🇿🇦A Tax Revolt Is Coming ⁉️
A TAX REVOLT is definitely coming.... It's the only ammunition we have left.
#TaxSlaves ....That is all we are!
#TaxSlaves#TaxRevolt#TAXREVOLT
The debt system is the cleanest version of the whole operation because it requires no soldiers.
A country gets a loan from the IMF or World Bank, usually in a moment of crisis, often a crisis produced or deepened by prior colonial extraction.
The loan comes with conditions.
Structural adjustment programs.
Privatize your public utilities.
Cut your social spending.
Open your markets to foreign competition.
Devalue your currency.
Remove subsidies on food and fuel.
The local economy, already fragile, is further destabilized by the conditions of its own rescue.
The country cannot repay.
The country gets more loans with more conditions.
The debt grows.
The conditions deepen.
The government, unable to deliver services to its population, faces protests.
The protests are called "instability."
The instability is cited as evidence that the country cannot "manage itself."
"External oversight" is recommended.
More conditions are attached.
The country was never in debt to the bank.
The bank was in debt to the country, for centuries of extracted resources and suppressed development, and found a mechanism to make the creditor pay the debtor.
And called it "aid."
And called it "development."
And called it, with a straight face, "civilization."
1.She hired a nanny and put her on government payroll.
2.forced the Nanny to share half her salary with her daughter.
2.China donates cars to Womens league, she gives them to her daughter.
That's it:
ARREST HER NOW!
We need to stop calling politicians public servants.
Servants don't fly private.
Servants don't own five homes.
Servants don't retire richer than they started.
They are mostly serving themselves, and it’s time we saw through their BS.
People occupy private property. They stop paying rent. Buildings get hijacked in our cities. And removal takes months… sometimes years.
The law is trying to protect dignity but in practice, it’s enabling chaos.
The @The_DHS has released a new PIE Amendment Bill that will shape how South Africa deals with eviction and land occupation.
Be part of the SACR submission. Complete our form or submit directly.
Form: https://t.co/e256FUvmsT
You have lost a quarter of your purchasing power in 4 years and no one is rioting.
You literally were made 25% poorer so the government could spend more money to hand out to their friends.
Them: "Taxation isn't theft because we have the “consent of the governed” through the vote.
Me: "That is an interesting definition of consent. Tell me. if a group of five people encounters a lone traveler, and four of them vote to take his bag, does the vote make the taking an act of “sharing” rather than “robbery”?
Them: "No, that’s just a mob. We have laws and a social contract."
Me: "Ah, so the number of people involved doesn't change the nature of the act? If the mob grows to a million, is the traveler’s bag still his property?”
Them: "Well, yes. But we vote on things we all need! It’s for the common good."
Me: "I see. Let us test the “common good” logic against the most private property of all: the body. If a crowd of men decides, by majority vote, that a woman’s body should be used for their pleasure or “the common good” of the tribe, does the vote grant her consent?"
Them: "That’s a horrific comparison! No! That is a violent crime because her body belongs to her, not the crowd."
Me: "So we agree: A person’s body is theirs by right, and no amount of voting can transfer that ownership to the majority?"
Them: "Obviously."
Me: "Then tell me - what is labor? Is it not the use of one's body and time over a day, a month, or a year?"
Them: "I suppose it is."
Me: "If I own my body, I must own my labor. And if I own my labor, I must own the fruit of that labor - the wages I earned. If the crowd cannot vote to take my body, by what logic can they vote to take the product of my body’s work?"
Them: "But how would we fund things? How would we protect the poor? Without income taxes, everything would collapse!"
Me: "So, the theft of labor, ie one’s body, is necessary because you cannot imagine a better way to pay for things?"
Them: "It’s not theft! It’s the price we pay for society!"
Me: "If a man steals your car but uses the money to buy bread for the hungry, has the theft vanished? Or do we simply have a thief with a good excuse?"
Them: "You’re being impossible. It’s just how the world works!"
Me: No, it is you being impossible. Impossible in that you wish to fit two opposing ideas into the same. The “consent” you speak of is merely a mask. You do not believe in the vote; you believe in the utility of the haul. You are a man who claims he hates violence, yet asks his friends to vote on which neighbor to rob for dinner. Oh, and it doesn’t have to work this way. But it will as long as people think the way you think…