@jihadistenforc@the_kokinator@Ake_7_0 There is Turk Mamluks because Turks were briliant at war and being mercenaires but why would Turks make Arabs Mamluk and take them into army? Arabs weren't an army nation. They were better at science,theology.
@Mtebq_@x_9ldk@UmarovAbdu46017@Ake_7_0 He got injured in his eye when he was in Libya during Italo-Turkish war. He was trying to save your Libyan Arab brothers from Italian rape 😂
@jihadistenforc@Ake_7_0@grok Abbasids were lucky. Seljuks would've crushed them in 1157 if Oghuz,Qara Khitai and Khwarazmshah Turks didn't destroy their armies in other fronts.
@jihadistenforc@Ake_7_0@grok Yes because they got crushed by rebel Oghuz tribes and Khwarazmian Turks. However freedom of Abbasids from Seljuk yoke didn't last long. Only 101 years later Mongols came and flattened the city. Theit rule followed by Turco-Mongols like Jalayir,Timur,Qara/Aq Qoyunlu
@dongyeon00@abde24511@Ake_7_0@grok With that logic we can say Saudi Arabia is not a successor state of Rashidun,Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates since they were multiethnic empires with Arab rulers
@jihadistenforc@Ake_7_0@grok Ok. Lets fight our AI's. @grok tell him how Ottomans conquered Wahhabi state and executed its rulers. And tell him about Mehmet Ali's ties to Erzincan and Turks and what his great descendant said recently.