Genocide requires specific intent to destroy a national/ethnic group as such.
Holocaust: Nazis killed 6M Jews in camps/gas chambers with explicit plan to annihilate them.
Armenian: Ottomans killed ~1M via death marches and massacres to erase them.
Rwandan: Hutus killed ~800k Tutsis in 100 days with radio calls for total extermination.
Gaza: War vs Hamas after its Oct 7 attack. ~73k deaths over 3 years in dense urban combat (pop still ~2.1M). Official aim is destroy Hamas capability, not Palestinians; warnings issued, aid enters. No equivalent intent or method.
Oggi a Oslo con il Primo Ministro Jonas Gahr Støre.
Perché la Norvegia conta per l'Italia? Perché con le crisi in Medio Oriente e le tensioni su Hormuz e sul Mar Rosso, avere partner energetici stabili e affidabili significa più sicurezza per le famiglie e per le imprese.
Ma non solo energia. Abbiamo lavorato per rafforzare la collaborazione nella cantieristica, dove lavoratori italiani e norvegesi costruiscono già insieme, nella difesa, nello spazio e nelle materie prime critiche, indispensabili per le tecnologie che usiamo ogni giorno.
Più collaborazione tra Nazioni amiche vuol dire filiere più sicure, nuove opportunità per le nostre aziende e posti di lavoro di qualità.
Abbiamo costruito molto insieme. Possiamo fare ancora di più 🇮🇹🇳🇴
@dorso10@JollaHQ@NokiamobBlog@theoriginal086 I'm awaiting my order. How is the speed of the phone, I've had Sony 10 iii and that one was ok. Much better than the JollaC. Hoping to use this phone as a companion.
The land of engineers vs the land of managers
There is a fundamental difference between a society that is organized around making things and one organized around managing people who make things.
The engineer lives under the tyranny of reality.
You cannot negotiate with gravity.
A reactor either works or it doesn’t.
A bridge either stands or falls.
The manager operates in a different universe – one of meetings, incentives, credentials, narratives, alliances and permissions.
And here is the paradox:
Engineers create the wealth. Managers often end up controlling it.
Why?
Because the engineer is busy solving the problem.
The manager is busy understanding the organization – and scheming…
Give the second enough time and the people who build the machine eventually find themselves reporting to people whose principal skill is talking and building nothing.
You could see this transformation in the 1990s. The vocabulary itself was revealing: suddenly technical competence was not enough. You needed "communication," "stakeholder management," "networking."
None of these things is inherently bad.
But once the ability to navigate the system becomes more valuable than the ability to produce the result, the system begins selecting for a very different kind of person.
And this is where the political connection becomes interesting.
Capitalism needs engineers.
Socialism needs managers.
Capitalism ultimately asks:
What can you produce that someone values enough to pay for?
A managerial-bureaucratic system asks:
Can you obtain the permission, budget, position or institutional support to make it happen?
The first rewards competence because reality is the judge.
The second rewards proximity to power because the institution is the judge.
This may help explain one of the great transformations of post-war France: the relative rise of administrative and business elites alongside the gradual weakening of the country’s extraordinary engineering and industrial culture.
France did not suddenly become less intelligent.
It increasingly rewarded a different kind of intelligence.
The people who build things and the people who run the system are not the same people.
And when the second group becomes dominant, something profound happens:
The civilization stops asking "Does it work?"
It starts asking "Is it approved?"
That is the moment when the land of engineers becomes the land of managers.
And eventually, the managers start managing the decline.
از درگذشت اعلیحضرت هارالد پنجم، پادشاه نروژ، عمیقاً متأثر و اندوهگین شدم.
پادشاه هارالد بیش از سه دهه با احساس مسئولیتی عمیق، وقار و تعهدی خدشهناپذیر به مردم نروژ و به کشور خود خدمت کرد. او چه در لحظات شادی و جشن و چه در روزهای اندوه عمیق ملی، حضوری پایدار و وحدتبخش داشت و نمادی از تداوم و خدمتگزاری به ملت بود.
مراتب تسلیت صمیمانه خود را به اعلیحضرت هاکون هشتم، علیاحضرت ملکه سونیا، خانواده پادشاهی و مردم نروژ که در سوگ پادشاه محبوب خود نشستهاند، ابراز میدارم.
مِهر، انساندوستی و یک عمر خدمت پادشاه هارالد به ملت خود، میراثی ماندگار از او به یادگار خواهد گذاشت. نام و یاد او برای نسلهای آینده گرامی خواهد بود.
رضا پهلوی
President Zelensky warned, after over 40,000 protesters were massacred in Iran, that when the world stands aside it sends a dangerous message to every totalitarian regime: “kill enough people and you stay in power.”
@Ed_Miliband@andyburnham, solidarity with those fighting totalitarianism should not stop at Europe’s borders. Iran’s democratic movement deserves the same moral support as the people of Ukraine.
Sunlight at Earth's surface has surged since the 1980s.
Germany's Potsdam station shows 15 more W/m² of solar energy reaching the ground than during the 1970s dimming era.
The Netherlands, Switzerland and Japan all show the same trend. Austria shows even more: 23 extra W/m².
It's called 'global brightening.' As air pollution dropped, the atmosphere cleared and sunlight flooded back in.
That increase in surface radiation is 10 times larger than the forcing from CO2 over the same period.
In short: the air got cleaner, the sunlight stronger and the land a little warmer. The data say so, the physics say so, it's only the narrative that doesn't.
“Ayaan Hirsi Ali Gets Confronted on Islamophobia - Her Answer Takes the
Debate in a Completely Different Direction”
Student : You speak of Islamophobia and classes like Black Studies as phony,
ideologically driven things. But what makes white supremacy or Islamophobia different from antisemitism?
America imported millions of African slaves, Native Americans faced forced marches and genocide, and Muslims are being massacred in China today.
So what makes antisemitism so different?
Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Two things.
First, America and Western Europe have reckoned with their past.
We had slavery, we fought a war and ended it. We had segregation, we fought another major battle and ended it. We had the Civil Rights Movement.
And the people leading many of those emancipation movements were Christians inspired by the Bible.
Second, antisemitism is the oldest hatred in humanity, and you find it across the entire world.
What made the West different was that after nearly exterminating its Jewish population, it looked honestly in the mirror and confronted what it had done.
Islamophobia is a made-up word.
It's been created by a political movement that wants to exploit Western guilt to achieve its ultimate goal: the revival of the caliphate.
And the goal of that movement is to convert people to Islam whether they want to or not.
Those who refuse, she says, could face violence.
That's part of what I mean by subversion, active measures and asymmetric warfare.
The Islamists have become incredibly successful against nations with enormous military and economic power.
Islam is spreading.
They've regained Afghanistan. They have Iraq. They have Syria.
And Muslim governments themselves are afraid of what the Islamist movement could do to them.
They're exploiting principles like freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of association.
We need to understand that and find a way to preserve our principles while beating the Islamists at their own game.
Student : Is there room for compromise between principles?
Ayaan Hirsi Ali: If I want to kill you and behead you unless you convert to the religion I dictate, what would be the place of compromise?
Student : I wouldn't mind converting, since I'm agnostic, but I understand some people wouldn't share that vision...
Coleman Hughes breaks down Sowell’s most important idea:
There are two ways of seeing human nature.
The utopian vision says people are basically good. When they loot, kill, or destroy, something external must have corrupted them.
The tragic vision says the opposite: most people are self-interested. They will always put family and personal interest first. You can’t wish that away.
The only workable solution is systems (like markets) that turn self-interest into something productive for everyone else.
Ironically, the vision that sounds nicest produces the worst results. The one that accepts human limits produces the best ones we can actually get.
Angela Rayner must explain why her government department has deleted all responses to the Working Group tasked with drafting the official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility”.
The Free Speech Union exposed that all five members of the group had troubling links to Islamist groups.
This definition has revived Britain’s blasphemy laws via the back door for Islam alone. It is already having a chilling effect on free speech.
The public deserves to know why these responses were deleted.
Giovanni Falcone spent years trying to understand why nobody could break the Sicilian Mafia. Eventually he worked it out. They were looking at it wrong.
They treated every town, every family and every crime separately. What Falcone saw was the association that connected them. The divided territory. The silence. The punishment of those who broke it. The patronage. And the insulation of the men at the top.
Once he saw the system, everything else made sense.
I have spent eight years investigating what happened in Greater Manchester.
Today I am publishing the article I never expected to write. Because when I put the structure of Labour power in Greater Manchester beside the structure Falcone identified, I found the same five mechanisms staring back at me.
And at the centre of that political system for nine years sat Andy Burnham. He is now the Prime Minister.
Link to my latest here;
https://t.co/hFryzg6dlm
Do not read this as another article about grooming gangs. Read it as an article about how power protects itself. Then look at who now runs the country.
Raja Miah MBE
__________
Just 10 more paid subscribers takes us to 1,000.
If you’ve been waiting for the moment to join us, this is it. Help today be the day. Support me with anything from £3 a month, £30 for the year (or more if you can afford it) and help me fight back.
👉 https://t.co/mZBZnScays
You now know the truth of what we face. As you also know the price those of us pay that stand up to them.
Thank you for having the courage to fight alongside me.
Raja 🙏
The real GOAT.
Ludwig von Mises rebuilt economics from the foundation up, and a comparison to Einstein is not flattery: it is a structural observation about what each man did to his field.
Einstein rewrote physics by showing that measurements of space and time depended on the observer's frame of reference. Mises did something comparably radical in 1912 with The Theory of Money and Credit, then again in 1920 with the socialist calculation paper, and definitively in 1949 with Human Action: he showed that economic calculation is impossible without private property in capital goods, because prices emerge only from voluntary exchange. The Soviet planners in Moscow were not making policy errors you could fix with better data. They were attempting something logically incoherent, the way you cannot find a square root of a color. Stalin murdered millions chasing a mathematical phantom that Mises proved impossible before the Soviet state was even ten years old.
What separates Mises from most geniuses is the range. Einstein worked physics. Mises worked epistemology, monetary theory, capital theory, business cycle theory, and political philosophy simultaneously, weaving them into a single coherent system. His 1922 book Socialism predicted the collapse of every centrally planned economy with the precision of a structural engineer predicting which wall bears load. The Berlin Wall fell in 1989. The Soviet Union dissolved in 1991. The math was settled in 1922.
The state, being an institution that lives by compulsion rather than consent, cannot tolerate this kind of clarity. Governments fund universities. Universities employ economists. Those economists publish papers justifying central banking, redistribution, and regulation, because tenure flows toward conclusions that flatter power. Mises spent years teaching in Vienna without a paid university position, funding himself through the Chamber of Commerce. He was excluded not because he was wrong, but because clarity about power's limits threatens the institutions that distribute tenure.
You want to rank intellectual giants; let's rank them by what they overturned and what they built in its place. Mises overturned classical economics, demolished the theoretical case for socialism, and constructed a complete science of human choice on aprioristic foundations. Einstein, asked about Mises by journalist Henry Hazlitt in the 1940s, expressed genuine admiration. The greatest physicist of the 20th century respected the greatest economist. The tenured mediocrities who ignored Mises respected neither.
Za każdym razem gdy wracam do tego wywiadu, ciary mnie przechodzą.
Kapitan policji w Milwaukee, Edward Flynn, skończył przesłuchanie przed cywilną komisją nadzorującą pracę jego departamentu, gdzie musiał tłumaczyć się z używania przemocy wobec czarnych. Podczas spotkania dostał cynk o strzelaninie, w której zginęła biała dziewczynka, Laylah Petersen. Zabójcami byli oczywiście murzyni. Jedna z reporterek spytała go, czy jest świadomy, że gapił się w telefon i nie okazywał należytego szacunku ludziom na sali. W tym momencie w człowieku coś pękło:
"Owszem, wisiałem na telefonie. Śledziłem postępy śledztwa w sprawie 5-letniej dziewczynki, postrzelonej w głowę z przejeżdżającego samochodu, kiedy siedziała na kolanach ojca! Gdyby moi krytycy nie mieli tak bardzo w dupie, co dzieje się w ich dzielnicy, traktowałbym ich uwagi poważniej. Cała okolica jest narażona na niebezpieczeństwo nie dlatego, że mężczyźni i kobiety w mundurach codziennie ryzykują własnym życiem, aby ją chronić, ale dlatego, że mamy na ulicach ogromną liczbę dobrze uzbrojonych, bezwzględnych morderców, których nie obchodzi, do kogo strzelają. Zaraz jadę na takie miejsce zbrodni. Odbieram to osobiście. Jadę na miejsce z brodni z martwym dzieckiem."