@UBERSOY1 It had been known since 1929 that this would be the case.
Any law, policy, or institution based on the assumption of an ever-growing birthrate is simply not fit for purpose.
@lauriewired Those possessed by this novel idea will find out that the consumer would rather (and can) go backwards rather than go this-version-of "forwards".
What you might succeed in doing tho is bankrupting every AAA gaming studio.
that part sounds good to me 👍
@miketermaat_ No socialist actually cares about whether anything runs properly.
They care about being more morally consistent in their altruism than you.
@dexarok@nmlinguaphile Yes. And perhaps even a disproportionate number of immigrants who (at least in generation 1) think differently about having kids
@standupmonkey whether or not they are better, the comparison isn't against last year,
it's against other teams in their division
after those teams have made their own improvements.
@JoeRoganRecaps False alternatives.
People who regret behaving one way ricochet back the other way, committing the same mistake in the other direction.
@AndrewWilimek@Senators "Brady left so LW1 is wide open"
*gets LW2 Eklund treating as LW1*
"didn't get any secondary scoring in the playoffs so we need a RW2 behind Batherson!"
*gets LW3-and-falling Burakovsky for 5mill*
"Backup goaltending was poor last year!"
*trades for the worst one*
Fans: 🤔
@hrh_elliot Don't say "for Nothing"
The goal, as usual, was expanding power over you
And in that way, it was very successful
Saying "for nothing" implies
the intent is considered justifiable
and so the goalposts will always be able to be moved to a next time
@schtev69 Some people don't find out how firmly or tenuously they hold their own convictions until they meet someone else who wants to negotiate others into them.
Not convince.
Trade.