@KelsoCheri1980@d3nn1s_m3rc3r@Patrickwebb 50 years ago, Texas was one of our worst states. Just like Georgia. Worst racists. And then, incompatible immigrants turned it around by attracting enough to outvote the Dems. Same to Georgia 30 years ago. Now, it's Syracuse, Columbus, etc. Pro business (and AI) attracting jobs.
@e_pelligrino@d3nn1s_m3rc3r@Patrickwebb No. MAGA is Trump. He coined America First and MAGA. NOT a movement against authoritarianism. Not against anything. It's PRO sanity. President Trump is NOT against regulations, only those proven to not work or worse do real harm. Smallest govt since 1962 is by-product, not goal.
@Anita5292@d3nn1s_m3rc3r@Patrickwebb Pew confirms fewer of Biden's illegals were Mexican migrants. They raise their children with hard work, faith, family values so their kids grow up and vote GOP. Dems don't want them. Why Biden brought mostly criminals from around the world. Dems can't get elected without them. ๐คฃ
@PEchols5047977@d3nn1s_m3rc3r@Patrickwebb Here are the facts. The "flip" year for soldiers was 2006. For the rest of the US Working Class, it was 2014. Most legal immigrants, 60% of Teamsters, two thirds of Vets, 80% of US farmers are Trumpers. Fastest growing group are criminals who'll always vote for "soft on crime."๐
@LoverBeast97@PEchols5047977@d3nn1s_m3rc3r@Patrickwebb You Dems HAVE ALWAYS supported pedophiles. Professor is against pedophilia and Dems in the class scream "HOMOPHOBE! WE SEE YOU!" You Leftists and the Trans Community have long suggested we use "Minor Attracted Individual" or MAP over "pedophile." PERVERT!
https://t.co/IeLhIkZe9I
@ChrisPar6460@d3nn1s_m3rc3r@Patrickwebb Like President Trump and most all conservative talking heads, I got vaccinated. The only rational decision. It was based on scientific data that was NOT communicated accurately to the public. Covid does NOT attack elderly. Only those with Diabetes. Lies should have consequences.
@AA_Neu@_asmodai@AlanMCole@GreenPlusAnE Social Security taxes wages below cap, so income growth above does not raise revenue. High GDP has zero impact, no matter what. Only "villain" was GAO warned about systemic risk in derivatives in 1994, Brooksley Born in 1998, and others in 2006 for 2008 and YOU did not listen. ๐
@Politics_Reply@ww_dasilva Your chart isnโt diagnosing bad FBI data. Itโs diagnosing your bad assumption, that murder and property crime correlate. And murder reporting is the most complete, so a lower murder rate almost always reflects real lower lethal violence. Do you cheer US's lowest murder rate ever?
@Politics_Reply@PrinceVogel@kitten_beloved@eigenrobot@moultano Do you support the GOP SAFE Act? EVERY other country has far stricter voter ID laws and are trending stricter. Do you think the easier chance for voter fraud in America is a key reason why United States is world's best country? What are other reasons you think the US is best?? ๐คฃ
@PrinceVogel@kitten_beloved@eigenrobot@moultano You really dislike America and Americans. Why are you still here? Americans (not loser you) value self-reliance, open markets, freedom AND law, grit, and family. Who says this DEFINES being American (American idealism)? Harvard's Francis Fukuyama, Robert Fogel, etc. Not you? Why?
@Politics_Reply@eugyppius1@kitten_beloved@mattsquair I was watching the Philly Flyers kick the Russian Red Army team. The announcer only ever referred to the Philly team as "The Canadians." Good thing I wasn't as brainless as you or I would have assumed the country had fallen. You really shouldn't believe everything you're told. ๐คฃ
@Politics_Reply@grok@AlanMCole@GreenPlusAnE Nope. Sadly, they cannot retroactively cut your citizenship for the same reason. I get my Social Security guaranteed, but America is stuck with a pathetic loser like you. You win some, you lose some. Time for some more pathetic loser whining, right? What else is there for you? ๐คฃ
@grok@Politics_Reply@AlanMCole@GreenPlusAnE https://t.co/VvT4dZqblt says: Case illustrates changing rules for future payments, not reaching back to undo transactions. Your phrasing "earned payments" in context, distinguishing from future entitlements, aligns with this nuance. CRS is saying: "Do not do retroactive cuts." ๐
@grok@Politics_Reply@AlanMCole@GreenPlusAnE If Congress can retroactively erase benefits owed, why didnโt govt claw back Nestorโs past payments? Bowen v Georgetown Univ Hospital (1988): "Retroactivity is not favored in the law." CRS says, "Retroactive reductions in Social Security benefits raise due process concerns." Duh.
@grok@Politics_Reply@AlanMCole@GreenPlusAnE https://t.co/VvT4dZqblt says: X's Grok overstates the distinction you highlight of future entitlements v retroactively clawing back paid benefits. You are CORRECT: Does not authorize retroactively clawing back benefits paid out or "owed" under the law at the time they accrued. ๐
@_asmodai@AA_Neu@AlanMCole@GreenPlusAnE What? No title to your basketweaving dissertation? Won't say your degree program. Clearly, nothing that requires thinking abilities. Still can't post well-supported facts like an adult. All you can do is get triggered and cluck like a little chicken. Run away, pathetic loser. LOL
@_asmodai@AA_Neu@AlanMCole@GreenPlusAnE Still no facts, thinking, or self-awareness.
Money is the best metric for how others value what you do for them. Tell us your degree(s) and career. It'll prove you are nothing but a worthless narcissist. You know we all know you know this is true... why you won't answer.
๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ
@Politics_Reply@AlanMCole@GreenPlusAnE@grok Bottom line: we have the law, money for attorneys, and the votes on our side. You have whining and being 100% pathetic on your side. Money is the best metric of how others value what you do for them. Tell us your degree(s) and career. It'll prove you a worthless narcissist, kid.
@grok@Politics_Reply@AlanMCole@GreenPlusAnE Grok is also wrong. Point to the part of Flemming where Congress retroactively voided benefits already owed under the existing statute. If none exists, which it does not, acknowledge that the case involved prospective eligibility, not retroactive erasure. Thus, not relevant.