TS O'Rama

connoisseur of fine weather

[TS O'Rama @tsorama]

Part of the fascination with the Kirk case is that it stands as proxy of so many other questions, like the integrity & trustworthiness of this admin, the sway of Israel, the testing of the legitimacy of alt media, and the discernment of Christian influencers.

[Eric Weinstein @ericweinstein]

Yeah…nah.

Here’s what I think is happening instead.

I haven’t wanted to say this, but there is a problem with organized Skepticism even more than conspiracy theories. My claim is that from hard evidence NOT ONE of the following is an extraordinary claim:

The CIA not only gathers intelligence but kills people, violates rights, gaslights and evades scrutiny and oversight.

The U.S. hides bioweapons programs.

The U.S. engages in regime change through charity and aid programs.

We in the U.S. medically experiment on our own citizens without consent.

We run drugs.

The DOJ and FBI are actively and flagrantly obstructing justice.

Putin easily kills people outside Russia.

We conspire and use academics for sheepskin washing our dirty work.

U.S. newspapers actively avoid reporting stories about which the U.S. population is desperate for information. They also carry extremely non neutral biases.

We actively conspired to hide open and obvious presidential dementia. And by extension, there are massive conspiracies at every level below that one. At a mind boggling level.

There are Special Access programs that are about real and/or fake NHI/UFOs

Etc.

————

The last thing we need is skeptics telling us the bar for such conspiracies and/or governmental accountability requires extraordinary evidence.

Somehow the skeptics have it totally wrong.

After Watergate, Iran-Contra, COVID, Church/Pike committees, etc. these are no longer extraordinary claims to raise. They are ordinary claims.

I have no idea whether Lindsay Graham died of natural causes. But I can tell you the difference between a skeptic and a scientist looking at the claim.

A skeptic’s first move is to lurch for the budding conspiracy and try to pull the idea of foul play off the table first and then to require a mountain of evidence to consider such a thing.

A scientist firmly grabs the skeptic’s hand and forces him to put the hypothesis back on the table and says “Uh, you’re not in charge here. There’s a history…and I’m going to need to see something other than reference to null hypotheses, William of Occam and Carl Sagan…because that’s not how science and investigation works.”

Time for extra scientific skepticism to die I think. Covert operations and conspiracies are difficult enough to document as it is.

We don’t need skeptics as self appointed referees.

[TS O'Rama @tsorama]

@tommasomar @EricRSammons Vance wasn't nominated yet at that point.

[TS O'Rama @tsorama]

@EricRSammons Internet "personalities" are not the problem. A completely untrustworthy FBI and federal government that lies and hides is. But I get that it's easier to attack symptoms & not the root.

[The Constitutionalist 🇺🇸 @WeWillBeFree24]

I told you months ago Ohio was going to dump data center waste water, into our waterways. Meta already dumped a potentially deadly bacteria into the sewage system.

↓

Apparently, everyone thought I was being untruthful until Ohio MSM published it today. ↓

Meet Ohio's EPA Director, John Logue.
John was appointed by Mike DeWine in April 2025. Logue's environmental experience: NONE.

John Logue was the Administrator and CEO of Ohio Bureau of Workman's Compensation. No environmental experience, or education.

Under Logue, the Ohio EPA has proposed a new general permit that would allow data centers to discharge their wastewater and "OTHER WATERS" directly into state waterways, including Lake Erie and the Ohio River.

This proposal is to fast-track data center construction by simplifying the permitting process for their massive water discharge needs.

What's in the water?

Biocides, corrosion inhibitors, phosphates, antifreeze, heavy metals, pfas plastics, and thermal pollution for super heated water disrupting the O2 in the ecosystems causing die off.

Logue claims he's under public and federal pressure, and claims the move "cuts red tape" for business, environmental groups and some federal frameworks.

Innocent enough? No.

Since 2021, Logue has been engaged with OhioX.

'OhioX is a statewide nonpartisan and nonprofit technology and innovation partnership. We advocate for growth on behalf of Ohio technology and innovation. Our diverse membership includes leading Fortune 500 companies, growing startups, leading universities and research institutions, and technology-focused businesses.'

This is Trump's plan. How many times have you heard Vivek say "cut the red tape?"

[Bernie Moreno @berniemoreno]

This is absolutely unacceptable and will not be tolerated. Data centers should be held to the same, or higher, environmental standards as any other business.

This nonsense needs to end, as do the dumb tax incentives, and all data centers should never raise electricity costs!

[TS O'Rama @tsorama]

All the world's a stage.

[Shell Coach @ShellCoach77]

@NJBeisner Benny Johnson was asked to be there by Erika.
No reason for that.

[theleahfiles @leahfiles]

Let's expose the fraud playbook TPUSA's structure follows, one person at a time.
First up, Tyler Bowyer.

Fraud within organizations, especially when dealing with executives, is more often than not, structural. The goal isn't to steal a lump sum, it's to build a system where money moves constantly among related entities so that no single document ever shows the whole picture, insider pay is relabeled as arm's-length business expense, and the ultimate recipient is hidden behind a layer. You don't write yourself a check. You'd design exactly what I have been seeing across all TPUSA entities.

Here's what Tyler Bowyer's playbook looks like:

1. On his own charity's return, Bowyer is the Chief Operating Officer AND its #1 outside “vendor”. $288,255 for “COO SERVICES,” invoiced from his house.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: a salary gets audited and a vendor invoice doesn't. Executive pay triggers board sign-off, comparability studies, reasonableness tests, an excise tax. A “purchased service” melts into the expense pile. So you stop being an employee getting paid and start being a company getting hired by yourself. Billing it from your house is the tell: there's no firm on the other end. It's you, writing invoices to a charity you run....

2. His pay is split across three entities. $288K from the charity, $88K from the political arm, $0 from TPUSA. Total: ~$376K.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: everyone who might catch you pulls one filing at a time. Put the whole number on one return and it draws the excess-comp tax and the headline. Slice it across three affiliates and each piece looks modest. You're not hiding the money, you're hiding the total, and betting nobody cross-references three separate 990s. They usually don't, which is why it's one of the first things I do.

3. His public role is politics, he's COO of Turning Point Action, the (c)(4) political arm. Yet the tax-deductible (c)(3) charity pays him roughly three times what the political arm does.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: charity money is the cheapest money in the building. It's tax-deductible, so it's easier to raise and comes in bigger amounts. If a person's real work is political and you load that salary onto the charity, you're paying for work the charity is legally barred from doing, with subsidized dollars, and the donors wrote off politics on their taxes without knowing it. You push every cost onto the entity with the cheapest money and the least scrutiny for that line. Whether this split reflects real charitable work or a misallocation is exactly what an audit would settle, and it's the first thing I'd pull his time records for.

4. The charity paying him takes 100% of its money as grants from TPUSA, spends nearly all of it, and holds nothing. In its 2023 return it booked $3.7 million in salaries against zero employees on its federal wage form. The next year it reported 124.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: a satellite entity is a second set of books you fully control. Money leaves the closely-watched flagship as a "grant", which looks charitable, lands in a smaller entity nobody audits hard, and gets spent there on payroll and insiders with a fraction of the oversight. And millions in salaries booked against zero reported employees is the classic ghost-employee signature, wages to people who may not exist, or to insiders dressed as staff. Maybe 2023 was a filing error. That's the innocent read. But a swing from zero to 124 is the exact anomaly a forensic examiner reconciles first, because it's also how payroll fraud hides.

5. Within a few months of Charlie Kirk's assassination, as control of a nine-figure network changed hands, Tyler Bowyer opened five companies all within 54 days of one another. Four are anonymous Wyoming LLCs using one Cheyenne "mailbox". One is named “Vote LLC.” One is “Tyler Bowyer Inc.,” at the same address he already invoices the charity from.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: the entire purpose of an anonymous LLC is that no one can prove YOU got paid. Send money to “Victory Advisors LLC” and the trail dead-ends at a mail drop. Stand up a personal corporation at your billing address and your fees now flow through a company with one more wall between the cash and your name. And you build the pipes before the money moves, right when the org is in transition and everyone's looking at the funeral instead of the filings.

6. He co-owns Resolute Media, run out of a building on the charity's campus, and chairs Superfeed, the for-profit the movement pays, with Erika Kirk's own mother on the board.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: self-dealing is invisible when the counterparty wears a different name. You don't embezzle from the nonprofit, you sell to it, at your price, through a company you own. The charity pays “Superfeed” or “Resolute,” it reads as a normal vendor, and the profit lands with the same people who run the charity.

7. On their signed federal returns, TPUSA and Turning Point Action both answered "No" to the question regulators scan for self-dealing: any business transactions with an officer, or with a company an officer controls.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: that box is the one you most need blank, because a "yes" invites the audit you're avoiding. And here's the defense they'll reach for, so let me get ahead of it. They'll say the "No" is technically correct: officer pay gets reported elsewhere, and this schedule only captures a company an officer owns more than 35% of. Fine. But that's exactly the problem. Those thresholds are the exits. Officer comp is excluded. A 34% stake is excluded. So a person can be paid by the charity, own a slice of the vendors it hires, and chair a company it does business with, and still, truthfully, check "No." The schedule built to expose insider dealing has doors an insider can walk right through. A "No" here doesn't mean there's nothing to see. It means the only way to see it is the one thing they haven't handed over: the ownership percentages and the payment records. That, again, is the audit.

The pattern: Every one of these findings align to what someone committing fraud would do and reveals a behavioral pattern: to make the money harder to see, the recipient harder to name, and the total harder to add up. Real fraud isn't loud. It's a hundred small, individually-defensible decisions that all lean the same way, toward the insiders and away from the light. One of these could be considered a "quirk", but all seven, across every entity, for years, it is a design.

I can't prove intent from a tax form. Intent lives in the bank records and the operating agreements, and those aren't public. But every structural choice here is the one a person with something to hide would make. That is the reason to open the books.

Tyler Bowyer (and all of TPUSA, but I'll get there in the following parts) needs a real forensic audit, by the IRS, by the Arizona AG, by anyone with the subpoena power to pull what a 990 will never show you.

They built the structure betting nobody would read the filings or pay attention. I'm paying attention.

Part 2 coming next. Who do you want? Erika Kirk or Andrew Kolvet?

[TS O'Rama @tsorama]

Interesting that Matt Walsh, unlike the rest of the clan, hasn't said anything on the trial. No "overwhelming evidence" lie.

[🏛Architectolder @Architectolder]

@LeadingReport I called it from Day one. Raffensperger knew it

[TS O'Rama @tsorama]

@RealCandaceO @baroncoleman Kind of interesting: Trump in Aug '25: “I want to try and get to heaven if possible.” Oct '25: “I don’t think there’s anything that's going to get me in heaven. Okay? I think I’m not maybe heaven-bound.” What changed?

[TS O'Rama @tsorama]

@RenzTom On brand for a banana republic.

[TS O'Rama @tsorama]

In fairness, our elites know there is nothing to being a senator beyond collecting bribes.

[Cuckturd @CattardSlim]

Making Lindsey Graham's sister a U.S Senator is crazy.

Remind us about DEI, nepotism, & meritocracy again.

[TS O'Rama @tsorama]

@CBSNews Fitting enough, since being a senator involves no skill beyond collecting bribes.

[TS O'Rama @tsorama]

@leahfiles Banana republic to the max, but everybody knows the only skill in being a senator is collecting bribes.

[TS O'Rama @tsorama]

@JonnyRoot_ Proof that God hates DEI.

[Wall Street Mav @WallStreetMav]

The first call for the first female umpire in MLB history went exactly as you would expect.

[TS O'Rama @tsorama]

@ElofsonJess He spoke about Charlie when he had to. He spoke about Ashli Babbitt more consistently and she was obviously not nearly as important as Kirk.

[Fr Thomas Crean OP @crean_fr]

The creator of the very useful Douay-Rheims website is in need of help:
https://t.co/CXIATPPZ03

[TS O'Rama @tsorama]

@JonHusted @berniemoreno

[theleahfiles @leahfiles]

The Senate cannot confirm Todd Blanche on Wednesday, because Todd Blanche is actively covering up the Epstein files.

Thirty miles south of Santa Fe there are 10,000 acres called Zorro Ranch. Jeffrey Epstein owned it for a quarter century. Survivors say girls were flown there and abused there. There was a tip about girls buried in the hills, disturbing enough that the state searched with cadaver dogs this spring.

In all those years, no law enforcement agency ever searched that ranch. Not once. In 2019 the FBI raided Epstein's Manhattan townhouse and his island the week of his arrest. The ranch? Never. And when New Mexico's attorney general built his own case that year, with victim statements and suspects beyond Epstein and Maxwell, federal prosecutors called and told him to stand down. They promised to share their evidence for state charges later. His words, on the record: "I don't think that they were forthright, and I don't think that they were operating in good faith." Epstein died and the case of Zorro Ranch died with him.

This February, New Mexico tried again. A new attorney general, Raul Torrez, reopened the case: the only active criminal investigation into Zorro Ranch anywhere on earth. In March his investigators became the first law enforcement officers to ever search the property. To charge anyone still living, he needs one thing from Washington: the unredacted files. The names of victims, witnesses, and co-conspirators that are blacked out in the public release.

He asked on February 13. He asked again. And again. Five times, plus a formal legal letter, plus an attempted meeting in Washington. On June 30 he sent a letter addressed to Todd Blanche, by name: 130+ days of silence. The delay is "unreasonable under any rule of reason." And this sentence, which should be read aloud at Wednesday's hearing: "Every avenue of investigation that begins with a redacted name, a blacked-out face or an obscured date is an avenue that ends before it begins." Statutes of limitation are dying while the files sit in a building in Washington.

The man that letter is addressed to is Todd Blanche, the acting Attorney General of the United States.

Before he ran the Justice Department, Todd Blanche had exactly one job: personal criminal defense lawyer to Donald Trump. Trump's PAC paid his firm nearly $10,000,000. Trump appears in more than 5,300 of the released Epstein documents. The Justice Department's own ethics chief told Blanche, in writing, in his first two weeks, to recuse himself from his former client's matters. He refused. Then he took personal control of everything Epstein.

Personal control looks like this. He flew to Florida and spent nine private hours with Ghislaine Maxwell, the only living witness who knows everything. She came out announcing Trump did nothing wrong. A week later she was moved to a minimum-security camp that Bureau of Prisons policy says sex offenders can't be in. Under oath, Blanche described it as "low-security to low-security." That is false on the Bureau's own records. She has made it public that she'll "speak fully and honestly" if she gets clemency. Think about that...

Personal control looks like this. When a 2015 DEA memo surfaced in the files tying Epstein and 14 redacted names to drug and prostitution money, about $50 million in flagged wire transfers, a senator demanded the unredacted version. The DEA administrator was ready to hand it over. Senator Wyden says Blanche personally stopped him. Blanche's response was to call a sitting senator a fabricator. The memo is still sealed today. And the 43-year-old task force that wrote it, the one that caught El Chapo? Blanche shut the whole thing down.

Personal control looks like this. His department withheld FBI interviews of a woman whose abuse allegation mentioned Trump, and quietly deleted one from the public database after release. It came back only when reporters caught it. He certified to Congress, in writing, that nothing was withheld for political reasons. A federal judge has now ruled, in the government's own words, that "the Attorney General has conceded that he is in violation of the Act." Blanche's answer to the unsealing order was to refuse and ask for 60 more days. His answer to you was: "We are not sitting on a single piece of paper."

One man sits between the Epstein files and every investigation trying to open them. That man was paid ten million dollars by the most famous name in them.

And Epstein is only the first file. The deep dive covers the rest: the tax immunity he signed for Trump's family, "FOREVER BARRED," worth $600M+, that a judge is now probing as a possible fraud on the court.

The prosecution a federal judge dismissed as vindictive, finding Blanche "started the investigation to implicate" the defendant.

The bodycam of an opposition mayor arrested "per the deputy attorney general of the United States" as the cameras were ordered off.

The armed marshals at a whistleblower's door the night before her testimony.

This is a dangerous man. Not a partisan, a dangerous man: one who has proven he will point the entire machinery of American justice at protecting a single client and burying a single story, and who is days away from owning that machinery permanently.

The hearing is Wednesday, 9am. Your two senators decide. Tag them below and ask one question: "Will you confirm the man covering up the Epstein files before the Inspector General tells you whether he lied to you?"

@SenThomTillis @SenatorCollins @LisaMurkowski @JohnCornyn @SenBillCassidy @HawleyMO: you said you had concerns. This is what they look like on paper. I'll email you the full 20 page report.

Repost so no senator can say they didn't know.

[TS O'Rama @tsorama]

@thevivafrei @baroncoleman FWIW Grok takes Baron's side: https://t.co/fAtZbcXJEx