have you considered just fucking *deciding* with your homies to "get" "good" collectively and smash through the problem to create a new golden age for humanity
@GarrettPetersen The truth is that the far right and far left are both full of people with illiberal tendencies and that people pattern match on it to call out either side is proof that it was written well
@rob_mcrobberson at some point you just gotta call balls and strikes
its not Taylor’s or our fault that to become a popular reporter you’re incentivized to act completely batshit for a while
@atrembath Surprised sclerotic old institutions and individuals haven’t moved on from the failed strategy of creating scarcity and offsetting it by subsidizing demand? No.
Disappointed that they’re still opposed to supply side reform, absolutely
@willpoffwebster@AidanRMackenzie Thats what gets lost in this debate. Nobody is against planning and considering harms.
The argument is spending 85% of total project time pushing paperwork around is untenable
Bringing it down to a highly conservative 50% still cuts almost 15 years off this project
@AndrewCurran_ who would have guessed “we’ll help you blatantly spam companies and game their systems for personal benefit at the ultimate expense of the entire customer base” wouldn’t go down well
@madbeatboy@gtmulligan@ATabarrok@citizensclimate banning whaling is globally good but locally harms fishermen
just as reducing fossil fuels is globally good but requires renewable energy development locally
Come up with a better argument
@VioletFlame23 Who cares regardless, people are allowed to change their mind and don’t have to agree with either party on any given issue
He’s not a politician