Thank you for your response! I am encouraged and believe this sort of thoughtful answer is excellent for discourse on the topic.
I do have a response to you crafted, though I would like to ask you to discuss your point of view and politely debate this topic in a video-recorded, in-person format on my platform.
I host few interviews; however, it appears we will both be in the Capital at the end of the month, and I think the public would have a voracious appetite to see an accomplished USG official like yourself and me respectfully debate these points and explore the Legacy Program vs. sensor data discussion topic!
If you are open to this, please connect with me here on Twitter DMs where we can exchange emails/Signal contact. I would be happy to set up a time, date, and location.
SPECIAL ACCESS REQUIRED - the Secrecy of UFO Crash Retrieval Programs
https://t.co/aVgmDYqq8A
Part 2 of 2 into investigating the security architecture behind UFO crash retrieval and reverse engineering programs. This massive exploration seeks to uncover the who, what, when, where, and why behind the covert nature of the UFO Legacy Program portfolio.
Watch Part 1 here: https://t.co/HfyPZ3xGA5
Best visualized as an onion, the UFO portfolio secrecy apparatus is seemingly structured as an infinite series of "layers", where the center of the onion is the core truths, materials, senior leadership, biologics, etc of the behind the UFO effort and seemingly infinite layers of protectoin exist to keep even presidential administrations and "temporary employees" one layer away from the beating heart of UFO Legacy Programs.
Today's project seeks to explore the current-day structure and layers of this onion, a fragmented and scattered "Manhattan Project 2.0." Indeed, today, the UFO Legacy Program portfolio seemingly operates in an extremely compartmentalized structure, featuring a fractured control group and select few personnel who can peer across the "silos" into other programs housed under a bizarre quasi-government and industry control group.... But this wasn't always the case....
This project picks up where Part 1 left off, where in 1994 the Special Access Program (SAP) enterprise was restructured to safely gatekeep USG access and vest permanent control of the UFO portfolio within the above-mentioned quasi-industry and government group.
Here I seek to perform an exhaustive dive into the structure of Special Access Programs (SAPs), Controlled Access Programs (CAPs), and Covert Action Programs (also CAPs), and explore how and why such compartmented national programs are the PERFECT ecosystem for hiding UFO crash retrieval and exploitation activities.
This investigation will explore the types of SAPs, protection levels of SAPs, governance structure of SAPs, and the who, what, when, where, and why of how SAPs operate.... Ultimately, giving examples for how each SAP type (Acquisition, Intelligence, and Operations and Support) with waived unacknowledged status can house UFO activities.
Indeed, the project will also explore SPECIFIC loopholes UFO Legacy Programs have exploited within White House SAPs and Covert Action Programs out of the National Security Council to operate "Non-Covert Action Programs" - programs with managed need-to-know (MNTK) access and mighty SAP security protocols with completely waived reporting and budgetary requirements! As this investigation will argue, this is done by taking White House SAP Non-Covert Action Programs and applying the "Content-Only SAP" designation to exist in a quasi Title 10 and Title 50 state!
Though the SAP ecosystem is absolutely the most critical piece of the investigation, this documentary also explores deputized agencies and services that mitigate program exposure and insider/outsider threat protection with DARPA SID, DOE OICI, AFOSI/PJ, and AFLCMC/IP, addresses onion-sponsored narrative control and disinformation campaigns including the Robertson Panel, Condon Committee, AARO, and AAWSAP, and evaluates much of the body of the modern-day onion through the concept of "unrivaled secrecy."
Short list of the MANY things we will explore today:
- Continued investigation into UFO Legacy Programs being housed (partially modern day) within the National Security Council's subgroup on covert action (5412 Special Group, 303 Committee, etc)
- Define DoD Special Access Programs (SAPs), Intelligence Community Controlled Access Programs (CAPs), and National Security Council Covert Action Programs (Also CAPs)
- Explore how the National Security Council (NSC) has utilized White House SAPs with the "Content-Only" budgetary tier/administrative designation to create "Non-Covert Action Programs effectively" that waive ALL budgetary and reporting requirements
- Define the Content-Only SAP designation and describe how making a SAP contain CPI (Critical Program Information) is imperative to Legacy Program Secrecy
- Explain 10 USC § 119 and 50 USC § 3093 and argue why these UFO White House SAP Non-Covert Action Programs exist in a grey area between Title 10 and Title 50, not adherent to either's reporting structure
- Define and give examples for the three types and three protection levels of SAPs - Acquisition, Intelligence, Operations, and Support, and Acknowledged, Unacknowledged, and Waived, respectively
- Construct an illustrative example of how each type of SAP would be used on the Hidden Wing UFO exploitation program out of Air Force Acquisition
- Identify how all points above are massaged to completely waive congressional briefings and traditional oversight reporting for UFO-related SAPs
- Study SAP naming conventions and additional security controls such as NOFORN (Not Releasable to Foreign National)
- Identify how @ENERGY SAPs answer to their own statutory authority and get real spooky, real fast!
- Explore the SAP governance hierarchy, including: Component SAPCO (SAP Special Office), USD SAPCO, DoD SAPCO, SAPOC (SAP Central Office), and SRG (Senior Review Group)
- Argue why DoD SAPCO, SAPOC, and SRG are premier gatekeeping institutions for USG access into the programs
- Identify relevant USD (Undersecretary of Defense) departments connected to specific SAP types and capable of UFO activities (USD(I&S), USD(A&S), USD(R&E))
- Discuss several funding schemes the Legay structure harnesses for program funding: haircuts across black projects and unexpected offices/services, self-fund through cutout activities, hiding budget in generic DoD budgets with Content-Only SAPs, criminal enterprises, IR&D, etc
- Name several agencies/services within USG SAP architecture that serve as program protection and exposure mitigation for the Legacy apparatus, including: AFOSI/PJ (Office of Special Projects), DOE OICI (Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence), AFLCMC/IP (Air Force Life Cycle Management Center Information Protection Directorate), and DARPA SID (Security & Intelligence Directorate)
- While on the subject of DARPA, identify Dr. Peter Highman (Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of War for Critical Technologies, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering) as a senior Legacy Program scientist at the upper echelons of the SAP ecosystem
- Discuss narrative campaigns/disinformation operations from the Legacy onion, including 1953 Robertson Panel, 1969 Condon Committee, and 2022 AARO
- Explore NSC, James Clapper-sponsored partial transparency campaigns through the AATIP (allegedly)
- Identify the frontman for these operations, Lue Elizondo (allegedly)
- Inquire into how the Clapper/Elizondo partial transparency campaign evolved through AATIP, TTSA, the 2017 NYT article, the 2024 hearings, and Age of Disclosure (allegedly)
- Isolate on Lue Elziondo's former position as Director, National Programs Special Management Staff (NPMS) under USD(I&S), and once again ask if Elizondo has prior experience WITHIN the Legacy Programs and possibly exposed Tom Delonge to elements of the NSC Immaculate Constellation Activity (allegedly)
- Criticize the evolved narrative-campaign, amnesty please, and incomplete legacy outline presented in the Age of Disclosure Documentary, and ask why the National Security Council is missing from the Legacy Program silo falsely presented as the monolithic Legacy Program
- So much more, I am just scratching the surface!!
Thank you @imxanderjones for the great music and thank you @UAPNinja for making me a 3D printed Flux Liner!
DISCLOSURE DAY increased ~40% domestically yesterday and is having better-than-expected weekdays overseas.
Powered by Father’s day, Spielberg’s new film is now on track to hit $165M-185M this coming weekend on a $115M budget.
“Disclosure Day,” a tale of aliens on Earth and the coverup of their presence, starring Emily Blunt and Josh O’Connor, is a catalogue of Steven Spielberg’s obsessions, and a deeply personal vision. https://t.co/sd5uwXHI9M
In one remarkable week, I got to see DISCLOSURE DAY with George Knapp in Las Vegas on Monday and with Jesse Michels in Austin on Saturday — two of the sharpest, most compelling voices in the UFO/UAP conversation. Two cities, two great minds, one very strange moment in history. What a time to be alive!
@JeremyCorbell@AmericanALCHMY
Remember that one time catastrophic disclosure could not be confirmed or denied legally to prevent a whistleblower from getting killed for treason?
To the UFO community, please wake up to what has occurred around you the last month.
We're talking about power sources leaked from whistleblower testimony.
Please, for the love of God, family, country, ask ODNI, CIA, AARO, ICIG to clarify.
As of this time, NO ONE has asked or reported their statements.
Sorry, feeling spicy 🌶
Spielberg’s DISCLOSURE DAY crossed the $100M mark worldwide yesterday, 4 days after its domestic opening.
It’s now the fastest original film to hit the century milestone this decade, outperforming SINNERS and HOPPERS.
@UAPGERB They are giving us the run around now. I think the new administration’s disclosure push is going to be much more gradual than initially anticipated.
Mr. Mellon,
While many, including myself, appreciate your tenacity here, this is a perplexing tweet...
You are calling for the release of UAP space data, satellite data, and detection from the Ballistic Missile Early Warning System; however, you yourself have commented on several occasions on the existence of both the legacy programs and recovered materials/biological samples.
The number one example that comes to mind is this redacted Signal messaging screenshot you released in 2024 in response to Sean Kirkpatrick voluntarily offering Signal exchanges between you and him for a FOIA release.
This redacted exchange with an unknown individual not only confirms you know the management structure, security control systems, and ownership of the crash retrieval portfolio, but that you are also aware of a highly classified memo by SecAF in the 1950s that is still in effect to maintain cover for the legacy programs.
Indeed, you also in this exchange confirm you are aware of the Air Force legacy SES-2 gatekeeper (likely Russel E. Wyler) and state the 1953 Kingman, Arizona UFO crash was indeed real and recovered.
So why exactly is this memo by a former SecAF or the release of the Kingman wreckage and biologics not a priority for you? These have lower precedence than your listed IMINT/SIGINT data?....
You have said similar things on several occasions regarding UFO retrieval and exploitation, including a 2023 NewsNation appearance with Chris Cuomo where you stated: "I’ve been told that we have recovered technology that did not originate on this Earth, by officials in the Department of Defense and by former intelligence officials."
https://t.co/Bnin6fajhK
This feels like a bizarre pivot back to your and Mr. Elizondo's ~ 2017-2023 narrative of discussing an amorphous non-human presence on this planet without breaking into the fine details of recovered technical vehicles or biologics.
At the same time, I find it bizarre that your list is excluding maritime UFO sensor data encounters. We know, all the way back to the days of Project Blue Book, USO/maritime UFO encounters are often strikingly anomalous and occur almost more frequently than any space-based UFO monitoring and tracking.
Others and I share the concern that within the Age of Disclosure documentary, Jay Stratton, who retired as a Defense Intelligence Senior Executive (DISES) from the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), purposefully excluded Navy elements from the film's "Legacy Program" outline to protect his Naval interest or prior exposure to Naval Legacy Elements. Mr. Mellon, are you doing the same? Admiral Gallaudet has advocated for the study of UFO/USO in maritime environments tirelessly. Why do you not also advocate for release of such data?
An additional worthy pursuit, as I have publicly requested, is for you to comment on your former SSCI coworker, Mary K. Sturtevant. As I have stated, I am aware that whilst Sturtevant was Lockheed Martin VP of Government Affairs and VP for Intelligence, Joint and Science & Technology Progams, she aided in the blocking of the Kona Blue PSAP UFO materials transfer between Lockheed Martin and the AAWSAP. My public request to you can be found here:
https://t.co/gAD3Lv6R6V
Why is UFO retrieval, exploitation, and reverse engineering, for which you have advocated transparency in the past, taking a backseat to a handful of specific sensor data?
NEW: David Grusch describes UFOs that crashed and were recovered by the U.S. Govt — “I’ve seen the recovered vehicles”
“A bunch of different morphologies the U.S. Govt has recovered from eggs, to discs, to crescent moon boomerang-type vehicles.”
“I think the Administration will release that information in a further drop.”
“It changed my worldview.”
UFO Whistleblower David Grusch says he is fearful for his life
Some of the witnesses Grusch has interviewed regarding UFO programs have died under mysterious circumstances and been victim of Havana Syndrome attacks
He says he and his wife have been targetted and subjected to administrative terrorism