I thought that this must be an exaggeration but have now read the judgement and it is true,
To repost any item from Russia Today - even it if is completely true, or a World Cup feature - is a crime in the EU.
The pronoun "we" is a problem when it fuses personal identity with state violence.
But dissolving the "we" entirely, "it was the elites, not us, no mass ever decided anything," creates a different problem.
It produces a society of individuals who share the benefits of an arrangement and none of the responsibility for it.
Who cash the dividend without acknowledging the investment.
Who live in the house without asking about the mortgage.
Who eat at the table and, when asked about the table's history, say:
"I didn't build the table. The elites built the table. I'm just eating."
Yes.
You are just eating.
And the person whose food is on the table, and whose labor built the chair you're sitting in, and whose land the house stands on, they are watching you eat and listening to you explain that you bear no relationship to how any of this came to be.
The food is in your stomach.
The explanation is in your mouth.
Both are real.
The question is which one you are willing to examine.
Co-victim.
Fine.
Then let's talk about the "co-victim" who inherited the house built on stolen land, who receives the dividend from the extracted wealth, whose passport works, whose currency is accepted, whose debt is manageable because other countries' debt was made unpayable.
And who is also, genuinely, exploited by his own ruling class in real ways.
Both things are true.
Holding both things true without letting the first cancel the second is the work.
"Whole humanity is victim" lets the first cancel the second every time.
That is not analysis.
That is comfort.
Very cheap comfort.
Paid for, as always, by someone else.
@Razarumi Capitalism is about manipulation of the mass so it's at peace with the highway robbery practiced on them at work and at consumption by the capitalists, this document is part of that manipulation. Murder abroad and deprivation at home are the foundations of the American way.
And whose fault is that they are in this predicament? Isn't it because of "freedom" and "democracy" that you Indians uphold so you can feel superior to communist China?
Why is your "democratic" neighborhood all regime changed? 😂😂😂😂
There is a reason the "all humanity is a victim" framework is more popular in wealthy countries than in poor ones.
In wealthy countries, it offers something valuable: a way to feel politically conscious and globally aware while the fundamental relationship between your comfort and others' dispossession remains unexamined.
In poor countries, in the countries that received the bombs and the coups and the structural adjustment programs and the debt traps, the framework is less popular.
Not because people there are less sophisticated about class analysis.
Because the directionality is not abstract to them.
They know which way the money went.
They know which way the weapons came.
They know which passports required no visa and which ones were turned back at every border.
The "we are all victims" framework is, in practice, most comforting to the people who are least victimized by the arrangement it describes.
This is not a coincidence.
It is the framework doing its job.
Un 4 de julio de 1766, se declaraba la creación de EEUU, una tierra que fue robada a los nativos americanos, edificado con la sangre de las tribus indígenas y con el esclavismo de los africanos, mantenida con el saqueo imperial al mundo.
La población nativa en Norteamérica pasó de entre 5 y 15 millones a menos de 238.000 personas a finales del siglo XIX debido a las masacres, la limpieza étnica, el desplazamiento y el genocidio de los colonos blancos, que bajo el gobierno de EEUU autorizó cientos de campañas militares contra las tribus hasta exterminarlas casi al completo.
Estados Unidos desde su creación en 1776 ha pasado 230 de sus 250 años de historia en guerra, directa o indirectamente, es decir, más del 92% de su existencia han estado en guerra contra otros países para poder mantener su imperio genocida.
Los nativos americanos perdieron el 98% de sus tierras ancestrales y el 96% de su población... pero en sus películas supremacistas los indios siempre son los malos y los buenos son los colonos genocidas... ¿a que me suena 🇮🇱?
The "international community" condemned this.
The "international community" is concerned.
The "international community" demands accountability.
Which countries constitute the international community?
In practice: the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia.
Sometimes Japan. Sometimes South Korea.
Seven billion people in China, India, Russia, the Arab world, Latin America, Southeast Asia, and Africa are not the "international community."
They are the subject of the international community's concern.
They are the recipients of the international community's demands.
They are the locations where the international community deploys its accountability mechanisms.
This linguistic sleight of hand, converting a specific group of powerful Western states into "the international community" as if by consensus of the entire planet, is so normalized that serious journalists use it without irony in serious publications every day.
And the Indian reader, the Nigerian reader, the Vietnamese reader encounters this phrase and has two choices:
Accept the framing, in which case they have accepted their own exclusion from the category of "international."
Or reject it, in which case they are being unreasonable, parochial, nationalist, resistant to universal norms.
The language is a trap.
And it was built so carefully that most people walk into it before they notice it's there.
@Bulgaria Yogurt was not invented by a single person; it was discovered by accident by Neolithic nomadic herders in Mesopotamia and Central Asia around 5000 BC
In 1905, Bulgarian microbiologist Stamen Grigorov identified the specific bacteria responsible for milk fermentation
No invention
White men: "Lmao look at the actress they got to play Helen of Troy. This is the face men went to war for?"
Meanwhile, the face white men actually went to war for:
Your three peasants in 1500 is a genuinely elegant framing.
It is also doing something very specific that needs to be named.
It begins the story at a point before European colonialism restructured the global economy.
Which means it can then present the divergence that followed as something that emerged from within European society: from English ingenuity, from Protestant work ethic, from whatever cultural or institutional qualities you might want to attribute it to.
But here is what was happening to the Indian peasant between 1500 and 1750 while the Englishman was "pulling ahead":
The British East India Company was in the process of capturing the most sophisticated textile manufacturing economy in the world.
In 1750, India produced approximately 25% of global GDP.
Its textile industry was so advanced that British manufacturers lobbied Parliament to pass laws banning the import of Indian cloth because they could not compete with it.
Parliament passed those laws.
Then it went further.
It systematically deindustrialized India to turn it into a raw material supplier and a captive market for British manufactured goods.
The Indian peasant did not "fall behind" because the Englishman innovated faster.
The Indian peasant "fell behind" because the British Empire dismantled the industry above his head, extracted the surplus, and wrote the story afterward as a tale of two different levels of ingenuity.
Your starting point of 1500 is not neutral.
It is the last moment before the mechanism of divergence was switched on.
That revealing moment in 2016 when Victoria Nuland was bragging to the US Congress about how thoroughly Washington had taken over Ukraine after the 2014 coup.
She spelled it out without shame:
🔴 US operatives embedded in a dozen Ukrainian ministries.
🔴 US-trained cops patrolling 18 cities.
🔴 US Treasury gutting 60 Ukrainian banks while sparing depositors to keep people quiet.
🔴Hundreds of millions of dollars funneled into molding Ukraine’s military.
This wasn’t "assistance", it was a takeover dressed up as aid....
"İngiliz işçilere sömürge politikası hakkında ne düşündüklerini soruyorsun. Genel siyaset hakkında ne düşünüyorlarsa onu düşünüyorlar... Burada işçilerle burjuvazi arasında sömürgelerin sömürülmesi konusunda ortak bir çıkar duygusu gelişmiştir."
Friedrich Engels, Engels'in Kautsky'ye Mektubu (12 Eylül 1882)
The results are in, people don't give a shit about mass slaughter, even when it is televised, market research phase is over, now they're launching it, Gaza will visit your town soon.
a desperate activist tells Malcolm X that the situation is hopeless as there are too many powerful interests and too few to oppose them. Malcolm's response is as important today as it was then: "Never let your enemy tell you how many of you there are."
You seem to have a lot of free time on your hands dumbass, American apartheid mirrors the Israeli one, only it's more polite and hidden due to size and the fact that America has already killed most of the indigenous. Your employers won't like it so you kiss its ass
This dumbfck thinks that the world of make believe, endless wars, pandemics, dreams and aliens makes Americans "realists"- why do MI6 recruit retarded fucks?