal.

[Trevor Leong @trevcorzz]

@ggreenwald @yesnicksearcy used to follow you Glenn