A Muslim woman in hijab was caught stealing at a Walmart in Illinois. Her excuse?
“I’m Palestinian. This is my right”
She also got very angry and didn’t want to be touched by male officers because it’s ’haram.’ So a male officer touching her is haram, but stealing is halal. Got it.
Thanks to the global left, the so-called ‘Palestinian’ Arabs are the most entitled people in the world. They really believe they are special and above the law, no matter where they are in the world.
@D_onald_trump47 Salwan Momika (also spelled Salwan Momika), an Iraqi refugee who staged multiple public Quran burnings in Sweden in 2023, was shot and killed on January 29, 2025, in Södertälje near Stockholm—hours before a court verdict in his case was due.
supergrok says this is bullshit - Partially true on the legislative change, but false on the claim that it legalizes terminating or killing healthy newborns (or defines that as legal infanticide).
In 2023, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz signed an omnibus health bill (SF 2995) that substantially amended Minnesota Statutes § 145.423 (the Born Alive Infants Protection Act, originally from 1976 and strengthened in 2015). It was not a full “repeal” in the sense of deleting the section entirely, but it repealed most of the previous subdivisions and rewrote the core provision.https://t.co/mKxo9HNCai
What the law said before and after
Prior language (2015 version, focused on abortion survivors): A born-alive infant “as a result of an abortion” must be recognized as a human person with immediate legal protection. Responsible medical personnel “shall” take “all reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice… to preserve the life and health of the born alive infant.” Related provisions required reporting of such cases to the state and included other specifics (e.g., physician availability after 20 weeks).Snopes
Current language: “An infant who is born alive shall be fully recognized as a human person, and accorded immediate protection under the law. All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to care for the infant who is born alive.” The abortion-specific wording was removed (it now covers all born-alive infants), the “preserve the life and health” requirement was changed to “care for,” and reporting requirements, civil penalties, and most other subdivisions were repealed.https://t.co/mKxo9HNCai
Bill author Rep. Tina Liebling (DFL) described the shift toward “comfort care” (as opposed to aggressive/lifesaving measures) in cases where it is medically appropriate, such as non-viable infants or those with lethal anomalies, allowing parental and physician discretion rather than a state mandate to attempt preservation of life in every instance.Mccl
On the “legal termination / infanticide / comfort care as killing healthy infants” claim
This is false or highly misleading:
Infanticide (killing a born child) remains illegal under Minnesota homicide laws and federal law. The statute still explicitly recognizes a born-alive infant as a human person with immediate legal protection. Fact-checkers including Snopes and PolitiFact rate claims that Walz legalized letting babies die or authorized post-birth killing as false; legal experts note that once born, infants have full protections against murder, assault, etc., under existing criminal and civil law. A healthy newborn cannot be “legally terminated.”Snopes
“Comfort care” is standard palliative practice for dying or non-viable infants (pain relief, comfort measures) and was already reported in some pre-2023 Minnesota cases. It is not a new license to drug healthy infants until death.
Actual cases of infants born alive after abortion attempts were rare in Minnesota (Minnesota Department of Health data: roughly 24 total over the years of required reporting under the 2015 law, e.g., 5 in 2021, 3 in 2019, 0 in 2022). Most involved pre-viable infants or those with severe/fatal anomalies; reported cases did not survive. The 2023 changes also ended the specific public reporting of these cases.Snopes
Pro-life groups (e.g., Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life) argue the wording change removes a guarantee of lifesaving measures and could leave some viable or treatable infants without required efforts to preserve life, particularly if legislative intent (as described by the bill’s author) is interpreted as prioritizing comfort care. Supporters and fact-checkers counter that it aligns care with good medical practice and parental decision-making in rare, tragic situations without legalizing killing, and that the old language was not needed given general laws against homicide and medical ethics.Lifenews
In short, Walz signed a real change that removed the specific “preserve the life and health” mandate for (primarily abortion-related) born-alive infants and related reporting. It did not legalize post-birth termination of healthy infants or redefine infanticide as permissible.
HOLY SH*T.. Liberals are jumping onto the border wall construction and attempting to chain themselves to rebar in front of machinery.
Border Patrol also had to pull one protester out of a tree with a CRANE, and another woman stayed chained to a gravel truck for almost 7 hours before agents sawed her loose. Around two dozen protesters have been arrested so far,
A country isn’t a country without a border. These people are mental.