@OfficialLoganK Tell me, Logan: will you take responsibility for misleading consumers?
There has been no proper explanation, no compensation, and no accountability. Do you believe Google should face legal consequences for this?
@OfficialLoganK@hamoudi_yo After so many lies, hype cycles, and disappointed users, has Logan ever considered deleting his account and stopping the endless manipulation of his followers?
@OfficialLoganK You really should bring the open-source CLI back to users. It might give you at least some chance of staying competitive—instead of acting like your products are already good enough.
@OfficialLoganK Tell me, Logan: if AGY can use Claude, what reason is there to use Gemini at all?
Why not separate the CLI from AGY and give us an open-source platform again, like you used to?
@OfficialLoganK@RoundtableSpace Tell me, Logan: if AGY can use Claude, what reason is there to use Gemini at all?
Why not separate the CLI from AGY and give us an open-source platform again, like you used to?
@OfficialLoganK@ggg78g89 Tell me, Logan: if AGY can use Claude, what reason is there to use Gemini at all?
Why not separate the CLI from AGY and give us an open-source platform again, like you used to?
@shengzheyao I’m not a fan of Gemini CLI being folded into AGY, a closed-source platform.
So when are you going to abandon AGY too—just like you abandoned your promise to release Gemini 3.5 Pro and misled your users?
@OfficialLoganK Gemini 3.5 is nowhere to be seen, and now even your already lagging models are retreating behind closed platforms.
Are you actually trying to compete in the AI race, or have you already given up?
@OfficialLoganK Seriously, Logan?
Your company said Gemini 3.5 Pro would be released within a month. That deadline has already passed, and there's still no explanation, no update, and no transparency.
What exactly is your company doing?
@mark_k Open-source models matter. They make deployment easier, improve transparency for testing and auditing, and enable better collaboration and adaptation. If the goal is meaningful AI regulation, open-source isn't the problem—it's part of the solution.