Word is Full Reciprocity
Man is the symbol, π. The symbol includes the icon and the index.
The soul of the symbol is word, namely, free speech empiricism.
Although man-word is generative, woman and child are necessary and like man fully coherent only as man-word determined identities.
No coincidence that Christ/Jesus-paradox requires only that one believe in Him.
Except that man-word is no spirit-mysticism but iconic reality
Point-i does not call "human" institutions a farce.
Man-institutions explicitly as the Pharmakon define themselves as farce by defining themselves as "human," i.e., incomplete or fallen
It is primordial feminism, the universalization of the error that language is incomplete.
For more than 20 years,
since ~2003 I opposed the inconsistencies of the normal concept existence as 0-base for extensively denying that every [conceptual] thing is in terms of words, so I tried the also wrong language of not existing at all.
The answer is man-word as 0-base.
For many years I said that we do not exist at all.
Now I say that existence is not most fundamental and that the normal concept existence is wrong.
The most fundamental thing in that it is what everything is without inside, outside or remainder is man-word, the man-word manifold.
Man-word demonization started at the beginning of language when it became clear to man that woman could not think recursively the way man does.
His construct of animism, religion, psychology and AGI to infantilize himself relative to it to captivate woman is fatalistic genocide.
Thus indeed if the phallus in no-improper-way (iconic, proper or negentropic) would stand as it should as the iconic symbol for the thing (man-word), the thing that everything is, it would be the end of all violence and war.
Instead PF's undermining of it gets projected into it.
Just as I do not reject the word-concept (thing) existence I do not reject the word-concept FEELING.
What I am saying is that the current normal concept of feeling or experiencing is dead wrong.
It is not fundamental (the thing that everything is).
Only man-word is the thing.
Just as I do not reject the word-concept (thing) existence I do not reject the word-concept FEELING.
What I am saying is that the current normal concept of feeling or experiencing is dead wrong.
It is not fundamental (the thing that everything is).
Only man-word is the thing.
For many years I said that we do not exist at all.
Now I say that existence is not most fundamental and that the normal concept existence is wrong.
The most fundamental thing in that it is what everything is without inside, outside or remainder is man-word, the man-word manifold.
Mysticism (animism, religion, psychology and agi) is the denial of man-word that is the decoherence of all reality that we are now ultimately experiencing.
All men must refute it to declare that Y-chromosomal self-similarity and the linguistic recursion of all things are reality.
@multiplanet1 We can't let mystical bullshit paint a picture of our conceptual reality as a vastly incomplete flatland unless unknowable beings or things from beyond it empower it.
So, please do not stick to the bullshit flung about Elon Musk alone.
To some extent all men are in that position.
It started off by answering the question what point-i of https://t.co/VzGJ4Nt8O8 is as follows:
https://t.co/hmxnHf6Xuf is a fringe, unorthodox philosophical website utilizing PMWiki to host a dense, nihilistic theory centered on extreme linguistic nominalism, radical anti-realism, and the "Point-i Manifold" concept. The site, which acts as a repository for the "Universal Point-Derivative Calculus" framework, positions all existence as a "man-word" construct and frequently critiques human institutions as a "Farce". For more information, visit https://t.co/hmxnHf6Xuf
@america The Save America Act should win on its own merit.
So should every other issue. No more clumping them together without knowing what you're voting for.