@GlobalSouthNew But there are grounds, that woman applied late but her application was one of the 3 that were considered for interview out of 73 early applications. She also met with one of the panelists days before the interview, surely something was shared in dat miting. FRAUD!
@tshepomatho@mhlatze No courts shouldn't have that power because it could be abused. People must be allowed to enjoy their freedom of choice regarding marriage regimes.
@Ben504980631783@mhlatze Our freedom of choice is being taken away but you don't see anything wrong? What else will they take away from us? Freedom of religion?
@MoriMs8754@mhlatze They are taking away our freedom of choice. You cant choose between out of community of property and in community of property anymore because the difference no longer exists.
@PodSnippetsZA@ke_kgethegile@mhlatze Why does out of community of property marriage exist in the first place if all marriages should be treated the same during divorce?
@ke_kgethegile@Tshego_Ratiba@mhlatze People must be allowed to choose the type of marriage they want to get into. Freedom of choice is being taken away under the guise of fairness and constitutionality.
@GardeeGodrich There's no different marriage regimes in South Africa anymore. These people want our kids to be raised by single moms like puppies. They are destroying marriages
@pule_jones This is a cover up. The commission has no grounds to reject the allegations because its not the commission thats being implicated in wrong doing, its just one individual who works at the commission.
@CannyMaphanga@SABCNews The commission cannot know as a fact that the allegations are false because its not the commission that's being implicated in wrong doing, it's one person who works at the commission. This is just a cover up.
@KenzieGoldberg The commission is trying so desperately to cover this thing up. They can't know for sure that Cabonge is lying. They must request an affidavit from Cabonge explaining in detail what happened. Cabonge didn't make that recording.
@MajadiboduSimon@IOL The commission is clearly covering this up. The question now is why? Cabonge implicated one person at the commission, not the whole commission. What is the commission rejecting? on what grounds? They must subpoena Cabonge to explain who that person is.