Andrew
Let me offer advice.
Experienced investigators pay close attention not only to what a person says, but to what they avoid, what provokes disproportionate anger, and where they repeatedly try to redirect attention.
When someone confronted with factual questions responds by attacking the questioner’s character, motives, sanity and reputation, that behavior does not make the questions disappear. It makes investigators more interested in why those questions produce such an extreme reaction.
Your response is not the language of a man calmly confident that the evidence supports him. It is the language of someone desperate to control the frame: Charlie’s death must be discussed only on your terms, Tyler Robinson must be accepted as the killer, alternative explanations must be ridiculed rather than examined, and anyone who refuses to comply must be publicly destroyed.
That is not a rebuttal. It is containment.
Candace has been conducting what every genuine investigation requires: collecting testimony, crowdsourcing information, following leads, testing theories and discarding those that fail. Some leads will inevitably reach dead ends. That is not proof of dishonesty; it is the nature of investigation. What matters is whether substantial questions remain unanswered—and they do.
Yet instead of answering those questions with evidence, you substitute moral outrage, mockery and character assassination. You invoke Charlie, Erika and the children as emotional shields, as though grief grants you exclusive authority over the facts or makes scrutiny immoral. It does not.
You claim Candace lacks proof while demanding that everyone accept Tyler Robinson’s guilt despite evidence that remains weak, contested and inconclusive. You therefore apply one standard to Candace and another to the official narrative: absolute proof is required before she may ask questions, but certainty is demanded from the public before the case itself has established it.
That contradiction is becoming impossible to miss.
So here is the advice an experienced interrogator might give you: stop attacking the person asking the questions and start answering the questions themselves. Stop repeating certainty where certainty has not been earned. Stop behaving as though investigation is a threat.
Because every time you respond to evidence with sarcasm or moral outrage, to questions with insults, and to uncertainty with enforced certainty, you do not make Candace look less credible.
You make yourself look more concerned about where the investigation may lead.
@RealCandaceO@baroncoleman@JohnMappin@ImMappin@joekent16jan19@TRobinsonNewEra@LionelMedia@IanCarrollShow@AwakenWithJP@jimmy_dore@OwenBenjamin@leahfiles@realstewpeters@EstulinVz@RealAlexJones@HarrisonHSmith@BlakeSNeff@TPUSA@DonaldJTrumpJr
#TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #TPUSA #Israel
The Left just blew all their trust.
Normies see a nice guy doing a simple debate, not a political speech, not leading a rally or a riot, getting gunned down in 4k.
Then they see a bunch of people, even their friends, cheer and clap and dance. They ask why.
"Well, you see, he was evil!" they cry gleefully, eyes feral.
The normie just stares a the screen. A clean cut guy with a microphone is bleeding out horrifically. It reminds them of the scared young blonde they saw bleeding out on the subway just a few days ago. A question forms.
"What did he do that made him evil?" they ask.
"He SAID things!" they scream back, a bit of spittle flying from their mouths.
"So you are happy they murdered him....for talking?"
"YESSSS!!!! You get it now!" claps their kids teacher, their pilot, or their doctor.
The normie is horrified. Someone they trust their kids to, their health to, or their safety is acting like a foaming, raging lunatic who wants people dead because they said something they didn't like.
Do you realize how this comes across?
“I just had a thought. Why did the Lord allow us to see Charlie Kirk get murdered?”
“To see it in real life and for people to see it and react a certain way and say that they do not care reveals their true posture. It truly reveals how sick twisted and demented they are..”
She’s right!! 🙏🏼👇🏼
RFK Jr. is such a quack. You must listen to the real scientists, like the ones who made us put on a mask as we entered a restaurant, walk ten feet to a table, and then take it off as soon as we sat down.
You’re absolutely right that vaccines have saved millions of lives and represent one of the greatest achievements in modern medicine. That fact should never be dismissed or minimized. At the same time, I wonder why it’s so hard to hold both ideas in our heads at once—that vaccines have done immense good and that it’s not unreasonable to scrutinize aspects of how they’re administered today.
For example, why can’t we have a real conversation about the necessity of a Hepatitis B shot at birth for a healthy newborn? Or about whether the CDC schedule, which has grown more aggressive over the years, might deserve re-evaluation? Or about the safety of adjuvants like aluminum when injected into infants with developing immune systems?
It also seems fair to point out that most pre-licensing trials don’t use truly inert placebo controls, and very few track long-term safety outcomes. That’s not conspiracy—it’s just acknowledging a limitation in the data.
So the question I keep coming back to is: if we can recognize the undeniable success of vaccines historically, why is it treated as dangerous or taboo to raise legitimate questions about how we use them today? Why does skepticism around specific policies or practices get conflated with being “anti-vaccine,” when in reality it’s about making sure the science is as strong and transparent as possible?
Jesus was praying as He died on the cross.
If your conception of prayer is that it's like a charm that wards off bad things from happening to you, as opposed to a relational dialogue with the One who sustains you even after death, you really don't get it at all.
It is shocking to me that so many left wing politicians attack the idea of prayer in response to a tragedy.
Literally no one thinks prayer is a substitute for action.
We pray because our hearts are broken and we believe that God is listening.
Let's get something straight before the Epstein lists drop:
Adults do not have "sex" with children. They are child rapists.
Adults do not touch children sexually. They are child molesters.
Adults do not beat up children.
They are child abusers.
Adults do not transport kids for sex.
They are child sex traffickers.
Adults do not take the lives of kids.
They are child murderers.
------------------------------
Do not down play what these monsters are doing to these kids!
If Democrats are on the Epstein list… lock them up and throw away the key.
If Republicans are on the Epstein list… lock them up and throw away the key.
Agree?
The closer you get to Christ the more sinful you are going to feel. Everyone who has seen God becomes acutely aware of their own sin. If you think you are without sin or you’re “good enough” you don’t know Christ and you need to fix that, today.
Ladies, feminism is dying.
You’re free to be feminine again.
Find a husband to take care of you, have lots of babies, go to church together, homeschool your kids, decorate your home, wear dresses, take naps, go on play dates, & bake for your family.
It’s okay now, you’re free.