@MStoudenmire@MathMatize Contrast with real analysis where continuity is a weaker condition and you can easily have "nice" functions with quite different singularities e.g. 1/x versus 1/x^2
@MStoudenmire@MathMatize Mult. achieves rotation ⇒ strong constraints on continuity & that all values are achieved in balls around essential singularities ≈ there's only one way for good functions to fail being good & that failure is captured by the modulus ⇒ Riemann sphere is the correct extension.
@pulpy_fiction There's a tendency to tie up one's whole personality in the PhD. Coupled with the low pay, you get a psychologically distressing cocktail, "if I fail, my glorious poverty was as pointless as my life will have turned out".
@RodeoProfessor I don't know...just seems like a defense pic. We can't all always wear our bow ties, suspenders, and government issue spats. PhD people are people, *shrugs*
@MStoudenmire@QuantaMagazine As long as you've a bias against choosing a basis and a good idea when you might accidentally find yourself in infinite dimensional settings and and and
I don't actually have a problem w/ that view.
@Aron_Adler It does skip all the hard stuff to do with using periodic functions as a basis... but I see your point, love a good illustration to highlight parts of an idea
@aryehazan Of if you like computation, you might like proofs in sheaf theory that do stuff by components/ in generators. Extra credit: computations that rely on existence of a set of generators for something who's Kan extension solves your problem